Ostrogi krzesłowate w okresie wpływów rzymskich – stan i potrzeby badań

Autor

  • Emilia Smółka-Antkowiak Uniwesytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Historyczny, Instytut Archeologii, Collegium Historicum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.31.02

Słowa kluczowe:

okres wpływów rzymskich, młodszy okres przedrzymski, ostrogi, ostrogi krzesłowate, Celtowie, Trewerowie, Germanie nadłabscy, kultura wielbarska, kultura przeworska, ostrogi kabłąkowe

Abstrakt

In the Roman Iron Age can be observed the development of spurs production by the barbarian communities in Central Europe. Spurs were disseminated by Celts, then were gladly used and modified by local people. Their initial form were certainly bow-shaped spurs. But there were also chair-shaped spurs, which were derived from bow-shaped form. Through the work of numerous researchers we have more and vaster, but still incomplete knowledge about these monuments.
With a high degree of certainty we can talk about development of forms of these monuments. Their development from bow-shaped forms perfectly shows spurs with three circular plates, so called Dreikreisplattensporen. First items of this type come from the fifth / fourth decade of the first century BC, which makes them the oldest form of rivet spurs. Their genetic zone is connected with area occupied by the Celtic tribe of Treveri. They are therefore not, as previously thought, germanic, but celtic product. However, thanks to the Elbe Germanic these spurs disseminated in the area covered by the settlement of tribes belonging to the Germanic circle of civilization. However, must be noted that in Treveri area at the same time we have to deal with three wholly distinct communities – Terveri (Celts), Suebi (Germans) and Romans. So it is not obvious who had the idea to initiate production of rivet spurs. Detailed analysis of these early forms of spurs, could bring measurable effects for our understanding of real origin of this monuments. It could also help to point trails which these monuments were further redistributed into the Germanic zone, and thus also the areas of the Polish lands. From the land occupied by the Przeworsk culture, there are two specimens of so called Dreikreisplattensporen, from Korytnica, grave 4 and Zakrzewo, grave 14. They can be classified as a Geoblingen-Thür type by Bockius. They are found mainly in Treveri area, but similar also occur in the area of the Grossromstedt culture. Here are considered as the imitation rather than Celtic import. The issue of provenience of these spurs is still unresolved.
In the Roman Iron Age significantly increased the number and diversity of chairshaped spurs produced in the Germania Magna. Their development during this period is no doubt related to the germanic communities, which inhabited the area extending along an axis running from the Jutland Peninsula to the Elbe River basin, where these monuments are the most common. An interesting phenomenon is the presence of imitation parts of chair-shaped spurs observed in the bow-shaped spurs. Such similarity is visible between the chair-shaped spurs with highly separate prick and bow-shaped spurs of Wielbark culture.
In conclusion, currently, despite the existence of several separate classifications of chair-shaped spurs, using them is significantly hampered. These difficulties are due to e.g. no longer current findings. This is caused by increase of data base or deficiencies such as the presentation of incomplete catalog. Difficulties in classifying stem not only from restrictions on the use of existing typologies, but also from a large variety of chairshaped spurs. Correct classification of these monuments, the ability to precisely determine their chronology and the creation of their full catalog is the basis for comprehensive research, covering the entire area of distribution of chair-shaped spurs. They would give the opportunity to lead the direction of the distribution of spurs; trails, which reach among others on the Polish lands. This research would show the directions of interregional contacts. Next step would be thinking of which social processes led to the dissemination of this type of findings on the Elbe and southern Scandinavia areas and further spreading of such spurs in the East. 

