Dynamic targets in the acquisition of L2 English vowels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0011Keywords:
Phonetics, Phonology, Vowel Inherent Spectral Change, L2 EnglishAbstract
This paper presents acoustic data on the dynamic properties of the FLEECE and TRAP vowels in the speech of two groups of Polish users of English. Results reveal that the more proficient group users, made up of teachers and professors with professional-level proficiency in English, produce more dramatic patterns of formant movement, reminiscent of native productions, than first year students. It is argued that vowel inherent spectra change (VISC) is an inherent aspect of English phonology, originated in interactions between vowels and neighboring consonants, and later generalized to the vowel system as a whole. By contrast, Polish is a language with a minimal role of VISC. Consequently, successful acquisition of L2 English vowels involves not only the mastery of vowels in F1-F2 space, but also formant trajectories over time.
References
Aperliński, G. and G. Schwartz. 2015. Release bursts vs. formant transitions in Polish stop place perception. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 18 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. 1989. Reflections on the dichotomy stress vs. syllable-timing. Revue de Phonetique Appliquee 91-93. 99-130.
Google Scholar
Best, C. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171-204. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Google Scholar
Best, C. T. and M. D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro and O.-S. Bohn (eds.), Second language speech learning – the role of language experience in speech perception and production, 13-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. 1995. Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 279-304. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. and J. Flege. 1997. Perception and production of a new vowel category by secondlanguage learners. In A. James and J. Leather (eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process, 53-74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Docherty, G. 2010. Phonological innovation in contemporary spoken British English. In A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, 59-75. Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, 337-353. Chicago: CLS 19.
Google Scholar
Draxler, C. and K. Jansch. 2015. SpeechRecorder v. 2.X.X. [Software]. Available from: http://www.bas.unimuenchen.de/Bas/software/speechrecorder/
Google Scholar
Dukiewicz, L. and I. Sawicka 1995. Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego – fonetyka i fonologia [Grammar of modern Polish – phonetics and phonology]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.
Google Scholar
Eager, C. 2015. Automated voicing analysis in Praat: Statistically equivalent to manual segmentation. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 18 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Google Scholar
Escudero, P. and P. Boersma. 2004. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 551-585.
Google Scholar
Fox, R. A. and E. Jacewicz. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126. 2603–2618. doi:10.1121/1.3212921
Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47-65.
Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 233-277. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Google Scholar
Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. and R. Święciński. 2010. Clashes with ashes. In E. Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in Accents of English 2, 213-232. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. and J. Midgley. 2005. Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35/2. 183-199.
Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J. 2013. Static and dynamic approaches to vowel perception. In G. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change, 9-30. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Jekiel, M. 2010. Dynamic information for Polish and English vowels in syllable onsets and offsets. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.
Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J. and W. Strange. 1999. Perception of dynamic information for vowels in syllable onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics 61. 1200–1210.
Google Scholar
Jin, S. H. and C. Liu. 2013. The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (5). 363-369. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4798620.
Google Scholar
Kaźmierski, K. 2014. Are some languages more prone to vowel shifting than others? Paper delivered at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea September 11-14 2014, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Labov, W., S. Ash and C. Boberg. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Lass, N. 1996. Principles of Experimental Phonetics. St. Louis: Mosby.
Google Scholar
Laver, J. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., 1999. American English. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 41-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the HandH theory. In W. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, 403-439. The Netherlands: Kluver Academic.
Google Scholar
Kaźmierski, K. 2015. Vowel-shifting in the English language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Malisz, Z. 2013. Speech rhythm variability in Polish and English – a study of variability in rhythmic levels. PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Morrison, G. 2013. Theories of Vowel Inherent Spectral Change. In G. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change, 31-48. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Morrison, G and P. Assmann (eds.). 2013. Vowel inherent spectral change. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73. 265–292.
Google Scholar
Rogers, C. L., M. Glasbrenner, T. DeMasi and M. Bianchi. 2013. Vowel inherent spectral change and the second language learner. In G. S. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel Inherent Spectral Change, Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing, 231-259. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Rojczyk, A. 2011. Overreliance on duration in nonnative vowel production and perception: The within lax vowel category contrast. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010, vol. 2, 239-249. Bern: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. 2010. Rhythm and vowel quality in accents of English. Research in Language 8. 135-147.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. 2013. A representational parameter for onsetless syllables. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 613-646.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. 2015. Vowel dynamics for Polish learners of English. In: E. Waniek-Klimczak and M. Pawlak (eds.), Teaching and Researching the Pronunciation of English - Studies in Honour of Włodzimierz Sobkowiak, 205-217. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. 2016. On the evolution of prosodic boundaries – parameter settings for Polish and English. Lingua 171. 37-73.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. and G. Aperliński. 2014. The phonology of CV transitions. In E. Cyran and J. Szpyra-Kozłowska (eds.), Crossing Phonetics-Phonology Lines, 277-298. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., Aperliński, G., Jekiel, M. and K. Malarski 2015. Spectral dynamics in L1 and L2 vowel perception. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Native and Nonnative Accents of English, Accents 2015, University of Łodź.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., Balas, A. and A. Rojczyk. 2014. Stop release in Polish English – implications for prosodic constituency. Research in Language 12(2). 131-144.
Google Scholar
Strange, W. 1989. Evolving theories of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85. 2081- 2087.
Google Scholar
Strange, W., Jenkins, J. and T. Johnson. 1983. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34. 695-705.
Google Scholar
Syrdal, A. and H. S. Gopal. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 79(4). 1086-1100.
Google Scholar
Święciński, R. 2004. Articulatory setting in Polish and its implications for teaching English pronunciation to Poles. In W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Zeszyt Naukowy Instytutu Neofilologii Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej w Koninie nr 3, 141-150. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ w Koninie.
Google Scholar
Wagner, P. 2007. Visualising levels of rhythmic organization. Proceedings of ICPhS XVI. Saarbrucken.
Google Scholar
Weckwerth J. 2011. English TRAP vowel in advanced Polish learners: Variation and system typology. In W.-S. Lee and E. Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2110-2113. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Google Scholar
Williams, D. and P. Escudero. 2014. A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(5). 2751-2761.
Google Scholar
White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Calibrating rhythm – first and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics 35. 501-522.
Google Scholar
