Phonological Factors Affecting L1 Phonetic Realization of Proficient Polish Users of English

Authors

  • Geoffrey Schwartz Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • Anna Balas
  • Arkadiusz Rojczyk University of Silesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0014

Keywords:

Phonetic parameters, L2 phonetics, VOT, glottalization, sandhi

Abstract

Acoustic phonetic studies examine the L1 of Polish speakers with professional level proficiency in English. The studies include two tasks, a production task carried out entirely in Polish and a phonetic code-switching task in which speakers insert target Polish words or phrases into an English carrier. Additionally, two phonetic parameters are studied: the oft-investigated VOT, as well as glottalization vs. sandhi linking of wordinitial vowels. In monolingual Polish mode, L2 interference was observed for the VOT parameter, but not for sandhi linking. It is suggested that this discrepancy may be related to the differing phonological status of the two phonetic parameters. In the code-switching tasks, VOTs were on the whole more English-like than in monolingual mode, but this appeared to be a matter of individual performance. An increase in the rate of sandhi linking in the code-switches, except for the case of one speaker, appeared to be a function of accelerated production of L1 target items.

References

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2010). Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 640-653.
Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic codeswitching. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 558-570.
Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. Munro & O. S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning – the role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Brunner, J., & Żygis, M. (2012). Why do glottal stops and low vowels like each other? Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 376-379.
Google Scholar

Bullock, B., & Toribio, A. (2009). Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of code-switching. In L. Isurin, D. Winford, & K. De Bot (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code-switching (pp. 189-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Chang, C. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on firstlanguage speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 249-268.
Google Scholar

Cook, A. (2000). American Accent Training. Hauppage, NY: Barrron’s. Cruttenden, A. (2001). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English (6th ed.). London: Arnold.
Google Scholar

Davidson, L., & Erker, D. (2014). Hiatus resolution in American English: the case against glide insertion. Language, 90(2), 482-514.
Google Scholar

Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ostendorf, M. (1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 423-444.
Google Scholar

Dogil, G. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Polish, Lithuanian, Spanish, and German. In H. van der Hulst (Ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp. 273-311). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-65.
Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage research (pp. 233-277). Baltimore: York Press.
Google Scholar

Garellek, M. (2012). Word-initial glottalization and voice quality strengthening. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 111, 92-122.
Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals - methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131-149.
Google Scholar

Grosjean, F., & Miller J. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5, 201-206.
Google Scholar

Harada, T. (2003). L2 influence on L1 speech in the production of VOT. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1085-1088.
Google Scholar

Kraska-Szlenk, I., & Żygis, M. (2012). Phonetic and lexical gradience in the Polish prefixed words. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 317-336.
Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 619-639). Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Major. R. (1992). Losing English as a first language. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 190-208.
Google Scholar

Munro, M. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 193-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Newlin-Łukowicz, L. (2012). Polish Stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology, 29(2), 271-329.
Google Scholar

Olson, D. (2012). The phonetics of insertional code-switching – suprasegmental analysis and a case for hyper-articulation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(4), 439-457.
Google Scholar

Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C.A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 421-436.
Google Scholar

Schwartz, G. (2013). Vowel hiatus at Polish word boundaries – phonetic realization and phonological implications. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 49(4), 557-585.
Google Scholar

Strange, W., & Shafer, V. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: the reeducation of selective perception. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Sypiańska, J. (2013). Quantity and quality of language use and L1 attrition of Polish due to L2 Danish and L3 English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.
Google Scholar

Umeda, N. (1978). Occurrence of glottal stops in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 81-94.
Google Scholar

Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2011). Aspiration and style: a sociophonetic study of VOT in Polish learners of English. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, & M. Kul (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010. Vol 1 (pp. 303-316). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Zampini, M. (2008). L2 speech production research: Findings, issues, and advances. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 219-250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

Schwartz, G., Balas, A., & Rojczyk, A. (2015). Phonological Factors Affecting L1 Phonetic Realization of Proficient Polish Users of English. Research in Language, 13(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0014

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>