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Andrzejowski J., Rakowski T., Watemborska K. (2011), Grób z ostrogami z nekropoli kultury wielbarskiej w Jatryporach nad Liwcem, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne”, t. 62, s. 49–63.
Google Scholar

Bantelmann N. (1971), Hamfelde, Kreis Herzogtum Lauenburg. Ein Urnenfeld der römischen Kaiserzeit in Holstein, „Offa-Bücher”, t. 24.
Google Scholar

Blume E.(1912), Die germanischen Stämme zwischen Oder und Passarge zur römisch Kaserzeit, t. 1, Würzburg.
Google Scholar

Beltz R. (1920/21), Das Urnenfeld von Körchow, „Jahrbücher des Vereins für Meckburgische Geschichte und Altertumskunde”, t. 85.
Google Scholar

Bockius R. (1991), Zu den elbgermanischen Kreisplattensporen der frühen römischen Kaiserzeit, „Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz”, t. 38, s. 497–514.
Google Scholar

Bohnak T. (2004), Zróżnicowanie typologiczne ostróg oraz bojowe zastosowanie konia kulturze przeworskiej w młodszym okresie przedrzymskim, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytet Rzeszowskiego”, Archeologia 1, t. 23, s. 9–61.
Google Scholar

Böhme H. W. (1991), Ausgewähltefunde aus dem Germanischen Königsgrab von Mušov (Südmähren/ČSFR) anlässlich der Restaurierung, „Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt”, t. 21, s. 291–302.
Google Scholar

Carnap-Bornheim C. von, Ilkjær J. (1996), Illerup Ådal. Die Prachtausrüstungen, „Jysk Arkæologisk Selskabs”, t. 25, s. 5–8.
Google Scholar

Dixon K. R., Southern P. (2012), Kawaleria rzymska od I do III wieku po Chr., Oświęcim.
Google Scholar

Droberjard E. (1999a), Dobřichov-Pičhora: Ein Brandgräberfeld der älteren römischen Kaiserzeit In Böhmen (Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Marbod-Reichs), Praha.
Google Scholar

Droberjard E. (1999b), Od plaňanských pohárů k vinařické skupině: kulturní a chronologické vztahy na území Čech v době římské a v časné době stěhování národů, „Sborník Národního muzea v Praze”, A – Historie, t. 53.
Google Scholar

Eggers H. J., Stary P. F. (2001), Funde der Vorrömischen Eisenzeit, der Römischen Kaiserzeit und der Völkerwanderungszeit in Pommern, Beiträge zur und Frühgeschichte Mecklemburg-Vorpommerns, 38, Lübstorf.
Google Scholar

Ginalski J. (1991), Ostrogi kabłąkowe kultury przeworskiej. Klasyfikacja typologiczna, „Przegląd Archeologiczny”, t. 38, s. 53–84.
Google Scholar

Godłowski K. (1970), The Chronology of the Late Roman and Early Migration Periods in Central Europe, „Prace Archeologiczne”, t. 11.
Google Scholar

Hedeager L., Kristiansen K. (1981), Bendstrup – en fyrstegrav fra den romerske jernalder, dens sociale og historiske miljø, Kuml, s. 81–149.
Google Scholar

Jahn M. (1921), Der reitersporn, Seine Entstehung Und früheste Entwicklung, „Mannus Biblothek”, t. 21, Leipzig.
Google Scholar

Jensen X. P. (2008), Våben fra Vimose: bearbejdning og tolkning af et gammelkendt fund, Københavns Universitet, Københavns.
Google Scholar

Kontny B., Okulicz-Kozaryn J., Pietrzak M. (2011), Nowinka. Site 1.The cemetery from th Late Migration Period in the northem Poland, Gdańsk–Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Kontny B., Rudnicki M. (2002), Ostrogi z Pełczysk, pow. pińczowski. Nowe oblicze stanoska z okresu lateńskiego i okresu wpływów rzymskich, „Światowit”, t. IV (XLV), Fasc. B, s.145–157.
Google Scholar

Łuczkiewicz P. (2006a), Uzbrojenie ludności ziem Polski w młodszym okresie przedrzymskim, Lublin.
Google Scholar

Łuczkiewicz P. (2006b), Elbgermanisch geprägte Funde und Befunde in Polen um die Zeitewende, [w:] Mitteleuropa zur Zeit Marbods, eds. V. Salač, J. Bemmann, Praha–Bonn, s. 341–360.
Google Scholar

