Immediate and Distracted Imitation in Second-Language Speech: Unreleased Plosives In English

Arkadiusz Rojczyk; Andrzej Porzuczek; Marcin Bergier

doi:10.2478/v10015-012-0007-7

Authors

Arkadiusz Rojczyk University of Silesia, Poland
Andrzej Porzuczek University of Silesia, Poland
Marcin Bergier University of Silesia, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0007-7

Keywords:

imitation, plosives, unreleased, distraction

Abstract

The paper investigates immediate and distracted imitation in second-language speech using unreleased plosives. Unreleased plosives are fairly frequently found in English sequences of two stops. Polish, on the other hand, is characterised by a significant rate of releases in such sequences. This cross-linguistic difference served as material to look into how and to what extent non-native properties of sounds can be produced in immediate and distracted imitation. Thirteen native speakers of Polish first read and then imitated sequences of words with two stops straddling the word boundary. Stimuli for imitation had no release of the first stop. The results revealed that (1) a non-native feature such as the lack of the release burst can be imitated; (2) distracting imitation impedes imitative performance; (3) the type of a sequence interacts with the magnitude of an imitative effect

References

Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Arbib, M. A. 2005. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 28: 105-167.
Google Scholar

Babel, M. 2010. Dialect convergence and divergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39: 437-456.
Google Scholar

Babel, M. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40: 177-189.
Google Scholar

Bałutowa, B. 1974. Wymowa Angielska dla Wszystkich. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

Bergier, M. 2010. The occurrence of unreleased oral stops in English voice agreeing plosive clusters straddling word boundaries. Production experiments with Polish advanced learners of English. M. A. Thesis. University of Silesia.
Google Scholar

Best, C. T. and W. Strange. 1992. Effects of language-specific phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20: 305-330.
Google Scholar

Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 10: 341-345.
Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y. and H. Giles. 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (ed.) Language, Ethnicity, and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press: 119-136.
Google Scholar

Byrd, D. 1992. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92: 593-596.
Google Scholar

Byrd, D. 1993. 54,000 American stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 83: 1-19.
Google Scholar

Byrne, D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Chambers, J. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language 68: 673-705.
Google Scholar

Coleman, J. 2002. Phonetic representations in the mental lexicon. In J. Durand and B. Laks (eds) Phonetics, Phonology and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 96-130.
Google Scholar

Crystal, T. H. and A. S. House. 1988a. The duration of American-English stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16: 285-294.
Google Scholar

Crystal, T. H. and A. S. House. 1988b Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83: 1553-1573.
Google Scholar

Davidson, L. 2010. Variation in stop releases in American English spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128: 2458.
Google Scholar

Delvaux, V. and A. Soquet. 2007. The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica 64: 145-173.
Google Scholar

Dukiewicz, L. and I. Sawicka. 1995. Fonetyka i fonologia. In H. Wróbel (ed.) Gramatyka i Fonologia Języka Polskiego. Kraków: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.
Google Scholar

Evans, B. G. and P. Iverson. 2007. Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121: 3814-3826.
Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A., J. M. Brown, L. Sabadini and J. Weihing. 2003. Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 396-413.
Google Scholar

Gentilucci, B. R. Bernardis. 2007. Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia 45: 608-615.
Google Scholar

Gentilucci, B. and M. C. Corballis. 2006. From manual gesture to speech: A gradual transition. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 30: 949-960.
Google Scholar

Giles, H., J. Coupland and N. Coupland. 1991. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Gimson, A. C. 2001. Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th edition. Rev. by A. Cruttenden. London: Arnold.
Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D. 1997. Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson and J. W. Mullennix (eds) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press: 33-66.
Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105: 251-279.
Google Scholar

Gregory, S. W. 1990. Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners’ speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 14: 237-251.
Google Scholar

Gregory, S. W., K. Dagan and S. Webster. 1997. Evaluating the relation between vocal accommodation in conversational partners’ fundamental frequencies to perceptions of communication quality. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21: 23-43.
Google Scholar

Gregory, S. W., B. E. Green, R. M. Carrothers and K. A. Dagan. 2001. Verifying the primacy of voice fundamental frequency in social status accommodation. Language Communication 21: 37-60.
Google Scholar

Gregory, S. W. and S. Webster. 1996. A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1231-1240.
Google Scholar

Gregory, S. W., S. Webster and G. Huang. 1993. Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews. Language Communication 13: 195-217.
Google Scholar

Halle, P. A., C. T. Best and A. Levitt. 1999. Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics 27: 281-306.
Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Henderson, J. B. and B. H. Repp. 1982. Is a stop consonant released when followed by another stop consonant? Phonetica 39: 71-82.
Google Scholar

Hintzman, D. L. 1986. "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93: 411-428.
Google Scholar

Honorof, D. N., J. Weihing and C. A. Fowler. 2011. Articulatory events are imitated under rapid shadowing. Journal of Phonetics 39: 18-38.
Google Scholar

Horner, V. and A. Whiten. 2005. Casual knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition 8: 164-181.
Google Scholar

Jamieson, D. G. and D. E. Moroson. 1986. Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/ - /Ɵ/ contrast by francophones. Perception and Psychophysics 40: 205-215.
Google Scholar

Jassem, W. 1974. Fonetyka Języka Angielskiego. 4th edition. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. J. and G. H. Yeni-Komshian. 1995. Cross-language speech perception: Perspective and promise. In W. Strange (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research. York: York Press: 463-479.
Google Scholar

