The Effect of IP Constituent Position and Foot Complexity on Timing in Polish Learner's English Pronunciation

Andrzej Porzuczek

doi:10.2478/v10015-010-0007-4

Authors

Andrzej Porzuczek University of Silesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-010-0007-4

Keywords:

FL pronunciation, timing, acquisition, Polish

Abstract

This paper focuses on the effect of prominence level and stress distribution on timing in read English speech of Polish learners. We have measured and analysed the length of IP units distinguished by the traditional British School prosodic description, i.e. preheads, heads and nuclei, as well as stress feet, further divided into stressed and unstressed syllables. A comparison of native and Polish learners' performance shows similar durations of stressed and pitch accented syllables. The unstressed syllables and syllable clusters, on the other hand, are significantly longer in non-native speech, and the discrepancies increase at lower phrasal prominence levels, especially in the preheads. Similar results for both groups have been obtained with respect to the number of consecutive unstressed syllables (foot complexity). The same test repeated after seven months of pronunciation training reveals a considerable tendency towards native speech timing, although the differences concerning low prominence levels remain significant.

References

Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Anisfeld, M., N. Bogo, and W. E. Lambert 1962. Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65, 223-231.
Google Scholar

Arthur, B., D. Farrar and G. Bradford. 1974. Evaluation reactions of college students to dialect differences in the English of Mexican-Americans. Language Speech 17 (3), 255-270. 4465623
Google Scholar

Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 10, 341-345.
Google Scholar

Bouzon, C. and D. Hirst. 2004. Isochrony and Prosodic Structure in British English. In Bel, B. and I. Marlieu (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Speech Prosody. Nara, Japan, 223-226.
Google Scholar

Bryła, A. 2010. Phonetic properties of Euro-English - empirical evidence. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in accents of English 2: Variability and norm. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 37-60.
Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. London: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Dauer, R. 1983. Stress timing and syllable timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11, 51-62.
Google Scholar

Dogil, G. 1995. Phonetic correlates of word stress. Phonetic AIMS. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, 1-60.
Google Scholar

Dogil, G. 1999. The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Lithuanian, Polish, German and Spanish. In: Van der Hulst, H. (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 273-311.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2002. Beats-and-Binding Phonology. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000268778800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar

Felps, D., H. Bortfeld and R. Gutierrez-Osuna. 2009. Foreign accent conversion in computer assisted pronunciation training. Speech Communication 51, 920-932. 21124807 doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.004 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000269092500010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar

Gonet, W., J. Szpyra-Kozłowska and R. Święciński, 2010. The acquisition of Vowel Reduction by Polish students of English. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in Accents of English 2: Variability and Norm. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, 291-308.
Google Scholar

Grabe, E. and E. L. Low. 2003. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Papers in laboratory phonology 7, 515-546.
Google Scholar

Grabe, E., B. Post and F. Nolan. 2001. The IViE Corpus. Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge. http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/IViE
Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. Mouton.
Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Jassem, W. 1952. Intonation in Conversational English. Warsaw, Polish Academy of Science.
Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 1967. Three Areas in Experimental Phonetics, London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Lehiste, I. 1977. Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 5, 253-263
Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, R., 1997. English With an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge
Google Scholar

Munro, M., and T. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning and Technology 45 (1), 73-97.
Google Scholar

Neri, A., C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik, and L. Boves. 2002. The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15 (5), 441-467.
Google Scholar

Nespor, M. 1990. On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In Roca, I. (ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, 157-175.
Google Scholar

Nowacka, M. 2003. ‘Hot bits’ or ‘Hobbits’? - English Speech in Polish Ears. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ w Płocku, 97-113.
Google Scholar

Nowacka, M. 2008. The Phonetic Attainment in Polish University and College Students of English. A Study in the Productive and Receptive Pronunciation Skills. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin.
Google Scholar

Nowak, P. 2006. Vowel reduction in Polish. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. 1965. The perception of time intervals. In: UCL Working Papers in Phonetics and Linguistics 2, 10-15.
Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. Longman, 2 edition.
Google Scholar

Pennington, M. C., 1999. Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning 12, 427-440.
Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. University Press: Michigan.
Google Scholar

Porzuczek, A. 2007. English vowel quantity in Polish learner's speech perception and production. In Arabski, J., D. Gabryś-Barker and A. Łyda (eds.), PASE Papers 2007. Studies in Language and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages. Katowice: PARA, 96-105.
Google Scholar

Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. In Cognition 73, 265-292. 10585517
Google Scholar

Roach, P. 1982. On the distinction between ‘stressed-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D. (ed.), Linguistic Controversies. London: Edward Arnold, 73-79.
Google Scholar

Roach, P. 2002. Studying rhythm and timing in English speech: Scientific curiosity or a classroom necessity? In Waniek-Klimczak, E. and J. Melia (eds.), Accents and Speech in Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 199-206.
Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B. and M. A. Carranza. 1975. Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (5), 855-863.
Google Scholar

Schairer, K. E. 1992. Native speaker reaction to non-native speech. Modern Language Journal 76 (3), 309-319.
Google Scholar

Sobkowiak, W. 1996. English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Bene Nati.
Google Scholar

Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., J. Frankiewicz and W. Gonet. 2002. Aspekty fonetyki angielskiej nauczane w szkołach średnich. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 9-27.
Google Scholar

Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2003. The Lingua Franca Core and the Polish Learner. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 193-210.
Google Scholar

Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2005. Temporal Parameters in Second Language Speech. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2009. Sources of difficulty in the acquisition of English rhythm by Polish learners. In Wysocka, M. (ed.), On language structure, acquisition and teaching. Studies in Honour of Janusz Arabski on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 369-378.
Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in contact. Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Google Scholar

White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Calibrating rhythm: First and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics 35, 501-522. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000252002300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. 2002. Miejsce fonetyki języka angielskiego w szkole. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 29-40.
Google Scholar