Makiewicz T. (1970), Cmentarzysko z okresu rzymskiego w Białej, pow. Łódź, „Prace i Materiały Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego”, seria archeologiczna, 17, s. 175–255.
Google Scholar

Mączyńska M., Rudnicka D. (2004), Ein Grab mit römischen Importen aus Czarnówko, Kr. Lebork (Pommern), „Germania”, t. 82/2, s. 397–429.
Google Scholar

Motyková-Šniedrová K. (1965), Zur Chronologie der ältesten römischen Kaiserzeit i Böhmen, „Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühgeschichte”, t. 5., s. 103–174.
Google Scholar

Motyková-Šniedrová K. (1967), Weiterentwicklung und Ausklang der älteren römische Kaiserzeit in Böhmen, „Fontes Archaeologici Pragenses”, Praha.
Google Scholar

Müller, A. von (1957), Formenkreise der älteren römischen Kaiserzeit im Raum zwische Havelseenplatte und Ostsee, „Berliner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte”, t. 1.
Google Scholar

Olshausen O. (1890), Beitrag zur Geschichte der Reiterspornes, „Zeitschrift für Ethnologie”, t. 22, s. 184–210.
Google Scholar

Olshausen O. (1891), Radsporen auf Siegeln im Grobe Berntharts von Kalien und auf einem Relief am Dom zu Monza, „Zeitschrift für Ethnologie”, t. 23, s. 219–223.
Google Scholar

Pieta K. (1982), Die Púchov Kultur, Nitra.
Google Scholar

Pieta K. (2005), Spätlatènezeitliche Waffen und Ausrüstung im nördlichen Teil des Karpa beckens, „Slovenská Archeológia”, t. 53, s. 35–84.
Google Scholar

Roman E. (1997), Ostrogi krzesłowate z terenu ziem polskich, [w:] 20 lat archeologii w Masłomęczu, red. J. Ilkjaer, A. Kokowski, Lublin, t. 1, s. 165–188.
Google Scholar

Smółka E. (2014), The presence of spurs in the south-eastern Baltic area in the Roman Iron Age and Migration Period – some remarks, „Archaeologia Lituana”, t. 15, s. 47–64.
Google Scholar

Tejral J. (2002), Die Sporen, [w:] Das germanische Königsgrab von Mušov in Mähren, vol. 2, eds. J. Peška, J. Tejral, Mainz, s. 141–188.
Google Scholar

Zschille R., Forrer R. (1891), Der Sporn in seiner Formen-entwicklung. Ein Versuch zu Charakterisierung und Datierung der Sporen unserer Kulturvölker 1, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Zschille R., Forrer R. (1899), Der Sporn in seiner Formen-entwicklung. Ein Versuch zu Charakterisierung und Datierung der Sporen unserer Kulturvölker 2, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Vnoučková E. (2014), Ostruhy z doby římské v Čechách, Univerzita Pardubice, Pardubice.
Google Scholar

Völling T. (1992), Dreikreisplattensporen. Anmerkungen zu einem Spornfund aus Hopfestadt, Ldkr. Würzburg, „Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt”, t. 22, s. 393–402.
Google Scholar

Völling T. (2005), Germanien an der Zeitenwende. Studien zum Kulturwandel beim Übegangvon der vorrömischen Eisenzeit zurälteren römischen Kaiserzeit in der Germania Magna, BAR International Series 1360, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Wołągiewicz R. (1993), Ceramika kultury wielbarskiej między Bałtykiem a Morzem Czarnym, Szczecin.
Google Scholar

Żak J., Maćkowiak-Kotkowska L. (1988), Studia nad uzbrojeniem środkowoeuropejskim w VI–X wieku. Zachodniobałtyjskie i słowiańskie ostrogi o zaczepach haczykowatych zagiętych do wnętrza, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2017-09-27

Jak cytować

Smółka-Antkowiak, E. (2017). Ostrogi krzesłowate w okresie wpływów rzymskich – stan i potrzeby badań. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archaeologica, (31), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.31.02

Numer

Dział

Articles