The battle for differentiated integration in the EU energy policy

Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse

doi:10.18778/1427-9657.11.15

Authors

Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-8900

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.11.15

Keywords:

differentiated integration, Nord Stream 2, OPAL, the EU

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to describe differentiated integration in the EU energy policy which concerns the exemption of the Nord Stream 2 and OPAL pipelines from European law, and more precisely from the so-called Third Energy Package. The attempt to derogate EU law in relation to these pipelines in Germany was of great economic and political importance for Central Europe as a whole. It also affected the modification of EU law and thus had systemic consequences for the entire EU. In this article, I will analyse the process aimed at derogation from the application of European law and its consequences. Furthermore, I will try to answer the question to what extent the public discussion hindered the possibilities of exemption from European law. Finally, I will turn to clarifying the reasons why exclusion from EU law in the case under review has failed. This seems to be of great importance when explaining other failed attempts to diversify integration in recent years as well; it may also help delineate what limitations there are for the very process in the future.

References

Bickerton, C. 2019. The Limits of Differentiation: Capitalist Diversity and Labour Mobility as Drivers of Brexit. Com-parative European Politics 17(2), pp. 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00160-x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00160-x

Bundesnetzagentur. 2017. Reply to letter of Director General Dominique Ristori. Bonn 24 February, https://euractiv.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/03/German-regulator-on-Nord-Stream-2.pdf (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Bundesnetzagentur. 2020. No derogation from regulation for Nord Stream 2. Bonn 15 May.
Google Scholar

C-72/83, Judgments of 10 July 1984, Campus Oil and Others (EU:C:1984:256).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.1984.10383491

C 348/20 P, Judgments of 12 July 2022, Nord Stream 2 v Parliament and Council (EU:C:2019:438).
Google Scholar

C 503/99, Judgments of 4 June 2002, Commission v Belgium (EU:C:2002:328).
Google Scholar

C 848/19 P, Judgments of 15 July 2021, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (EU:C:2021:598).
Google Scholar

Commission’s Legal Service 2016. Legal Consequences of applying the Third Energy Package to offshore import pipe-lines, in particular Nord Stream 2.
Google Scholar

Council’s Legal Service 2017. Opinion of the Legal Service of the Council of the European Union – Recommendation for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations on an agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation on the operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
Google Scholar

De Witte, B. 2018. An Undivided Union? Differentiated Integration in post-Brexit Times. Common Market Law Review 55(2–3), pp. 227–250. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018065
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018065

Deutsche Welle. 2018. France’s President Emmanuel Macron backs sanctions on EU states refusing migrants, 23.06., https://www.dw.com/en/frances-president-emmanuel-macron-backs-sanctions-on-eu-states-refusing-migrants/a-44363945 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. OJ L 211, 14.08.2009, pp. 94–136.
Google Scholar

Engel, H., Purta, M., Speelman, E., Szarek, G., van der Pluijm, P. 2020. Carbon-neutral Poland 2050. Turning a chal-lenge into an opportunity. Warsaw: McKinsey & Company.
Google Scholar

EUobserver. 2021. Germany leads push to stop EU gas funding. 2.06.2021, https://euobserver.com/tickers/152020 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

European Commission. 2017. Commission Seeks a Mandate from Member States to Negotiate with Russia an Agre-ement on Nord Stream, IP/17/1571.
Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2015. “Energy Union: Nord Stream and Involving EP – Statement from ITRE Chair Buzek”, November 18.
Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2016. European Parliament Resolution of 25 October 2016 on EU Strategy for Liquefied Natu-ral Gas and Gas Storage, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0406_EN.html?redirect (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2018. Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas.
Google Scholar

Formuszewicz, R., Kardaś, Sz. 2020. Nord Stream 2 – rosyjsko-niemiecka gra o wyłączenie spod prawa unijnego [Nord Stream 2 – Russian-German Game for Exemption from EU Law]. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, 30.04., https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/komentarze-osw/2020-04-30/nord-stream-2-rosyjsko-niemiecka-gra-o-wylaczenie-spod-prawa (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Gabriel, S., Kern, Ch. 2017. Statement on the Imposition of Russia Sanctions by the US Senate. 15 June, https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/170615-kern-russland/290666 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

German Federal Government. 2018. Press Release on Polish Prime Minister’s Visit. 16 February, https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/EN/Artikel/2018/02_en/2018-02-16-morawiecki-in-berlin_en.html?nn=709674 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Gotev, G. 2019. France ‘Steps on the Gas’ in Eurobudget Talks. EURACTIV.com, https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/france-steps-on-the-gas-in-eurobudget-talks/ (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Grosse, T.G. 2018. Germany’s strategy and tactics towards the crisis in European integration. In: K. Czerska-Shaw, M. Galent, B. Gierat-Bieroń (eds.). Visions and Revisions of Europe. Goettingen: Goettingen University Press, pp. 9–24.
Google Scholar

