“I’m Not a Musician, But…”: Negotiating the Research Process in Examining the Lives of Musicians

Michael Ramirez

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.10.3.04

Authors

Michael Ramirez Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.3.04

Keywords:

Autoethnography, Reflexivity, Identity Politics, Researcher Identity, Insider–Outsider, Research Relationships, Positionality

Abstract

Identity politics have been of considerable interest to the qualitative research tradition as researchers have speculated on the extent to which identity and positionality matter in the field. In this autoethnography, I analyze private writings I composed while studying musicians’ life course trajectories in musical careers, paying particular attention to the methodological implications of my fieldwork decisions. I concentrate on: 1) issues of access, 2) identity politics, and 3) the ethics of relationships in the field. I analyze the extent to which I negotiated several (sometimes conflicting) ways I presented my identity in different settings and among different populations. My presentation of self-strategies – sometimes intentional, other times haphazard – allowed me successful entrée to the music world, though I remained an outsider within. I conclude with methodological implications highlighting the ways researchers’ identities may influence the research process and suggestions for qualitative researchers to consider in future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michael Ramirez, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, U.S.A.

Michael Ramirez is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Coordinator of the Women’s and Gender Studies Program at Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi. He teaches courses on gender, work, the life course, and film. His research interests include gender, the life course, and identity.

References

Adler, Patricia A. and Peter Adler. 2012. “Keynote Address. Tales From the Field: Reflections on Four Decades of Ethnography.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):10-32.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.02

Allen, Louisa. 2005. “Managing Masculinity: Young Men’s Identity Work in Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research 5(1):35-57.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105048650

Arnold, Bruce L. 2006. “Anticipatory Dying: Reflections Upon End of Life Experiences in a Thai Buddhist Hospice.” Qualitative Sociology Review 2(2):21-41.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.2.03

Behar, Ruth. 1997. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar

Berger, Leigh. 2001. “Inside Out: Narrative Autoethnography as a Path Toward Rapport.” Qualitative Inquiry 7:504-518.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700407

Brooks, Matthew. 2006. “Man-to-Man. A Body Talk Between Male Friends.” Qualitative Inquiry 11:185-207.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405282796

Buford May, Reuben A. 2003. “‘Flirting With Boundaries’: A Professor’s Narrative Tale Contemplating Research on the Wild Side.” Qualitative Inquiry 9:442-465.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403009003007

Couture, Amanda L., Arshia U. Zaidi, and Eleanor Maticka- Tyndale. 2012. “Reflexive Accounts: An Intersectional Approach to Exploring the Fluidity of Insider/Outsider Status and the Researcher’s Impact on Culturally Sensitive Post-Positivist Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):86-105.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.05

Day, Suzanne. 2012. “A Reflexive Lens: Exploring Dilemmas of Qualitative Methodology Through the Concept of Reflexivity.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):60-85.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.04

Egeberg Holmgren, Linn. 2011. “Cofielding in Qualitative Interviews: Gender, Knowledge, and Interaction in a Study of (Pro)Feminist Men.” Qualitative Inquiry 17:364-378.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411401199

Ellis, Carolyn. 2000. “Creating Criteria: An Ethnographic Short Story.” Qualitative Inquiry 6(2):273-277.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600210

Ellis, Carolyn. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar

Ellis, Carolyn and Arthur Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” Pp. 733-768 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Gailey, Jeannine A. and Ariane Prohaska. 2011. “Power and Gender Negotiations During Interviews with Men About Sex and Sexually Degrading Practices.” Qualitative Research 11:365-380.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404315

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Haney, Lynne. 1996. “Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance.” American Sociological Review 61:759-778.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096452

Harvey, Laura. 2011. “Intimate Reflections: Private Diaries in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 11:664-682.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111415959

Hill Collins, Patricia. 1986. “Learning From the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems 33:14-32.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.6.03a00020

Holmes, Mary. 2010. “The Loves of Others: Autoethnography and Reflexivity in Researching Distance Relationships.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(2):89-104.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.04

Kaplan Daniels, Arlene. 1999. “Standing on the Threshold and Tripping: Awkwardness in Becoming a Field-Worker.” Pp. 169- 180 in Qualitative Sociology as Everyday Life, edited by B. Glassner, R. Hertz. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Kleinman, Sherryl. 1999. “Essaying the Personal: Making Sociological Stories Stick.” Pp. 19-29 in Qualitative Sociology as Everyday Life, edited by B. Glassner, R. Hertz. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2653992

Lincoln, Yvonna S. 1995. “Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 1:275-289.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301

McCorkel, Jill. A. and Kristen Myers. 2003. “What Difference Does Difference Make?: Position and Privilege in the Field.” Qualitative Sociology 26:199-231.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022967012774

Mikecz, Robert. 2012. “Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues.” Qualitative Inquiry 18:482-493.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412442818

Pini, Barbara. 2005. “Interviewing Men: Gender and the Collection and Interpretation of Qualitative Data.” Journal of Sociology 42(2):201-216.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783305053238

Rawlins, William K. 1992. Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics, and the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Razon, Na’amah and Karen Ross. 2012. “Negotiating Fluid Identities: Alliance-Building in Qualitative Interviews.” Qualitative Inquiry 18:494-503.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412442816

Reed-Danahay, Deborah. 1997. Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. New York: Berg Publishers.
Google Scholar

Richardson, Laurel. 2000. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” Pp. 923-948 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Sallee, Margaret W. and Frank Harris III. 2011. “Gender Performance in Qualitative Studies of Masculinities.” Qualitative Research 11:409-429.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404322

Sjöstedt Landén, Angelika. 2011. “From Ethnographic ‘Self’-Discovery to Process of Identification.” Qualitative Research 11(5):536-551.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413238

Spry, Tami. 2001. “Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis.” Qualitative Inquiry 7:706-732.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700605

Swartz, Sharlene. 2011. “‘Going Deep’ and ‘Giving Back’: Strategies for Exceeding Ethical Expectations When Researching Amongst Vulnerable Youth.” Qualitative Research 11:47-68.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110385885

Ticineto Clough, Patricia. 2000. Autoaffection: Unconscious Thought in the Age of Teletechnology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Tillmann-Healy, Lisa M. 2003. “Friendship as Method.” Qualitative Inquiry 9:729-749.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254894

West, Lois A. 2001. “Negotiating Masculinities in North American Drinking Subcultures.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 9:371-392.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0903.371