Commentary on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of September 10, 2024, in case C-465/20 P, European Commission v Ireland and Others

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2025.02.02

Keywords:

state aid, direct taxes, “normal” tax regime, arm’s length principle

Abstract

The commentary provides critical remarks on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of September 10th, 2024, in case C-465/20 P, European Commission v Ireland and Others, which concluded long-running proceedings on state aid granted to the Apple group by Ireland. The commented ruling occupies an important place in the Court’s jurisprudence not only from the perspective of its length (404 points) or the huge amount in dispute (more than 13 billion euros), but above all from its impact on the assessment of “normal” taxation under the applicable national law in the context of state aid. The ruling departs from the previous line of jurisprudence on the permissibility of applying standards external to a Member State’s legal system and may indicate a further widening of the front in the fight against aggressive tax planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avi-Yonah R., Benshalom I., Formulary Apportionment – Myths and Prospects, „Law & Economics Working Papers” 2010, no. 28, https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/art28 (dostęp: 21.04.2025).
Google Scholar

Avi-Yonah R., Clausing K., Durst M., Allocating Business Profits for Tax Purposes: A Proposal to Adopt a Formulary Profit Split, „Florida Tax Review” 2009, no. 5, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1317327
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1317327

Baistrocchi E., The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Proposal for Simplification, 2006, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1276504 (dostęp: 21.04.2025).
Google Scholar

European Commission scores stunning court win in €13B Apple tax row, 2024, https://www.politico.eu/article/commission-scores-surprise-win-in-apple-tax-row/ (dostęp: 22.04.2025).
Google Scholar

Hellerstein W., International Income Allocation in the Twenty-first Century: The International Income Allocation in the Twenty-first Century: The Case for Formulary Apportionment Case for Formulary Apportionment, 2005, https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/728 (dostęp: 21.04.2025).
Google Scholar

Kukulski Z., Międzynarodowe prawo podatkowe, [w:] Zagadnienia ogólne prawa, podatkowego, red. W. Nykiel, M. Wilk, Łódź 2014.
Google Scholar

Laskowska M., Ograniczenie zakresu stosowania w Polsce autoryzowanego podejścia OECD dotyczącego przypisywania zysku do zagranicznego zakładu, „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2022, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2022.03.08
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2022.03.08

OECD, Progress Report on Amount A of Pillar One: Two-Pillar Solution to the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy, Paris 2022, https://doi.org/10.1787/0afb5c80-en
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/0afb5c80-en

Peretiakowicz L., Wojtas M., Zasady alokacji zysku do zagranicznego zakładu z uwzględnieniem kontekstu cen transferowych, „Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia” 2017, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2017.3.87.2-16
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2017.3.87.2-16

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Miszczobrocki, Z. (2025). Commentary on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of September 10, 2024, in case C-465/20 P, European Commission v Ireland and Others. Tax Law Quarterly, (2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2025.02.02

Issue

Section

Articles

PlumX metrics