Gstöhl, S., Frommelt, C. 2017. Back to the Future? Lessons of Differentiated Integration from the EFTA Countries for the UK’s Future Relations with the EU. Social Sciences 6(4), pp. 121–138, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040121
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040121

Hancher, L., Talus, K., Wüstenberg, M. 2021. Retrospective application of legal rules in the European Union: recent practice in the energy sector. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 39(1), pp. 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2020.1804712
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2020.1804712

Jong de, M., Van de Graaf, T. 2021. Lost in Regulation: Nord Stream 2 and the Limits of the European Commission’s Geo-Economic Power. Journal of European Integration 43(4), pp. 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1800680
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1800680

Jong de, M., Van de Graaf, T., Haesebrouck, T. 2020. A matter of preference: Taking sides on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1858763
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1858763

Jirušek, M. 2020. The attitude of the Visegrad Group Countries towards Russian Infrastructural Projects in the gas sector. Energy Policy 139, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111340
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111340

Khan, M., Brunsden, J. 2019. Poland risks losing EU funds over climate stance, warns Macron. Financial Times, 13.12., https://www.ft.com/content/560feece-1d06-11ea-97df-cc63de1d73f4 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Kříž, Z., Urbanovská, J., Brajerčíková, S. 2021. Refugees, Energiewende and NATO deterrence: limits of German lea-dership in Central Europe. European Security 30(1), pp. 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1795836
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1795836

Leruth, B., Gänzle, S., Trondal, T. 2019a. Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(6), pp. 1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12957
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12957

Leruth, B., Gänzle, S., Trondal, J. 2019b. Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post‐Brexit European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(5), pp. 1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869

Maas, H. 2018. Speech at the Tiergarten Conference of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 27 June, https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/maas-fes-tiergarten-konferenz/2113728 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Martill,, B. 2021. Unity over diversity? The politics of differentiated integration after Brexit Journal of European Inte-gration. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877285
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877285

Martill, B., Sus, M. 2018. Post-Brexit EU/UK Security Cooperation: NATO, CSDP+, or ‘French Connection’? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(4), pp. 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118796979
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118796979

Olsen, G.R. 2011. How Strong Is Europeanisation, Really? the Danish Defence Administration and the Opt-Out from the European Security and Defence Policy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12(1), pp. 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.546141
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.546141

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 March 2021 Case C 848/19 P, Federal Re-public of Germany v. Republic of Poland, European Commission.
Google Scholar

Paterson, W. 2018. Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe. In: B. Martill, U. Staiger (eds.). Britain’s Singular Other: Germany and the Brexit Crisis. London: UCL Press, pp. 88–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krxf8.15
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krxf8.15

Pisani-Ferry, J., Röttgen, N., Sapir, A., Tucker, P., Wolff, G.B. 2016. Europe after Brexit: A Proposal for A Continental Partnership. Bruegel Working Paper, https://ridiam.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/9.-Europe-after-brexit-Bruegel.pdf (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

President of Russia. 2015. Vladimir Putin Met with Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Economic Affairs and Energy of Germany Sigmar Gabriel. October 28, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50582 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Proedrou, F. 2020. Behind the EU’s Energy and Climate Policy Conundrum: Erroneous Power Toolbox, Deadlocks and the Way Forward. Journal of Common Market Studies 58(2), pp. 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12925
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12925

Puls Biznesu. 2006, Sikorski: Niemcy nie są solidarne w sprawie Gazociągu Północnego [Sikorski: Germany Fails to Show Solidarity on the Northern Gas Pipeline], 30.04.2006, https://www.pb.pl/sikorski-niemcy-nie-sa-solidarne-w-sprawie-gazociagu-polnocnego-313276 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Rohr von, M., 2021. Unser peinlichstes außenpolitisches Problem heißt Nord Stream 2. Der Spiegel 5, 29.01., https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/nord-stream-2-warum-sich-deutschland-von-der-pipeline-verabschieden-sollte-a-00000000-0002-0001-0000-000175089022 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Saryusz-Wolski, J. 2021. Ukraina musi się przygotowywać do najgorszego możliwego scenariusza, czyli do wojny. My też. Jesteśmy w imadle [Ukraine must prepare for the worst possible scenario, namely war. So do we. We are in a vice-like grip]. wPolityce.pl, 24.07.2021, https://wpolityce.pl/swiat/559916-saryusz-wolskiukraina-musi-przygotowac-sie-do-wojny-my-tez (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F. 2018. Brexit: Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 25(8), pp. 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954

