The Potential for High‑tech Exports from Selected EU Member States to China and the Related Opportunities Arising from the Belt and Road Initiative

Zuzana Kittová; Barbora Družbacká

doi:10.18778/1508-2008.27.22

Authors

Zuzana Kittová University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce Department of International Trade, Bratislava, Slovak Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-4033
Barbora Družbacká University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce, Department of International Trade Bratislava, Slovak Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.27.22

Keywords:

European Union, China, export potential, high‑tech products

Abstract

The EU’s economic relations with China are characterised by a significant trade deficit. Enhancing EU exports of high-tech products, in particular, to China is the best way out of this imbalance. In doing so, EU countries can take advantage of the opportunities provided by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that intends to improve connectivity between Europe and Asia.

Objective: This study aims to identify the untapped potential for high-tech exports of selected EU countries in trade with China and to evaluate the opportunities arising from the BRI in utilising this potential.

Research Design & Methods: To assess the overall high-tech export potential of selected EU countries to China, the export gap was calculated using the concept of revealed comparative advantages.

Findings: Among the examined EU countries, Hungary and the Czech Republic were found to have the greatest high-tech export growth potential to China. The largest export gaps were recorded in electrical machinery and equipment.

Implications & Recommendations: The findings of the study can be used by European businesses to adjust their export strategies. It can also be used by government institutions of the studied countries when designing their economic and trade policies, particularly vis-à-vis China and the BRI initiative, within the field of supporting infrastructure projects, as well as high-tech industries.

Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to the literature on the potential of EU export growth to China that has not been sufficiently explored yet. The novelty of the study is in identifying specific high-tech commodities with the highest potential for export to China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arsyad, M., Amiruddin, A., Suharno, S., Jahroh, S. (2020), Competitiveness of Palm Oil Products in International Trade: An Analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia, “Journal of Sustainable Agriculture”, 35 (2), pp. 157–167, https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.41091
Google Scholar

Astana Times (2019), As BRI enters Italy, whom should EU blame?, https://asiatimes.com/2019/04/as-bri-enters-italy-whom-should-eu-blame/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Balassa, B.A. (1965), Trade Liberalization and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage, “The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies”, 33 (2), pp. 92–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
Google Scholar

Balassa, B.A. (1986), Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal, “Review of Economics and Statistics”, 68 (2), pp. 315–319, https://doi.org/10.2307/1925512
Google Scholar

Braja, M., Gemzik Salwach, A. (2020), Competitiveness of high-tech exports in the EU countries, “Journal of International Studies”, 3 (1), pp. 359–372, https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/23
Google Scholar

Brakman, S., Tijl, H., Van Marrewijk, Ch., Olsen, J. (2022), On the revealed comparative advantages of Dutch cities, “Review of International Economics”, 31 (3), pp. 785–825, https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12644
Google Scholar

Bronček, J. (2019), Identifikácia exportného potenciálu Slovenskej republiky pri obchodovaní s Čínskou ľudovou Republikou – Ricardovský prístup, “Ekonomické rozhľady: vedecký časopis Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave”, 48 (2), pp. 158–178.
Google Scholar

Decreux, Y., Spies, J. (2016), Export Potential Assessments: A methodology to identify export opportunities for developing countries, https://umbraco.exportpotential.intracen.org/media/cklh2pi5/epa-methodology_230627.pdf (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2021), Production and international trade in high-tech products, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Production_and_international_trade_in_high-tech_products (accessed: 9.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Falkowski, K. (2018), Competitiveness of the Baltic States in International High-Technology Goods Trade, “Comparative Economic Research – Central and Eastern Europe”, 21 (1), pp. 25–43, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0002
Google Scholar

Fardella, E., Prodi, G. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian Perspective, “China & World Economy”, 25 (5), pp. 125–138, https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12217
Google Scholar

Fontagné, L., Freudenberg, M., Ünal Kesenci, D. (1999), Haute technologie et échelles de qualité: de fortes asymétries en Europe, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 8, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/1999/wp1999-08.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022).
Google Scholar

French, S. (2017), Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?, “Journal of International Economics”, 106, pp. 83–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.002
Google Scholar

Garcia-Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2016), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains?, “Working Paper Series”, 5, Bruegel Research Institute, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842517
Google Scholar

Gigler, C. (2021), The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI): A glance at the schedules, https://www.roedl.com/insights/china-eu-cai-comprehensive-agreement-on-investment-schedules (accessed: 20.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Hadzhiev, V. (2014), Overall Revealed Comparative Advantages, “Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance”, 2 (1), pp. 47–53.
Google Scholar

