Critical Dimensions of the ‘Legal Culture’ Approach: The Case of Classical Eurasianism and Eurasia’s Legal Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.89.06Keywords:
Legal Culture, Critical Legal Theory, Classical Eurasianism, Сultural Turn, Legal Union, Legal Family, MestorazvitieAbstract
This paper refers to the accurate usage of the word “Eurasian”, which is tightly connected with Russian Eurasianism, an intellectual movement that existed in the Interwar period, in the years 1921–1939. Nowadays, the concept of “Legal Culture” is rendered banal by comparative legal thinkers, who reduce it to legal tradition or even the legal system as a social system. In contrast to these theories, the Eurasianist jural project was mostly culture-oriented. For instance, the Eurasianist idea of Language Union, provided by Nikolai Trubetzkoy and the famous linguist Roman Jakobson, could be useful for developing a new concept of Legal Union instead of the idea of legal family. Piotr Savitzky’s notion of “Mestorazvitie”, Jakobson’s “method of linking”, and Nickolai Alekseev’s idea of “Right-Duty” could be very fruitful concepts for establishing cultural jurisprudence.
Downloads
References
Alekseev, Nikolai. 1930. Religiya, pravo i nravstvennost’. Parizh: YMCA Press.
Google Scholar
Alekseev, Nikolai. 1931. “K ucheniyu ob ‘obyektivnom prave’: o normativizme v prave”. In Tridtsatye gody. Utverzhdenie evraziytsev. Kn. 7. 221–254. Parizh: Evraziiskoye knigoizdatelstvo.
Google Scholar
Alekseev, Nikolai. 1998. “Obyazannost’ i pravo”. In Russkii narod i gosudarstvo. 155–169. Moskva: AGRAF.
Google Scholar
Alekseev, Nikolai. 1998. Osnovy filosofii prava. Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskiy institute.
Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bachman-Medick, Doris. 2016. Cultural Turns. New Orientations in the Study of Culture. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Böss, Ottо. 1961. Die Lehre der Eurasier. Ein Beitrag zur russischen Ideengeshichte des 20. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Google Scholar
Chestnov, Ilya. 2012. Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava. Sankt-Peterburg: Alef-Press.
Google Scholar
Comparato, Guido. 2014. “Challenging Legal Culture”. European Journal of Legal Studies 7(2): 5–17.
Google Scholar
Dunaev, Nikolai. 1931. “Pravomochie i ègo vidy”. In Tridtsatye gody. Utverzhdenie evraziytsev. Kn. 7. 255–284. Parizh: Evraziiskoye knigoizdatelstvo.
Google Scholar
Florovsky, Georges. 1975. “Western Influences in Russian Theology”. In: Aspects of Church History. Vol. IV in the Collected Works of Georges Florovsky. 157–182. Belmont, МА: Harvard University.
Google Scholar
Florovsky, Georges. 2008. “Khitrost Razuma”. In Ishod k Vostoku. 71–85. Moskva: Ladomir.
Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Giaro, Tomasz. 2011. “Legal Tradition of East Europe. Its Rise and Demise“. Comparative Law Review 2(1): 1–23.
Google Scholar
Gurian, Waldemar. 1964. “Totalitarianism as a Political Religion”. In Totalitarianism. 119–137. Edited by Carl J. Friedrich. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
Google Scholar
Hegel, George.V.F. 1978. Filosofiya dukha. Moskva: Nauka.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1987. Age of Empire, 1875–1914. New York: Vintage Books.
Google Scholar
Hoecke, Marc van. 2002. Law as Communication. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar
Homjakov, Alexei. 1926. “Pis’mo k redaktory «L’Union Chretiénne» o znachenii slov ‘kafolicheskiy’ i ‘sobornyy’ po povodu rechi ottsa Gagarina, iezuita”. In O cerkvi. 57–59. Berlin.
Google Scholar
Ilyin, Vladimir. 1925. “K vzaimootnosheniyu pravy i nravstvennosti”. Evraziysky vremennik 4: 305–317.
Google Scholar
Ilyin, Vladimir. 1928. “Magnitsky M. L. (Iz istorii evraziyskikh idey)”. Evraziyskaya Khronika 10: 86.
Google Scholar
Isaev, Igor. 1991. Politiko-pravovaya utopiya v Rossii: Konets XIX – nach. XX v. Moscow: Nauka.
Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1931. K kharakteristike evraziyskogo yazykovogo soyuza. Parizh: Imprimerie de Navarre.
Google Scholar
Karsavin, Lev. 1927. “Osnovy politiki”. Evraziysky vremennik 5: 174–239.
Google Scholar
Karsavin, Lev. 2005. “Tserkov’, lichnost’ i gosudarstvo”. Chelovek 2: 70–82.
Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. 1996. “European Legal Systems Are Not Converging”. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45(1): 52–81.
Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. 1997. “The Impossibility of Legal Transplants”. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4: 111–124.
Google Scholar
Mańko, Rafał. Martin Škop. Markéta Štěpáníková. 2018. “Carving Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?” Wroclav Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(2): 4–28.
Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2004. “Using the Concept of Legal Culture”. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29(1): 1–28.
Google Scholar
Pashukanis, Evgeni. 1980. Izbrannye trudy posle teorii prava i gosudarstva. Moskva: Nauka.
Google Scholar
Petrazhitskii, Lev. 2000. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti. Sankt-Peterburg: Lan’.
Google Scholar
Pribytkova, Elena. 2009. “V poiskakh èticheskogo minimuma: G. Ellinek, È. Fon Gartman, Vl. Solovyev”. Issledovaniya po istorii russkoy mysli. Ezhegodnik za 2006–2007 8: 307–345.
Google Scholar
Savitzky, Piotr. 1921. “Evropa i Evraziya (po povodu broshury N.S. Trubetskogo ‘Evropa i chelovechestvo’)”. Russkaya mysl’ 1–2: 119–138.
Google Scholar
Savitzky, Piotr. 1927. “Geografichesky obzor Rossii-Evrazii”. In Rossiya – otdel’ny geografichesky mir. Praga: Evraziiskoye knigoizdatelstvo.
Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich. W. J. 1987. Sochineniya v 2 toma. T. 1. Moskva: Nauka.
Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1974. Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Berlin: Dunсker & Humblot.
Google Scholar
Serio, Patrik. 2001. Ctruktura i tselostnost’: ob intellektual’nykh istokakh strukturalizma v Tsentral’noy i Vostochnoy Evrope. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul‘tury.
Google Scholar
Shakhmatov, Mstislav. 1923. “Podvig vlasti”. Evraziysky vremennik 3: 55–80.
Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 2007. Estestvennoe pravo i istoriya. Moskva: Vodolej.
Google Scholar
Suess, Edward. 1885. Das Antlitz der Erde. Bd. I. Prag–Leipzig: F. Tempsky.
Google Scholar
Toman, Jindřich. 1995. The Magic of a Common Language: Jakobson, Mathesius, Trubetzkoy, and the Prague Linguistic Circle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1930. “Proposition 16. Über den Sprachbund“. In Actes du premier congrès international des linguistes à la Haye, du 10–15 avril 1928. 17–18. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.
Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1991. The Legacy of Genghis Khan and Other Essays on Russia’s Identity. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 2000. Nasledie Chengiskhana. Moskva: AGRAF.
Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 2008. Pis’ma k P.P.Suvchinskomu: 1921–1928. Moskva: Russkii Put’.
Google Scholar
Zhivov, Victor. 1988. “Istoriya prava kak lingvosemioticheskaya problema”. In Semiotics and the History of Culture: In Honor of Jurij Lotman. 46–128. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.
Google Scholar
State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF): Arapov 1925a (F. R 5783. Op. 1. D. 193. Zametki Arapova ’o natsionalizme’ [Arapov’s notes ‘on Nationalism’]. 17 Sentyabria 1925).
Google Scholar
State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF): Arapov 1925b (F. R 5783. Op. 1. D. 193. Zametki Arapova ’o natsionalizme’ [Arapov’s notes ‘on Nationalism’]. 5 Oktyabria 1925).
Google Scholar
State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF): Pis’ma Savitzkomu 1925 (F. R. 5783. Op. 1. D. 410. Pis’ma P.N. Savitskomu ot predstaviteley evraziyskogo techeniya po vnutri-partiynym i literaturno-izdatel’skim voprosom [Letters to P.N. Savitzky from representatives of Eurasian movement on internal-party and literature-publishing issues]. 4 Oktyabria 1925).
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.