Using Space Syntax For Estimation Of Potential Disaster Indirect Economic Losses

Georgi Penchev

doi:10.1515/cer-2016-0041

Autor

Georgi Penchev University of National and World Economy, Faculty Ëconomics of Infrastructure, Department “National and Regional Security”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0041

Słowa kluczowe:

przestrzeń składni mrthodology, ekonomia pośrednie traci

Abstrakt

Referat ma na celu oszacowanie pośrednich strat ekonomicznych wynikających z klęsk żywiołowych. Generalnie, straty te są definiowane jako przerwa w działalności gospodarczej. Nawet ograniczone fizyczne uszkodzenie mienia i infrastruktury spowodowane przez klęski żywiołowe mogą powodować reakcję łańcuchową strat w łańcuchu dostaw w określonym regionie.
Metoda syntaksu przestrzeni jest rozwijana i wykorzystywana do uzyskania charakterystyki budynków, miast lub otaczającej przestrzeni. Chociaż metoda została opracowana przede wszystkim jako metoda planowania miejskiego, była również stosowana w dziedzinie sieci społecznych i gospodarczych.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Al-Sayed K., Turner A., Hillier B., Iida S., Penn A. (2015), Space syntax methodology textbook, Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL, London.
Google Scholar

Batty M. (2004), A new theory of space syntax, Working Paper 75, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
Google Scholar

Castillo M.M. (2013), Urban Patterns And Disaster Risk, [in:] Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, (ed.) Y. O. Kim, H. T. Park and K. W. Seo, Seoul: Sejong University.
Google Scholar

Clower T.L. (2005), Economic applications in disaster research, mitigation, and planning, ʻDisciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management: The Convergence of Concepts Issues and Trends From the Research Literatureʼ.
Google Scholar

Cutini V., Petri M., Santucci A. (2004), From axial maps to mark point parameter analysis – a GIS implemented method to automate configurational analysis [in:] Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2004: International conference, Assisi, Italy, may 14–17, part II.
Google Scholar

Dalton N. (2001), Fractional configurational analysis and a solution to the Manhattan problem [in:] Space Syntax 3rd International Symposium, Atlanta.
Google Scholar

Data.gov.uk, Historic Flood Map – Datasets.
Google Scholar

David S., Brookshire J.T., Mark A. Thayer (1985), A test of the expected utility model: Evidence from earthquake risks, ʻJournal of Political Economyʼ, vol. 93, no. 2.
Google Scholar

De Groeve T. et al. (2015), Guidance for recording and sharing disaster damage and loss data towards the development of operational indicators to translate the Sendai Framework into action., Publications Office, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar

Don N., MacDonald H.L.W., James C. Murdoch (1987), Uncertain hazards, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets, ʻLand Economicsʼ, vol. 63, no. 4.
Google Scholar

FEMA (2015), Estimating Potential Losses From Disasters [in:] FEMA Fact Sheet.
Google Scholar

FEMA (2014), HAZUS-MH, User Manual: Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Flood Model, FEMA.
Google Scholar

Gil J., Steinbach P. (2008), From flood risk to indirect flood impact: Evaluation of street network performance for effective management, response and repair [in:] WIT Press, WIT Press, vol. I.
Google Scholar

Grubesic T.H., Murray A.T. (2008), Vital nodes, interconnected infrastructures, and the geographies of network survivability, ʻAnnals of the Association of American Geographersʼ, vol. 96, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Hillier B., Hanson J. (1984), The social logic of space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Hillier W.R.G., Yang T., Turner A. (2012), Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap-and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space, ʻJournal of Space syntaxʼ, vol. 3, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Jiang B., Claramunt C. (2004), Topological Analysis of Urban Street Networks, ʻEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Designʼ, vol. 31, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Koks E.E. et al., (2015), Regional disaster impact analysis: Comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models, ʻNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussionsʼ, vol. 3, no. 11.
Google Scholar

OECD (2012), Disaster Risk Assessment and Risk Financing. A G20 / OECD Methodological Framework, OECD.
Google Scholar

Sakakibara H., Kajitani Y., Okada N. (2004), Road network robustness for avoiding functional isolation in disasters, ʻJournal of Transportation Engineeringʼ, vol. 130, no. 5.
Google Scholar

Schulz C. (2012), The identification of critical road infrastructures – the case of Baden-Württemberg, KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe.
Google Scholar

Turner A. (2005), Could a road-centre line be an axial line in disguise [in:] Proceedings of the 5rd Space Syntax Symposium, vol. 1.
Google Scholar