Word-final /ɔ̃/ in Greater Poland Polish: A Cumulative Context Effect?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.02Keywords:
Polish, nasal vowels, cumulative context effect, corpus phonologyAbstract
An empirical corpus-based study of the likelihood of realizing the Polish nasal vowel /ɔ̃/ word-finally as [ɔm] (i.e. of 'nasal stopping') is presented. The goal was to verify whether the phenomenon exhibits a cumulative context effect, with words typically occurring in an environment favoring a particular phonetic variant showing higher rates of that variant regardless of environment. The results show that nasal stopping is more likely before stop-initial words than before words beginning in other sounds, if there is no intervening pause. Results with regard to the hypothesis that words typically followed by stops will show higher likelihood of nasal stopping, however, remain inconclusive.
References
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Baranowska, K. (2018). Nasal vowels in English and Polish. A comparative analysis and a sociolinguistic study (Master’s thesis). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
Baranowska, K., & Kaźmierski, K. (2020). Polish word-final nasal vowels: Variation and, potentially, change. Sociolinguistic Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.37918
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Baumann, A., & Ritt, N. (2017). On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: Accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory. Phonology, 34(03), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675717000240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675717000240
Biedrzycki, L. (1978). Fonologia angielskich i polskich rezonantów. Porównanie samogłosek oraz spółgłosek rezonantowych. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Boersma, D., Paul & Weenink. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.41, retrieved 15 Aug 2018 from http://www.praat.org/
Bybee, J. (2017). Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach. Language Variation and Change, 29(03), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000199
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Dubisz, S., Karaś, H., & Kolis, N. (1995). Dialekty i gwary polskie. Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna.
Dukiewicz, L. (1967). Polskie głoski nosowe. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Dukiewicz, L., & Sawicka, I. (1995). Fonetyka i fonologia. Cracow: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.
Dunaj, B. (2006). Zasady poprawnej wymowy polskiej. Język Polski, 3, 161–172.
Eddington, D., & Channer, C. (2010). American English has goʔ a loʔ of glottal stops: Social diffusion and linguistic motivation. American Speech, 85(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-019
Forrest, J. (2017). The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING). Language Variation and Change, 29(02), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000072
Fromont, R., & Hay, J. (2012). LaBB-CAT: An Annotation store. In Proceedings of the australasian language technology association workshop (pp. 113–117). Dunedin, New Zealand.
Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035
Gruchmanowa, M. (2006). Językoznawcze wędrówki nie tylko po Poznaniu. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk.
Gussmann, E. (2007). The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarosz, G., Calamaro, S., & Zentz, J. (2016). Input frequency and the acquisition of syllable structure in polish. Language Acquisition, 24(4), 361–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1179743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1179743
Jarosz, G., & Johnson, J. A. (2013). The richness of distributional cues to word boundaries in speech to young children. Language Learning and Development, 9(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.641904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.641904
Kaźmierski, K., Kul, M., & Zydorowicz, P. (2019). Educated Poznań speech 30 years later. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 136(4), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.021.11314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.021.11314
Kul, M., Zydorowicz, P., & Kaźmierski, K. (2020). The Greater Poland Spoken Corpus: Data collection, structure and application. In M. Wrembel, A. Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, & P. Gąsiorowski (Eds.), Approaches to the study of sound structure and speech. Interdisciplinary work in honour of katarzyna dziubalska-kołaczyk (pp. 198–212). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321757-15
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99001776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
Madejowa, M. (1987). Współczesna polska norma językowa w zakresie wymowy samogłosek nosowych. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia, 1, 31–56.
Madelska, L. (2005). Słownik wariantywności fonetycznej współczesnej polszczyzny. Cracow: Collegium Columbinum.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4
Ostaszewska, D., & Tambor, J. (1990). Fonetyka i fonologia współczesnego języka polskiego. Warsaw: PWN.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. ROA-537.
Raymond, W. D., Brown, E. L., & Healy, A. F. (2016). Cumulative context effects and variant lexical representations: Word use and English final t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change, 28(02), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394516000041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394516000041
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Seyfarth, S. (2014). Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition, 133(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013
Strycharczuk, P., & Scobbie, J. M. (2016). Gradual or abrupt? The phonetic path to morphologisation. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.003
Tanner, J., Sonderegger, M., & Wagner, M. (2017). Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.96
Wiśniewski, M. (2000). Zarys fonetyki i fonologii współczesnego języka polskiego. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Witaszek-Samborska, M. (1985). Regionalizmy fonetyczne w mowie inteligencji poznańskiej. Slavia Occidentalis, 17, 91–104.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