Schimmelfennig, F. 2019. The Choice for Differentiated Europe: An Intergovernmentalist Theoretical Framework. Comparative European Politics 17(2), pp. 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00166-5
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00166-5

Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B. 2015. The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy 22(6): 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835

Schmidt, V.A. 2019. The Future of Differentiated Integration: A ‘Soft-core,’ Multi-clustered Europe of Overlapping Policy Communities. Comparative European Politics 17(2): 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00164-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00164-7

Schmidt-Felzmann, A. 2020. Gazprom’s Nord Stream 2 and diffuse authority in the EU: managing authority chal-lenges regarding Russian gas supplies through the Baltic Sea. Journal of European Integration 42(1), pp. 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708344
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708344

Sheppard, D., 2021. Why some see the hand of Russia in Europe’s gas price crisis. Financial Times, 18 September, https://www.ft.com/content/5ec6b18d-c855-408d-acad-cb5779d101a8 (accessed 27.09.2021).
Google Scholar

Siddi, M., 2016. The EU’s Energy Union: A Sustainable Path to Energy Security? The International Spectator 51(1), pp. 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1090827
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1090827

Siddi, M. 2020. Theorising conflict and cooperation in EU-Russia energy relations: ideas, identities and material factors in the Nord Stream 2 debate. East European Politics 36(4), pp. 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1700955
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1700955

Siddi, M., Kustova, I. 2021. From a liberal to a strategic actor: the evolution of the EU’s approach to international energy governance. Journal of European Public Policy 28(7), pp. 1076–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918219
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918219

Sikorski, R. 2015. Sikorski: PiS sprzeciwiał się Nord Stream, a mógł się przyłączyć. Biznes Alert, October 20, https://biznesalert.pl/sikorski-pis-sprzeciwial-sie-nord-stream-a-mogl-sie-przylaczyc/ (accessed 27.07.2022).
Google Scholar

Sikorski, R. 2021. Nord Stream 2 – jeśli nie możesz kogoś pokonać, powinieneś się do niego przyłączyć. Liberte!, July 29, https://liberte.pl/nord-stream-2-jesli-nie-mozesz-kogos-pokonac-powinienes-sie-do-niego-przylaczyc/ (ac-cessed 27.07.2022).
Google Scholar

Strategic Comments. 2021. The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and Germany’s relationship with Russia. The Internatio-nal Institute for Strategic Studies 27, Comment 9, May, https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/2021/nord-stream-2-gas-pipeline-germany-russia (accessed 27.07.2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2021.1929494
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2021.1929494

Szymanski, K. 2016. Russia’s Gas Pipeline Threatens European Unity. Financial Times, 21 October, https://www.ft.com/content/25a17928-96c3-11e6-a1dc-bdf38d484582 (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Šefčovič, M., 2016. Speech by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič on “Nord Stream II – Energy Union at the crossroads.
Google Scholar

Tomaszewski, K. 2017. Wpływ inwestycji infrastrukturalnych w sektorze gazowym na bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej [The influence of infrastructure investments in the gas sector on energy security in Central and Eastern Europe]. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne 3, pp. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2017.3.4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2017.3.4

Turner, E., Glencross, A., Bilcik, V., Green, S. 2019. Negotiating as One Europe or Several? the Variable Geometry of the EU’s Approach to Brexit. Contemporary Social Science 14(2), pp. 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1492145
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1492145

US Department of State. 2021. Joint Statement of the United States and Germany on Support for Ukraine, European Energy Security, and our Climate Goals, July 21, https://www.state.gov/joint-statement-of-the-united-states-and-germany-on-support-for-ukraine-european-energy-security-and-our-climate-goals/ (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Waszczykowski, W. 2016. Op-ed for the Frankfurt Allgemeine Zeitung. The today and tomorrow of European inte-gration: Warsaw’s perspective, 4 April, https://mfa.gov.pl/en/news/minister-witold-waszczykowski-for-faz-the-today-and-tomorrow-of-european-integration-warsaws-perspective (accessed 27.07.2021).
Google Scholar

Zachmann G. 2016. Nord Stream 2: a bad deal for Germany and Eastern Europe. Bruegel, July 18, https://www.bruegel.org/2016/07/nord-stream-2-a-bad-deal-for-germany-and-eastern-europe/ (accessed 27.07.2022).
Google Scholar