The Theory of Epistemic (In)Justice in the Perspective of the Performance of Law: An Approach Based On The Concept Of Hermeneutic Therapy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.109.10Keywords:
epistemic (in)justice, hermeneutic therapy, language games, performance of law, legal imagination, deliberationAbstract
In this paper, the assumptions of Miranda Fricker’s theory of epistemic (in)justice read in the context of the neo-Wittgensteinian philosophical trend, also called therapeutic or resolute approach, will be approximated. The theory in question concerns the issue of unequal participation of the experiences of specific marginalised individuals or their groups in the practices of legal meaning-making. The aim of the paper is to show the role of the said theory in legal theory. In the first step, I will discuss the main assumptions of the theory of epistemic (in)justice and its varieties from the perspective of the lawyer-layperson epistemic dependence. I will also present normative proposals for implementing the ideal of epistemic justice as well as a justification for abandoning such a research approach. In the second step, I will show an alternative to normative approaches in the form of a theoretical innovation consisting in supplementing the assumptions of the epistemic (in)justice theory with a therapeutic-resolute reading of the late Wittgenstein in the hermeneutic perspective. In the third step, I will demonstrate that the full application of the theoretical innovation presented in the previous steps within legal institutions requires taking into account the critical category of legal imagination related to “playing” or the performance of law (the game activity) in the sense of performance studies. The fourth step will be to identify sensitive legal institutions that can be improved by including the categories proposed by the theory in question while taking into account the concept of hermeneutic therapy derived from Type III deliberation. In order to illustrate the application possibilities of the theory of epistemic (in)justice in the area of law, I will use a case study. I will apply the following methods: analytical, thick description, and critical legal studies with elements of feminist research methodology.
Downloads
References
Annunziata, Filippo. Giorgio Fabio Colombo. Eds. 2018. Law and Opera. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68649-3
Berenstain, Nora. 2016. “Epistemic Exploitation.” Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3(22): 569–590. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022
Boncompagni, Anna. 2020. “Prejudice in Testimonial Justification: A Hinge Account.” Episteme 1: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.40
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.40
Boswell, John. 2022. “Narrative Analysis.” In Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Selen A. Ercan, Hans Asenbaum, Nicole Curato, Ricardo F. Mendonça. 333–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848925.003.0023
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848925.003.0023
Brożek, Bartosz. 2018. Umysł prawniczy. [The Legal Mind]. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Google Scholar
Bublitz, Jan Christoph. 2023. “When is Disbelief Epistemic Injustice? Criminal Procedure, Recovered Memories, and Deformations of Epistemic Subjects.” Criminal Law and Philospohy 2: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572–023–09695–3
Google Scholar
Burlando-Salazar, Julian A. 2023. “Preventing the Epistemic Harm of Testimonial Injustice in Lay Witness Credibility Assessments.” Boston University Law Review 103(4): 1245–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572–023–09695–3
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09695-3
Carter, Terrell. Rachel López. 2024. “If Lived Experience Could Speak: A Method for Repairing Epistemic Violence in Law & The Legal Academy”. Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2024-26, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4741795 [access: 14.10.2024].
Google Scholar
Constanza-Chock, Sasha. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA–London: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
Corso, Lucia. 2023. “Epistemic Injustice, Judiciary Reasoning and Stereotypes: From Narrow, to Broad, to Broader.” Milan Law Review 4(2): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.54103/milanlawreview/22186
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/milanlawreview/22186
Crary, Alice. 2000. “Introduction.” In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Alice Crary, Rupert Read. 1–18. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Crary, Alice. 2002. “What Do Feminists Want in an Epistemology?” In Feminist Interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Edited by Naomi Scheman, Peg O’Connor. 97–118. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp7jh.10
Crary, Alice. 2018. “The Metodological is Political. What’s the Matter with ‘Analytic Feminism?’” Radical Philosophy 2(2): 47–60.
Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. “A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 33(1): 24–47. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2012.a472779
Dyrda, Adam. 2021. “Epistemologiczne problemy prawoznawstwa.” [Epistemological Problems of Jurisprudence]. In Teoria i filozofia prawa. [Theory and Philosophy of Law]. Edited by Adam Dyrda. 29–32. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Ferreira, Nuno. 2022. “Utterly Unbelievable: The Discourse of ‘Fake’ SOGI Asylum Claims as a Form of Epistemic Injustice.” International Journal of Refugee Law 34: 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeac041
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeac041
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and The Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Fricker, Miranda. 2013. „Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?” Synthese 190(7): 1317–1332.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0227-3
Gaakeer, Jeanne. 2024. “Feel, Show, Tell: Affect and Legality in the Trial as Performance.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 20(2): 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/174387212311776
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721231177641
García-Valdecasas, Miguel. 2023. “Are Wittgenstein’s Hinges Rational World-Pictures? The Groundlessness Theory Reconsidered.” Topoi 42: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245–022–09830–0
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09830-0
Glaberson, Stephanie. 2024. “The Epistemic Injustice of Algorithmic Family Policing.” UC Irvine Law Review 14(2): 404–456.
