Nowe spojrzenia na starą teorię. Kilka uwag o koncepcji społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2543-9421.09.05Słowa kluczowe:
społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni, teoria miejska, prawo do miasta, urbanizm cyfrowy, praktyki przestrzenneAbstrakt
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza ewolucji teorii społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni oraz refleksja nad jej aktualnością i zastosowaniem we współczesnych studiach miejskich. Prezentujemy rozwój tej koncepcji od fundamentalnych idei Henriego Lefebvre’a, poprzez ich rozwinięcia i reinterpretacje, aż po najnowsze ujęcia uwzględniające wyzwania ery cyfrowej. W naszych rozważaniach wskazujemy na potencjał teorii w analizie współczesnych zjawisk urbanistycznych, jednocześnie identyfikując wyzwania, przed którymi stoi. Konkludujemy, że pomimo wyzwań związanych z operacjonalizacją niektórych koncepcji, teoria społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni pozostaje nie tylko aktualnym, ale i cennym narzędziem analitycznym, zdolnym do uchwycenia złożoności współczesnych procesów miejskich, pod warunkiem jej ciągłej aktualizacji i krytycznej refleksji nad jej metodologią.
Bibliografia
Agrawal, S. (red.). (2022). Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice. University of Alberta Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781772126716
Alizadeh, T., Prasad, D. (2024). The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 61(3), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167
Althorpe, C., Horak, M. (2023). The end of the right to the city: A radical-cooperative view. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
Ash, J., Kitchin, R., Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
Astuti, W.K., Herlambang, S. (2021). Ordinary fragmentation: Network secession of urban centers in Jakarta. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 32(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/ 10.5614/JPWK.2021.32.3.4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2021.32.3.4
Bannister, J., O’Sullivan, A. (2021). Big Data in the city. Urban Studies, 58(15), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980 211014124
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211014124
Barns, S. (2020). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8
Blokland, T., Schultze, H. (2017). Belonging, conviviality or public familiarity? Making sense of urbanity in rapidly transforming neighbourhoods through the lens of Berlin and Rotterdam. W: M. Smagacz-Poziemska, K. Frysztacki i A. Bukowski (red.), Re-imagining the city: Municipality and urbanity today from a sociological perspective (s. 243–264). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/E/17.7265
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/e/17.7265
Borch, C., Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780597
Borsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., Vitálišová, K. (2018). Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications. Cities, 78, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010
Brenner, N. (2019). New urban spaces: Urban theory and the scale question. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190627188.001.0001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190627188.001.0001
Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., Mayer, M. (red.). (2011). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802182
Brenner, N., Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Brighenti, A.M., Pavoni, A. (2023). On urban trajectology: Algorithmic mobilities and atmocultural navigation. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044
Bronsvoort, I., Uitermark, J.L. (2022). Seeing the street through Instagram: Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539
Caprotti, F., Chang, I.-C.C., Joss, S. (2022). Beyond the smart city: A typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transformations, 4, artykuł 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9
Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., Kitchin, R. (red.). (2019). The right to the smart city. Emerald Group Publishing.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787691391
Clark, T.N. (red.). (2004). Research in urban policy: T. 9: The city as an entertainment machine. Elsevier/JAI.
Google Scholar
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
Domaradzka, A. (2018). Urban social movements and the right to the city: An introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-018-0030-Y
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0030-y
Evans, G. (2024). Cultural spaces, production and consumption. Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003216537
Fainstein, S.S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Ferreri, M., Sanyal, R. (2018). Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3353–3368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982
Fields, D. (2022). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 160–181. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X19846514
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19846514
Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815
Gordon, E., de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340679
Gottdiener, M. (1985). The social production of urban space. University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2013). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x
Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2022). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. W: S. Carta (red.), Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design (s. 341–366). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.CH27
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch27
Graham, S. (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242
Graham, S., Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202
Graham, S., Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006
Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159
Harvey, D. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.
Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2018). City (wyd. 2). Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315471259
Iveson, K. (2017). Digital labourers of the city, unite! W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 20–23). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rightsto-the-city/
Google Scholar
Jałowiecki, B. (2010). Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni. Wydanie nowe poprawione. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. (2011). The programmable city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806com
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806com
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
Kitchin, R., Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5039/Code-SpaceSoftware-and-Everyday-Life
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
Leary-Owhin, M.E. (2016). Exploring the production of urban space: Differential space in three post-industrial cities. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447305750
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447305750
Lees, L., Shin, H.B. López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la société, 6, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Lemos, A. (2008). Mobile communication and new sense of places: A critique of spatialization in cyberculture. Revista Galáxia 16, 91–108.
Google Scholar
Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(9), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
Löw, M. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286
Löw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-8096072-bf5130e0f8.pdf
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-69568-3
Low, S.M. (2003). Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959
Low, S.M. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
Google Scholar
Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319
Massey, D.B. (2005). For space. SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., Silver, J. (2017). Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175
Middha, B., McShane, I. (2022). E-gentrification: Digital community engagement, urban change and digital rights to the city. W: S. Hovik, G.A. Giannoumis, K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, J.M. Ruano, I. McShane i S. Legard (red.), Citizen participation in the information society: Comparing participatory channels in urban development (s. 141–165). Palgrave Macmillan; Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Mörtenböck, P., Mooshammer, H. (2020). Platform urbanism: City-making in the age of platforms. W: P. Mörtenböck i H. Mooshammer (red.), Data publics: Public plurality in an era of data determinacy (s. 169–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12
Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
O’Sullivan, D., Manson, S.M. (2015). Do physicists have geography envy? And what can geographers learn from it? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P.N., Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034
Purcell, M. (2017). The city is ours (if we decide it is). W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 30–33). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/ourdigitalrights-to-the-city/
Google Scholar
Purcell, M. (2022). Everyday code: The project for democracy on our ‘desktop’. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 1–9, artykuł 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035
Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025
Romanelli, M. (2021). Driving smart cities through smart projects. W: D. Cagáňová, N. Horňáková, J. Papula, K. Stachová i L. Kohnová (red.), Management trends in the context of industry 4.0. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264
Rossi, U., Di Bella, A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C., Kallenberger, P., Kockelkorn, A., Sawyer, L., Streule, M., Wong, K.P. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies, 55(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750
Schwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P. (2008). The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005
Shaw, J., Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312
Shaw, J., Graham, M. (red.). (2017). Our digital rights to the city. Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digitalrights-to-the-city/
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58704/xv4f-pw32
Shelton, T. (2017). Re-politicizing data. W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 24–27). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rights-to-the-city/
Google Scholar
Shields, R. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Soja, E.W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
Soja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Soja, E.W. (2011). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory (wyd. 2). Verso.
Google Scholar
Staeheli, L.A., Mitchell, D. (2007). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Townsend, A.M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, D., Weisler, A. (2018). Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038
Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752
Zook, M.A., Graham, M. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 34(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1068/B3311
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b3311
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
