Perception of Allophonic Cues to English Word Boundaries by Polish Learners: Approximant Devoicing in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0008Keywords:
word boundary, devoicing, laryngeal coarticulation, allophonic cuesAbstract
The study investigates the perception of devoicing of English /w, r, j, l/ after /p, t, k/ as a word-boundary cue by Polish listeners. Polish does not devoice sonorants following voiceless stops in word-initial positions. As a result, Polish learners are not made sensitive to sonorant devoicing as a segmentation cue. Higher-proficiency and lower-proficiency Polish learners of English participated in the task in which they recognised phrases such as buy train vs. bite rain or pie plot vs. pipe lot. The analysis of accuracy scores revealed that successful segmentation was only above chance level, indicating that sonorant voicing/devoicing cue was largely unattended to in identifying the boundary location. Moreover, higher proficiency did not lead to more successful segmentation. The analysis of reaction times showed an unclear pattern in which higher-proficiency listeners segmented the test phrases faster but not more accurately than lower-proficiency listeners. Finally, #CS sequences were recognised more accurately than C#S sequences, which was taken to suggest that the listeners may have had some limited knowledge that devoiced sonorants appear only in word-initial positions, but they treated voiced sonorants as equal candidates for word-final and word-initial positions.
References
Ainsworth, W. 1986. Pitch change as a cue to syllabification. Journal of Phonetics 14. 257-264.
Google Scholar
Altenberg, E. P. 2005. The perception of word boundaries in second language. Second Language Research 21(4): 325-358.
Google Scholar
Anderson, S. and R. Port. 1994. Evidence for syllable structure, stress and juncture from segmental durations. Journal of Phonetics 22. 283-315.
Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Jenny R. Saffran, and Elissa L. Newport. 1998. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9. 321-324.
Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. and J. Edwards. 1990. Lengthening and shortening and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston and M.. E. Beckman (eds.), Laboratory Phonology I, 152-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bissiri, Maria. P., Maria L. Lecumberri, Martin Cooke and Jan Volin. 2011. The role of wordinitial glottal stops in recognizing English words. Proceedings of Interspeech 2011. Florence, Italy.
Google Scholar
Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 10. 341-345.
Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. 1995. Cross-language speech perception in adults – first language transfer does not tell it all. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage research, 275-300. Baltimore: York Press.
Google Scholar
Boucher, Victor J. 1998. A parameter for syllabification for VstopV and relative timing invariance. Journal of Phonetics 16. 299-326.
Google Scholar
Brent, M. R. and T. A. Cartwright. 1996. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition 61. 93-125.
Google Scholar
Byrd, D. and E. Saltzman. 1998. Intergestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 26. 173-199.
Google Scholar
Christie, W. M. 1977. Some multiple cues for juncture in English. General Linguistics 17. 212-222.
Google Scholar
Cole, J., H. Kim, H. Choi, and M. Hasegawa-Johnson. 2007. Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation. Evidence from Radio News speech. Journal of Phonetics 35. 180-209.
Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., J. Jakimik, and W. E. Cooper. 1980. Segmenting speech into words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64. 1323-1332.
Google Scholar
Cutler, A., J. Mehler, D. Norris and J. Segui. 1986. The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25(4). 385-400.
Google Scholar
Cutler, A., J. Mehler, D. Norris and J. Segui. 1992. The nonlingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology 24. 381-410.
Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. 1974. Syllabification in English words with medial sp, st, sk. Journal of Phonetics 2. 15-45.
Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J. 1992. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. New York: Foris Publications.
Google Scholar
Endress, A. D. and M. D. Hauser. 2010. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognitive Psychology 61. 177-199.
Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. and P. Keating. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domain. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101. 3728-3740.
Google Scholar
Garellek, M. 2014. Voice quality strengthening and glottalization. Journal of Phonetics 45. 106-113.
Google Scholar
Gow, D. W. and P. C. Gordon. 1995. Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21. 344-359.