Google Scholar
Gonzales, Rose. Jasmine B. 2024. “A Critical Perspective on Testimonial Injustice: Interrogating Witnesses’ Credibility Excess in Criminal Trials. A Comment on Federico Picinali’s 'Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial’.” Quaestio Facti. Revista Internacional Sobre Razonamiento Probatorio 7: 173–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043
Gordon, Randy. 2023. The Performance of Law: Everyday Lawyering at the Intersection of Advocacy and Imagination. Abingdon–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003304579
Grygieńć, Janusz. 2021a. “Czy powinniśmy bać się zależności epistemicznej (i jak bardzo)?” [Should We Fear Epistemic Dependence (And How Much)?] Filozofia i Nauka. Studia filozoficzne i interdyscyplinarne 9(1): 11–28.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37240/FiN.2021.9.1.3
Grygieńć, Janusz. 2021b. “Od dyktatury ekspertów do demokracji nieliberalnej. Podejście systemowe do demokracji deliberacyjnej i jego braki.” [From the Dictatorship of Experts to Illiberal Democracy: A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy and Its Shortcomings]. Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki 28(4): 15–40.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2021.28.04
Gutiérrez, Natalia Urzola. 2024. “Gender in Climate Litigation in Latin America: Epistemic Justice Through a Feminist Lens.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 16(1): 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad030
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad030
Hanan, M. Eve. 2020. “Invisible Prisons.” UC Davis Law Review 54(2): 1185–1244.
Google Scholar
Harding, Brynne. 2020. “R v Theriault: A Case of Epistemic Injustice.” ABlawg.ca 10: 1–12. https://ablawg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Blog_BH_Theriault.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2008. “Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power.” Policy and Society 28(3): 173–184.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004
Hoven, Emilie van den. 2021. “Hermeneutical Injustice and the Computational Turn in Law.” Journal of Cross-disciplinary Research in Computational Law 1(1): 1–13.
Google Scholar
Jain, Dipika. Kimberly M. Rhoten. 2020. “Epistemic Injustice and Judicial Discourse on Transgender Rights in India: Uncovering Temporal Pluralism.” Journal of Human Values 26(1): 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685819890186
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685819890186
Kjaer, Poul F. 2022. “What is Transformative Law?” European Law Open 1: 760–780. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.1
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.1
Klimowicz, Katarzyna. 2016. “Utopia w «realistycznej» teorii demokracji przedstawicielskiej i realizm w «utopijnych» teoriach demokracji deliberatywnej i partycypacyjnej.” [Utopia in ‘Realistic’ Theory of Representative Democracy and Realism in ‘Utopian’ Theories of Deliberative and Participatory Democracy]. Hybris. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny 33(2): 33–52.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.33.03
Koczanowicz, Leszek. 2020. Lęk i olśnienie. Eseje o kulturze niepokoju. [Anxiety and Lucidity: Reflections on Culture in Times of Unrest]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN.
Google Scholar
Leiboff, Marett. 2015. “Towards a Jurisprudence of the Embodied Mind – Sarah Lund, Forbrydelsen and the Mindful Body.” Naveiñ Reet: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research. Special Issue on Law and Art 6: 77–92.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i6.111054
Levinson, Stanford. Jack M. Balkin. 1991. “Law, Music, and Other Performing Arts.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139(6): 1597–1568.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312391
Levy, Ron. 2018. “The ‘Elite Problem’ in Deliberative Constitutionalism.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Edited by Ron Levy, Hoi Kong, Graeme Orr, Jeff King. 351–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289474.027
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289474.027
Lobo, Camila. 2022. “Speaking Silences: A Wittgensteinian Inquiry into Hermeneutical Injustice.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 12: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v11.3643
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v11.3643
Łętowska, Ewa. 2005. “Communicare et humanum est – o komunikacyjnej misji prawników i muzyków.” [Communicare et humanum est – on the Communicative Mission of Lawyers and Musicians]. Monitor Prawniczy 1: 3–7.
