La différence sexuelle et l’utérus chez Luis Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro et Zacuto Lusitano

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9065.21.05

Mots-clés :

traités de gynécologie des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, différence sexuelle, Luís Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro, Zacuto Lusitano

Résumé

Dans les traités de gynécologie des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, l’utérus est considéré comme la cause des maladies des femmes, selon des perspectives héritées des textes hippocratiques et d’Aretée, mais simultanément et dans une vision plus positive très redevable à Galien, sa position, sa forme et ses fonctions sont présentées comme l’œuvre admirable d’une nature sage qui ne fait rien au hasard. Dans cet article, je vise à analyser la tension résultant de la coexistence de ces deux perspectives dans les traités de Luís Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro et Zacuto Lusitano sur les maladies des femmes et comment la tension entre les deux s’articule avec les vues de ces auteurs sur la différence sexuelle. Ces trois auteurs ont en commun un effort évident pour magnifier le sujet de leurs traités et pour présenter les soins médicaux aux femmes comme un domaine d’expertise particulièrement exigeant, dans lequel l’auteur médical est un personnage clé qui fait autorité.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Cristina Pinheiro, University of Madeira

Cristina Santos Pinheiro (PhD, University of Madeira 2009) is a Professor in the University of Madeira and a Researcher at the Centre for Classical Studies at the School of Arts and Humanities of the University of Lisbon. She led the research project “Gynecia: Rodrigo de Castro Lusitano and the ancient medical tradition about gynaecology and embryology,” funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. Her research interests include Gender Studies, Women and children in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Ancient and Early Modern medical texts on women’s diseases. She has published book chapters and articles on these topics, e.g, the edition of the Latintext and Portuguese translation of Rodrigo de Castro’s De uniuersa mulierum medicina (Part 1 and 2), the Portuguese translation of Galen’s De uteri dissectione and De foetuum formatione, “From flesh to text: The chapters on the uterus and its parts in Rodrigo de Castro’s De uniuersa mulierum medicina”. Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 23(1), p. 293-317; (forthcoming). “The enlarged clitoris: naming and defining female pathology in Rodrigo de Castro’s De uniuersa mulierum medicina”, in Pathology from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, ed. A. Foscati, M. Goyens, Brepols.

Références

Arrizabalaga, Jon, “Medical Ideals in the Sephardic Diaspora: Rodrigo’s de Castro’s Portrait of the Perfect Physician in Early Seventeenth-Century Hamburg”, Health and Medicine in Hapbsburg Spain: agents, practices, representations, ed. Teresa Huguet-Thermes, Jon Arrizabalaga, Harold J. Cook, Supplement no 29, London, The Wellcome Trust Centre of the History of Medicine at UCL, 2009, p. 107-124
Google Scholar

Blanco Pérez, José Ignácio, Humanistas Medicos en el Renacimiento Vallisoletano, Burgos, Universidad de Burgos, 1999
Google Scholar

Cadden, Joan, Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture, Cambridge University Press, 1993
Google Scholar

Carvalho, Teresa Nobre de, “Lusitano, Zacuto”, in Biografias de Cientistas, Engenheiros e Médicos Portugueses, URL: https://dicionario.ciuhct.org/cientistas/z/lusitano-zacuto/, consulted on 05.03.2025
Google Scholar

Castro, Rodrigo de, De uniuersa muliebrium morborum medicina, Hamburgi, ex bibliopolio Frobeniano, 1617
Google Scholar

Castro, Rodrigo de, De uniuersa mulierum medicina, Hamburgi, ex bibliopolio Frobeniano, 1603
Google Scholar

Du Laurens, André, Historia anatomica, Frankfurt, sumtibus Iohnae Rodii, 1602
Google Scholar

Galen, On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, trans. Margaret T. May, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1968
Google Scholar

González Manjarrés, Miguel Ángel, “Quae in ipso coitu observanda. Técnica compositiva en un capítulo de la Universa muliebrium morbōrum medicina de Rodrigo de Castro”, Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 343-370
Google Scholar

Hippocrates, t. XI, Diseases of Women 1-2, edited and translated by Paul Potter, Harvard University Press, 2018
Google Scholar

Hutson, Lorna, “The housewife and the humanists”, Feminism and Renaissance Studies, ed. Lorna Hutson, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 82-105, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782445.003.0004
Google Scholar

King, Helen, Midwifery, Obstetrics and the Rise of Gynaecology, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007
Google Scholar

King, Helen, The One-Sex Model on Trial: The Classical and Early Modern Evidence, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2013
Google Scholar

King, Helen, “Seeing the bigger picture: What is gynaecology for?,” Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 17-47
Google Scholar

Lemos, Maximiano, Zacuto Lusitano: a sua vida e a sua obra, Eduardo Tavares Martins, Editor, 1909
Google Scholar

Manuli, Paola, “Donne mascoline, femmine sterili, vergini perpetue. La ginecologia greca tra Ippocrate e Sorano”, in Madre Materia. Sociologia e biologia della donna greca, ed. Silvia Campese, Paola Manuli, Giulia Sissa, Torino, Boringhieri, 1983
Google Scholar

Mercado, Luis, De mulierum affectionibus, Vallesoleti, Didacus Fernandez a Corduba, 1579
Google Scholar

Pinheiro, Cristina, “From flesh to text: The chapters on the uterus and its parts in Rodrigo de Castro’s De uniuersa mulierum medicina”, Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 293-317
Google Scholar

Pinheiro, Cristina, “Os prefácios do tratado de ginecologia de Rodrigo de Castro Lusitano”, in Diálogos Luso-Sefarditas, ed. António M. L. Andrade, Saul A. Gomes, Maria de Fátima Reis, Aveiro, UA Editora – Universidade de Aveiro, 2022
Google Scholar

Pinheiro, Cristina, Mota, Bernardo, A medicina completa das mulheres, t. 1, Lisboa, Afrontamento, 2022, https://doi.org/10.51427/10451/57588
Google Scholar

Pinheiro, Cristina, Mota, Bernardo, A medicina completa das mulheres, t. 2, Lisboa, Afrontamento, 2022, https://doi.org/10.51427/10451/57588
Google Scholar

Pomata, Gianna, “Was there a Querelle des Femmes in early modern medicine?”, Arenal, 2013, 20.1, p. 313-341, https://doi.org/10.30827/arenal.v20i2.1569
Google Scholar

Rojo Veja, Anastacio, “Biografía del doctor Luis Mercado”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Quirúrgicas, 2015
Google Scholar

Stolberg, Michael, “A woman down to her bones: the anatomy of sexual difference in early modern Europe”, Isis, 2003, 94, p. 274-299, https://doi.org/10.1086/379387
Google Scholar

Zacuto Lusitano, Operum tomus primus, Lugduni, sumptibus Ioannis Antonii Huguetani, filii et Marci Antonii Ravaud, 1649
Google Scholar

Zacuto Lusitano, Praxis historiarum liber nonus, in quo curatio muliebrium morborum ubertim expenditur, Amstelodami, Sumptibus Henrici Laurentii Bibliopolae, 1642
Google Scholar

Téléchargements

Publiée

2026-01-29

Comment citer

Pinheiro, C. (2026). La différence sexuelle et l’utérus chez Luis Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro et Zacuto Lusitano. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica, (21), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9065.21.05