Google Scholar
Gussman, E. 1992. Resyllabification and delinking. The case of Polish voicing. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 29-56.
Google Scholar
Ito, K. and W. Strange. 2009. Perception of allophonic cues to English word boundaries by Japanese second language learners of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4). 2348-2360.
Google Scholar
Kim, D., J. D. Stephens and M. A. Pitt. 2012. How does context play a part in splitting words apart? Production and perception of word boundaries in casual speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66. 509-529.
Google Scholar
Krakow, R. A. 1993. Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: Syllables, sentences, stress, and speaking rate. In Stephen R. Anderson, Marie. K. Huffman, Rena. A. Krakow and Patricia A. Keating. (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 87-116. San Diego: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1960. An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica 5. 1-54.
Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1972. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51. 2018-2024.
Google Scholar
Mattys, S. L., L. White, and J. F. Melhorn. 2005. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134. 477-500.
Google Scholar
Mehler, J., J. Y. Dommergues, U. Frauenfelder and J. Segui. 1981. The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(3). 298-305.
Google Scholar
Nakatani, L. and K. D. Dukes. 1977. Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62. 714-719.
Google Scholar
Nakatani, L., K. D. O’Connor and C. H. Aston. 1981. Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm. Phonetica 38. 84-106.
Google Scholar
Norris, D., J. M. McQueen, A. Cutler and S. Butterfield. 1997. The possible word-constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 34. 191-243.
Google Scholar
Kimbrough, O. D. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54. 1235-1247.
Google Scholar
Quené, H. 1992. Durational cues for word segmentation in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 20. 331-350.
Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. 1993. Coarticulation and phonology. Language and Speech 36. 155-170.
Google Scholar
Otake, T., G. Hatano, A. Cutler and J. Mehler. 1993. Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 32(2). 258-278.
Google Scholar
Pompino-Marschall, B. and M. Żygis. 2010. Glottal marking of vowel-initial words in German. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 52. 1-17.
Google Scholar
Porzuczek, A., A. Rojczyk and J. Arabski. 2013. Praktyczny kurs wymowy angielskiej dla Polaków. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Redford, M. A. and P. Randall. 2005. The role of juncture cues and phonological knowledge in English syllabification judgments. Journal of Phonetics 33. 27-46.
Google Scholar
Rojczyk, A. 2010. Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the consonant voicing contrast: Perception experiments with Polish-English bilinguals. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (ed.), Issues in accents of English: Variability and norm, 341-360. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. 2013. Vowel hiatus at Polish word boundaries – phonetic realization and phonological implications. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(4). 557-585.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., A. Balas and A. Rojczyk. 2014. External sandhi in L2 segmental phonetics – final (de)voicing in Polish English. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 5. 637-649.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., A. Rojczyk and A. Balas. 2015. Monitoring English sandhi linking – a study of Polish listeners’ L2 perception. Research in Language 13(1). 61-76.
Google Scholar
Shatzman, K. B., and J. M. McQueen. 2006. Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 68(1). 1-16.
Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E. 2014. The exploitation of subphonemic acoustic detail in L2 speech segmentation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(4). 709-731.
Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. and S. Hawkins. 2012. Production and perception of speaker-specific phonetic detail at word boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 40. 213-233.
Google Scholar
Szczepek-Reed, B. 2014. Phonetic practices for action formation: Glottalization versus linking of TCU-initial vowels in German. Journal of Pragmatics 62. 13-29.
Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2000. Word-boundary-related duraton patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28. 397-440.
Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., and L. White. 1999. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 27. 171-206.
Google Scholar
Umeda, N. 1975. Vowel duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 58. 434-445.
Google Scholar
Umeda, N. 1978. Occurance of glottal stops in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64. 88-94.
Google Scholar
Umeda, N. and C. H. Coker. 1975. Subphonemic detail in American English. In G. Fant and M. A. A. Tatham (eds.), Auditory analysis and perception, 539-564. London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