Google Scholar
Medina, José. 2011. “The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 25(2): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.534568
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.534568
Medina, José. 2012. “Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge. Culture and Policy 26(2): 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652214
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652214
Mulcahy, Sean. 2022. “Methodologies of Law and Performance.” Law and Humanities 16(2): 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2022.2123616
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2022.2123616
Muradova, Lala. 2021. “Seeing the Other Side? Perspective-Taking and Reflective Political Judgements in Interpersonal Deliberation.” Political Studies 69(3): 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916605
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916605
Páez, Andrés. Janaina Matida. 2023. “Editorial of Dossier ‘Epistemic Injustice in Criminal Procedure’.” Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal 9(1): 11–38. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.821
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.821
Peters, Julie Stone. 2022. Law as Performance: Theatricality, Spectatorship, and the Making of Law in Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Picinali, Federico. 2024. “Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial.” Quaestio facti. Revista Internacional sobre Rezonamiento Probatio 6: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22888
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22888
Pohlhaus Jr., Gaile. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 27(4): 715–735.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x
Ralph, Anne E. 2024. “Qualified Immunity, Legal Narrative, and the Denial of Knowledge.” Boston College Law Review 65(4): 1317–1380.
Google Scholar
Rodak, Lidia. 2011. “Objective Interpretation as Conforming Interpretation.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1(9): 1–11.
Google Scholar
Rogacka-Rzewnicka, Maria. 2023. “The Impact of the Concept of Continental (Romano-Germanic) Criminal Procedure on the Phenomenon of ‘Epistemic Injustice’.” Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal 9(3): 1109–1135. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.800
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.800
Rogers, Nicole. 2008. “The Play of Law: Comparing Performances in Law and Theatre.” Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal 8(2): 429–443.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v8i2.52
Romańczuk-Grącka, Marta. 2021. “Gaslighting jako forma przemocy psychicznej.” [Gaslighting as a Form of Psychological Violence]. Studia Prawnoustrojowe 52: 411–426. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.6614
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.6614
Rosario-Lebrón, Aníbal. 2023. “Law’s Power in Naming & Silencing (reviewing Lisa Washington, Survived & Coerced: Epistemic Injustice in the Family Regulation System, 24 Colum. L. Rev. 1097 (2022)).” Family Law Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) 11. https://family.jotwell.com/laws-power-in-naming-silencing/ (accessed: 6.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Safjan, Marek. Przemysław Mikłaszewicz. 2011. “Granice uprzywilejowania wyrównawczego.” [The Limits of Compensatory Preference]. Przegląd Sejmowy 107(6): 31–45.
Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. Lawrence Douglas. Martha Merrill Umphrey. 2018. Law and Performance. Amherst–Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv346v7v
Schmidt, Eva. 2024. “Epistemic Injustice in Deliberative Mini Publics”. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 20(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.1493
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.1493
Skuczyński, Paweł. 2016. “The Attitudes of Lawyers Towards the Constitutional Crisis and the Independence of the Judiciary.” In The Limits of Judicial Independence? Edited by Grzegorz Borkowski. 149–166. Warszawa–Toruń: Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa.
Google Scholar
Skuczyński, Paweł. 2020. “Narrativity of Legal Language in the Law-Making Process.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 22(1): 1–17. https://doi.org//10.36280/AFPIFS.2020.1.66ENG
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.1.66ENG
Sorial, Sarah. 2022. “Deliberation and the Problems of Exclusion and Uptake: The Virtues of Actively Facilitating Equitable Deliberation and Testimonial Sensibility.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25: 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677–022–10273–0
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10273-0
Sousa, Ronald de. 2009. “Epistemic Feelings.” Mind and Matter 7(2): 139–161.
Google Scholar
Spiegel, Thomas J. 2022. “The Epistemic Injustice of Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11(9): 75–90.
Google Scholar
Stawecki, Tomasz. Jan Winczorek. 2015. “Posłowie.” [Afterword]. In Wykładnia konstytucji. Inspiracje, teorie, argumenty. [Constitutional Interpretation: Inspirations, Theories, Arguments]. Edited by Tomasz Stawecki, Jan Winczorek. 517–528. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Sullivan, Michael. 2017. “Epistemic Injustice and the Law.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Edited by Ian James Kidd, José Medina, Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. 293–302. Abingdon–New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043.ch28
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043-29
Sveinsdóttir, Ásta. 2016. “The Naturalism Question in Feminism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Edited by Kelly James Clark. 49–60. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118657775.ch4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118657775.ch4
Tobiasz, Marcin. 2016. “Demokracja deliberatywna a władza. Iluzje współdecydowania.” [Deliberative Democracy and Power. Illusions of Co-Decision]. Studia Politologiczne 41: 106–122.
