Chodźcie z nami! Nowe technologie i reprezentacja zbiorowa pracowników cyfrowych platform zatrudnienia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.95.06Słowa kluczowe:
cyfrowe platformy zatrudnienia, związki zawodowe, reprezentacja zbiorowa, zarządzanie algorytmiczneAbstrakt
Celem niniejszego krótkiego opracowania jest zarysowanie problemów, z jakimi boryka się zbiorowe prawo pracy w obliczu nowych form organizacji pracy, takich jak platformy cyfrowe. Gospodarka cyfrowa przyniosła automatyzację pracy, cyfryzację procesów i koordynację przez platformy. W porównaniu z innymi przedsiębiorstwami istnieją znaczące różnice w sposobie organizacji i zarządzania platformami za pomocą algorytmów. Pracownicy platform zatrudnienia przeszli długą drogę od początkowej formy organizowania się we wspólnotach samopomocowych, cechach do spółdzielni i pełnego uczestnictwa w strukturach związków zawodowych. Obecnie należy się zastanowić, jak wykorzystać technologie i dane gromadzone przez firmy platformowe z korzyścią dla pracowników.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Adams-Prassl, Jeremias. Martin Risak. 2017. “Uber, TaskRabbit & Co: Platforms as Employers? Rethinking the Labour Law of Crowdwork”. In The New Foundations of Labour Law. Edited by Kerstin Ahlberg, Niklas Bruun. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Akgüç, Mehtap. Miroslav Beblavý. Elina Cirule. Zachary Kilhoffer. 2018. Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE) Comparative Report. Brussels: Jobs & Skills Unit – CEPS. https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/IRSDACE_Comparative.pdf
Google Scholar
Aloisi, Antonio. 2016. “Commoditized Workers. Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of ‘On-Demand/Gig Economy’ Platforms”. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 653–690.
Google Scholar
Aloisi, Antonio. 2019. Negotiating the Digital Transformation of Work: Non-Standard Workers’ Voice, Collective Rights and Mobilisation Practices in the Platform Economy. Italy: European University Institute.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3404990
Berg, Janine. Marianne Furrer. Ellie Harmon. Uma Rani. M. Six Silberman. 2011. Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work. Towards Decent Work in the Online world. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar
Choudary, Sangeet Paul. 2018. The Architecture of Digital Labour Platforms: Policy Recommendations on Platform Design for Worker Well-being. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar
de Groen, Willem Pieter. Zachary Kilhoffer. Karolien Lenaerts. Irene Mandl. 2018. Employment and Working Conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2018/employment-and-working-conditions-of-selected-types-ofplatform-work
Google Scholar
Degryse, Christophe. 2016. Digitalisation of the Economy and Its Impact on Labour Markets. Working Paper 2016.2. Brussels: ETUI.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2730550
Eichhorst, Werner. Wolfgang Schroeder. 2018. The German Employment Model, the Trade Unions and “Working 4.0”. Bratislava: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung I Regional Project on Labour Relations and Social Dialogue.
Google Scholar
Eurofound. 2015. New Forms of Employment. 3 March 2021. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/topic/new-forms-of-employment.
Google Scholar
Eurofound. 2019. On-location Client-determined Moderately Skilled Platform Work: Employment and Working Conditions. Publications Office of the European Union: Dublin. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pl/data/platform-economy/records/on-location-client-determinedmoderately-skilled-platform-work-employment-and-working-conditions
Google Scholar
Felstiner, Alek. 2010. “Working the Crowd: Employment and Labor Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry”. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 32(1): 143–203. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1593853 [Accessed: 10 May 2017].
Google Scholar
Irani, Lilly C. M Six Silberman. 2013. “Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘13). 611–620. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. http://crowdsourcing-class.org/readings/downloads/ethics/turkopticon.pdf [Accessed: 14 February 2020].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742
Jesnes, Kristin. Anna Ilsøe. 2020. “Collective agreements for platform workers? Examples from the Nordic countries”. In Platform Work in the Nordic models. Issues, cases and Responses. Edited by Kristin Jesnes, Sigurd M. Nordli Oppegaard. 53–67. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1431693&dswid=2916
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6027/5a6e47ab-en
Johnston, Hannah. Christopher Land-Kazlauskas. 2019. Organizing on-demand: Representation, Voice and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar
Kenner, Jeff. 2019. “Uber Drivers are ‘Workers’: The Expanding Scope of the ‘Worker’ Concept in the UK’s Gig Economy”. In Precarious Work. The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe. Edited by Jeff Kenner, Izabela Florczak, Mark Otto. 197–220. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973267.00020
Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2016. “Algorithms that Divide and Unite: Delocalisation, Identity and Collective Action in ‘Microwork’”. In Space, Place and Global Digital Work. Edited by Jörg Flecker. 53–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4
Mandl, Irene. 2019. Platform Work: Maximising the Potential while Safeguarding Standards? Dublin: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/policy-brief/2019/platform-work-maximising-the-potential-while-safeguarding-standards
Google Scholar
Möhlmann, Mareike. Lior Zalmanson. 2017. “Hands on the Wheel: Navigating Algorithmic Management and Uber Drivers’ Autonomy”. Paper presented at Thirty Eight International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). December 10–13. Seoul, South Korea.
Google Scholar
OECD. 2018. Negotiating Our Way up. Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1fd2da34-en
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/1fd2da34-en
Pesole, Annarosa. Maria Cesira Urzí Brancati. Enrique Fernández-Macías. Federico Biagi. Ignacio González Vázquez. 2018. Platform Workers in Europe. Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Google Scholar
Piątkowski, Jan. 2008. Uprawnienia zakładowej organizacji związkowej. Toruń: TNOIK.
Google Scholar
Saxton, Gregory D. Onook Oh. Rajiv Kishore. 2013. “Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control”. Information Systems Management (30)1: 2–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2013.739883 [Accessed: 12 March 2017].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2013.739883
Schildt, Henri. 2017. “Big Data and Organizational Design – The Brave New World of Algorithmic Management and Computer Augmented Transparency”. Innovation (19)1: 23–30.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1252043
Unterschütz, Joanna. 2019. “Digital Work – Real Bargaining: How Can the Sustainability of Social Dialogue Be Ensured in the Digital Era?” In Precarious Work. The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe. Edited by Jeff Kenner, Izabela Florczak, Marta Otto. 222–242. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973267.00021
Unterschütz, Joanna. 2019. “The Concept of the ‘Employment Relation’” In The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Employment Relation. Edited by Filip Dorssemont, Klaus Lörcher, Stefan Clauwaert, Mélanie Schmitt. 81–100. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509922680.ch-005
Unterschütz, Joanna. 2020. Digital Labour Platforms: Dusk or Dawn of Labour Law? [Manuscript].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28511-1_20
Vandaele, Kurt. 2018. Will Trade Unions Survive in the Platform Economy? Emerging Patterns for Platform Workers’ Collective Voice and Representation in Europe. Working Paper 2018.05. Brussels: ETUI.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3198546
Wood, Alex J., Mark Graham. Vili Lehdonvirta. Isis Hjorth. 2019. “Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy”. Work, Employment and Society 33(1): 56–75.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Wordpress. 2016. “UberEats & Deliveroo Update”. 7 September 2016. https://iwgbclb.wordpress.com/2016/09/07/ubereats-deliveroo-update/
Google Scholar
Wordpress. 2017. “Brighton Deliveroo Strike leads to unionisation”. 7 February 2017. https://iwgbclb.wordpress.com/2017/02/07/brighton-deliveroo-strike-leads-to-unionisation/
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.