Johnson, K. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson and J. W. Mullennix (eds) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press: 145-166.
Google Scholar

Jones, D. 1956. An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons.
Google Scholar

Kondaurova, M. V. and A. L. Francis. 2008. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124: 3959-3971.
Google Scholar

Kopczyński, A. 1977. Polish and American English Consonant Phonemes. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. and A. N. Meltzoff. 1996. Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2425-2438.
Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 1975. A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
Google Scholar

Mańkowska, A., M. Nowacka and M. Kłoczowska. 2009. "How Much Wood Would a Woodchuck Chuck?": English Pronunciation Practice Book. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WSE.
Google Scholar

McAllister, R., F. E. Flege and T. Piske. 2002. The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 30: 229-258.
Google Scholar

McClaskey, C. L., D. B. Pisoni and T. D. Carrell. 1983. Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing. Perception and Psychophysics 34: 323-330.
Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. and M. Moore. 1999. Persons and representation: Why infant imitation is important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel and G. Butterworth (eds) Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 9-35.
Google Scholar

Mitterer, H. and M. Ernestus. 2008. The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence form the shadowing task. Cognition 109: 168- 173.
Google Scholar

Munro, M. J., T. M. Derwing, J. E. Flege. 1999. Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics 27: 385-403.
Google Scholar

Nagell, K., K. Olguin and M. Tomasello. 1993. Processes of social learning in tool use in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 107: 174-186.
Google Scholar

Namy, L. L., L. C. Nygaard and D. Sauerteig. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal and Language and Social Psychology 21: 422-432.
Google Scholar

Natale, M. 1975. Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 790- 804.
Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. 2011. Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 39: 132-14.
Google Scholar

Nosofsky, R. M. 1986. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115: 39-57.
Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119: 2382-2392.
Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S. 2010. Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. In E. Morsella (ed) Expressing Oneself/Expressing One’s Self. Communication, Cognition, Language, and Identity. New York: Psychology Press: 183-196.
Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S., I. Cajori Jay and R. M. Krauss. 2010. Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 72: 2254-2264.
Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S., R. Gibbons, A. Suppes and R. M. Krauss. 2012. Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40: 190-197.
Google Scholar

Pekkola, J., M. Laasonen, V. Ojanen, T. Autti, L. P. Jaaskelainen, T. Kujala et al. 2006. Perception of matching and conflicting audiovisual speech in dyslexic and fluent readers: An fMRI study at 3T. NeuroImage 29: 797-807.
Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. 2006. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34: 516-530.
Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B., R. N. Aslin, A. J. Perey and B. L. Hennessy. 1982. Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8: 297-314.
Google Scholar

Pruitt, P. and J. van Santen. 2006. Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119: 1684-1696.
Google Scholar

Pulvermuller, F., M. Huss, F. Kherif, F. Moscoso del Prado Martin, O. Hauk and Y. Shtyrov. 2006. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 7865-7870.
Google Scholar

Randolph, M. 1989. Syllable-based Constraints on Properties of English Sounds. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G. and M. A. Arbib. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21: 188-194.
Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G. and L. Craighero. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 21: 169-192.
Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., L. Fogassi and V. Gallese. 2001. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2: 661-670.
Google Scholar

Roach, P. English Phonetics and Phonology. 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Rojczyk, A. 2008. Release burst in Polish homorganic stop geminates. Linguistica Silesiana 29: 75-86.
Google Scholar

Rojczyk, A. 2012a. Spontaneous phonetic imitation of L2 vowels in a rapid shadowing task. Paper presented at Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching 2012. Vancouver Canada, August 24-25 2012.
Google Scholar

Rojczyk, A. 2012b. Phonetic and phonological mode in second-language speech: VOT imitation. Paper presented at EUROSLA 2012, Poznań Poland, September 5-8 2012.
Google Scholar

Schwartz, J-L., A. Basirat, L. Ménard and M. Sato. 2012. The Perception-for-Action- Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25: 336-354.
Google Scholar

Shepard, C. A., H. Giles and B. A. Le Poire. 2001. Communication accommodation theory. In W. P. Robinson and H. Giles (eds) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Shockley, K., L. Sabadini and C. A. Fowler. 2004. Imitation in shadowing words. Perception and Psychophysics 66: 422-429.
Google Scholar

Skipper, J. I., V. Van Wassenhove, H. C. Nusbaum and S. L. Small. 2007. Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cerebral Cortex 17: 2387-2399.
Google Scholar

Sobkowiak, W. 2001. English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
Google Scholar

Street, R. L. and H. Giles. 1982. Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive approach to language and speech behavior. In M. Roloff and C. Berger (eds) Social Cognition and Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. and L. M. Triandis. 1960. Race, social class, religion, and nationality as determinants of social distance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61: 110- 118.
Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 1986. Dialects in Contact. New York: Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar

Whiten, A. and D. M. Custance. 1996. Studies of imitation in chimpanzees and children. In C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef (eds) Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. San Diego: Academic Press: 291-318.
Google Scholar

Wierzchowska, B. 1980. Fonetyka i Fonologia Języka Polskiego. Wrocław: PAN.
Google Scholar

Wilson, S. M. and M. Iacoboni. 2006. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensimotor nature of speech perception. NeuroImage 33: 316-325.
Google Scholar

Wilson, S. M., A. P. Saygin, M. I. Sereno and M. Iacoboni. 2004. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience 7: 701- 702.
Google Scholar