Google Scholar
Tobiasz, Marcin. 2021. “Deliberacja jako forma wykluczenia.” [Deliberation as a Form of Exclusion]. Myśl Polityczna 2(8): 31–45.
Google Scholar
Ufel, Wojciech. 2023. Granice demokracji. Dylematy deliberacji w perspektywie filozofii gier językowych. [The Limits of Democracy: Dilemmas of Deliberation from the Perspective of the Philosophy of Language Games]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar
Ufel, Wojciech. 2025. “Language-Based Critique of Deliberation as a ‘Picture’ in the ‘Album Theory’ of Democracy.” In Wittgenstein and Democratic Politics. Language, Dialogue and Political Forms of Life. Edited by Lotar Rasiński, Anat Bieletzki, Leszek Koczanowicz, Thomas Wallgreen. 274–294. New York–Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003485254-17
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003485254-17
Walker, Melanie. 2020. “Why Lawyers and Legal Educators Should Care About (Epistemic) Justice.” International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 27(1): 5–46. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v27i1.915
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v27i1.915
Washington, S. Lisa. 2022. “Survived & Coerced: Epistemic Injustice in the Family Regulation System.” Columbia Law Review 122(4): 1097–1664.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2000a. Dociekania filozoficzne. [Philosophical Investigations]. Translated by Bogusław Wolniewicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2000b. Tractatus logicus-philosophicus. Translated by Bogusław Wolniewicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2014. O pewności. [On Certainty]. Translated by Bohdan Chwedeńczuk. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
Google Scholar
Ziemińska, Renata. 2013. Historia sceptycyzmu. W poszukiwaniu spójności. [The History of Skepticism: In Search of Consistency]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/978-83-231-6009-0
Ziółkowski, Michał. 2015. “Zasada równości w prawie.” [Principle of Equality in the Law]. Państwo i Prawo 5: 94–111.
Google Scholar
Zirk-Sadowski, Marek. 2021. Wprowadzenie do filozofii prawa. [Introduction to the Legal Philosophy]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950, Journal of Laws 1993, No. 61, item 284, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_eng.
Google Scholar
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of April 2, 1997, Journal of Laws, 1997, No. 78, item 483 as amended.
Google Scholar
Act of November 17, 1964 – Code of Civil Procedure, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 1568.
Google Scholar
Act of June 26, 1974 – Labour Code, Journal of Laws, 2023, item 1465.
Google Scholar
Act of June 6, 1997 – Code of Criminal Procedure, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 37.
Google Scholar
Act of June 6, 1997 – Criminal Code, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 17.
Google Scholar
Act of August 27, 1997 on Vocational and Social Rehabilitation and Employment of Persons with Disabilities, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 44.
Google Scholar
Act of March 12, 2004 on Social Assistance, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 1283.
Google Scholar
Act of January 6, 2005 on National and Ethnic Minorities and on the Regional Language, Journal of Laws, 2017, item 823.
Google Scholar
Act of July 29, 2005 on Counteracting Domestic Violence, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 424.
Google Scholar
Act of December 2, 2010 on the Implementation of Certain EU Regulations on Equal Treatment, Journal of Laws, 2024, item 1175.
Google Scholar
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of January 20, 2022, D.M. and N. v. Italy, 60083/19, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/#{%22itemid%22:[%22001–215179%22]}
Google Scholar
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of December 12, 2023, Przybyszewska and Others v. Poland, 11454/17, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001–229391
Google Scholar
Judgment of the European Court of Justice of January 12, 2023, J.K. v. TP S.A., C-356/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:9.
Google Scholar
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of March 18, 2014, SK 53/12, OTK-A 2014/3, item 32.
Google Scholar
Resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court of December 2, 2019, I OPS 1/19, https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/0CB4DBF3D4
Google Scholar
Resolution of the Supreme Court of August 24, 2023, III PZP 1/23, http://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/orzeczenia3/iii%20pzp%201–23.pdf
Google Scholar
Judgment of the Regional Court in Lublin of June 20, 2018, VIII Pa 86/18, https://orzeczenia.lublin.so.gov.pl/
Google Scholar
Judgment of the Regional Court in Nowy Sącz of May 14, 2019, III Ca 450/18, https://orzeczenia.nowysacz.so.gov.pl/
Google Scholar
Decision of the Supreme Court of October 20, 2021, II KK 467/21, https://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/Orzeczenia3/II%20KK%20467–21.pdf
Google Scholar
Decision of the District Court for Kraków-Krowodrza in Krakow of June 12, 2023, II Kp 589/23/K, unpublished.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