Hauk, W.R., Deb, K. (2017), RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model, “International Economics and Economic Policy”, 14 (1), pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-015-0317-z
Google Scholar

Hinloopen, J., Van Marrewijk, C. (2001), On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 137 (1), pp. 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707598
Google Scholar

Hoen, A.R., Oosterhaven, J. (2006), On the measurement of comparative advantage, “The Annals of Regional Science”, 40 (3), pp. 677–691, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4
Google Scholar

International Trade Center (2022a), Trade Map, https://www.trademap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

International Trade Center (2022b), Market Access Map, https://www.macmap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Karkanis, D. (2018), EU-China Trade: Geography and Institutions form 2001 to 2015, “Journal of Economic Integration”, 33 (1), pp. 1158–1175, https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1158
Google Scholar

Kašťáková, E., Luptáková, A., Družbacká, B. (2022), EU – China trade cooperation in the context of the BRI: Analysis and perspectives on different examples of the EU countries, “St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies”, 38 (3), pp. 3–25, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.101
Google Scholar

Lemoine, F., Ünal-Kesenci, D. (2002), China in the International Segmentation of Production Processes, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 2, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2002/wp2002-02.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Li, Y., Bolton, K., Westphal, T. (2018), The effect of the New Silk Road railways on aggregate trade volumes between China and Europe, “Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies”, 16 (2), pp. 275–292, https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2018.1453720
Google Scholar

Liu, D., Wen, H., Guo, F., Wang, C. (2019), The Impact of Northern Sea Route on Sino-European Trade Potential Based on Gravity Model, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 310, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332664895_The_Impact_of_Northern_Sea_Route_on_Sino-European_Trade_Potential_Based_on_Gravity_Model (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Ma, D., Lei, C., Ullah, F., Ullah, R., Baloch, Q.B. (2020), China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative and Outward Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Europe, “Sustainability”, 11 (24), 7055, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247055
Google Scholar

Mayer, T., Zignago, S. (2006), Notes on CEPII’s distances measures, http://www.cepii.fr/%5C/distance/noticedist_en.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Pitoňáková, R. (2020), Measuring trade specialisation of Slovakia on extra EU market, “International Journal of Trade and Global Markets”, 13 (1), pp. 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.104914
Google Scholar

Research and Markets (2021), Global Corticosteroids Market Report 2021 Featuring Major Players – Sumitomo, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Johnson and Johnson, GSK, AstraZeneca, Cipla, and LEO Pharma, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/13/2228869/28124/en/Global-Corticosteroids-Market-Report-2021-Featuring-ajor-Players-Sumitomo-Pfizer-Novartis-Merck-Sanofi-Johnson-and-Johnson-GSK-AstraZeneca-Cipla-and-LEO-Pharma.html (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Ribeiro, P., Carvalho, V., Santos, P. (2016), Export-Led Growth in the EU: Where and What to Export?, “The International Trade Journal”, 30 (4), pp. 319–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2016.1197806
Google Scholar

Ricardo, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, John Murray, London.
Google Scholar

Stellian, R., Danna-Buitrago, J. (2019), Revealed comparative advantages and regional specialization: Evidence from Colombia in the Pacific Alliance, “Journal of Applied Economics”, 22 (1), pp. 349–379, https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627722
Google Scholar

Torrecillas, C., Martínez, C. (2022), Patterns of specialisation by country and sector in olive applications, “Technology in Society”, 70, 102003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102003
Google Scholar

Vollrath, T.L. (1991), A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 127 (2), pp. 265–280, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986
Google Scholar

Wilson, J. (2021), Australia Shows the World What Decoupling From China Looks Like, https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/09/australia-china-decoupling-trade-sanctions-coronavirus-geopolitics/ (accessed: 12.01.2022).
Google Scholar

World Bank (2010), Trade Indicators, https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/Content/Utilities/e1.trade_indicators.htm (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Google Scholar

World Bank (2022), High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS (accessed: 10.01.2022).
Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization (2021), High-Tech Trade Rebounded Strongly in the Second Half of 2020, with New Asian Exporters Benefiting, https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/news/2021/news_0001.html (accessed: 18.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Xinhua (2020), Xinhua Headlines: Railway freight express puts China-EU cooperation amid pandemic on fast tracks, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-06/27/c_139170811.htm (accessed: 5.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Zábojník, S., Borovská, Z. (2021), Competitiveness of the Slovak Republic as a Determinant of its Success in Third Country Markets, The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020, 92, pp. 21–22, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219209018
Google Scholar