Arboreal Tradition and Subversion: An Ecocritical Reading of Shakespeare’s Portrayal of Trees, Woods and Forests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.21.06Słowa kluczowe:
Shakespeare, trees, woods, forests, ecocriticism, tradition, subversionAbstrakt
This paper analyses from an ecocritical standpoint the role of trees, woods and forests and their symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Macbeth, The Merchant of Venice, The Merry Wives of Windsor, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Richard II and The Tempest. The analysis begins with an outline of the representation of trees on stage to continue with a ‘close reading’ of the mentioned plays, clearly distinguishing individual trees from woods and forests. Individual types of trees may represent death, sadness, sorcery and premonitions, or serve as meeting places, while forests and woods are frequently portrayed as settings which create an atmosphere of confusion, false appearances, danger and magic. This reflects a long-standing historical connection between trees and forests and the supernatural in literature and culture. However, while individual trees largely reflect traditional symbology, conventional interpretations are often subverted in Shakespeare’s treatment of forests and woods. From all this we may infer that Shakespeare was not only familiar with the traditions associated to individual tree species and forests in general, but also that he made conscious and active use of these in order to enhance the meaning of an action, reinforce character traits, further the plot and create a specific atmosphere. More subtly, the collective arboreal environments can also be interpreted as spaces in which superstitions and older societal models are questioned in favour of a more rational and reasonable understanding of the world.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Barton, Anne. The Shakespearean Forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139015257
Barton, Anne. “The Wild Man in the Forest.” Comparative Criticism. Spaces: Cities, Gardens and Wildernesses. Ed. E. S. Shaffer. Vol. 18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 21-54.
Google Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno. The Uses of Enchantment. London: Penguin, 1991.
Google Scholar
The Bible. Authorized King James Version. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems. Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
Google Scholar
Cossio, Andoni. “Tree and Forest Models in Victorian/Edwardian Fantasy: MacDonald, Morris and Grahame as Triggers of J. R. R. Tolkien’s Creativity.” Intelligence, Creativity and Fantasy. Eds. Mario S. Ming Kong et al. London: CRC Press, 2019. 411-417.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429297755-69
Egan, Gabriel. Green Shakespeare: From Ecopolitics to Ecocriticism. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300770
Egan, Gabriel. Shakespeare. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
Google Scholar
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806838
Gersdorf, Catrin and Sylvia Mayer. “Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies: Defining the Subject of Ecocriticism—An Introduction.” Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies: Transatlantic Conversations on Ecocriticism. Eds. Catrin Gersdorf and Sylvia Mayer. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006. 9-21.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203555_002
Harrison, Robert. Forests: The Shadow of Civilization. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Google Scholar
Hayman, Richard. Trees, Woodlands and Western Civilization. London: Hambledon & London, 2003.
Google Scholar
Henslowe, Philip. The Diary of Philip Henslowe, from 1591 to 1609. Ed. J. P. Collier. London: Printed for the Shakespeare Society, 1845.
Google Scholar
Hooke, Della. Trees in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
Kendall, Paul. “Willow.” Trees for Life. 2020. Accessed 21 May 2020. https://treesforlife.org.uk/into-the-forest/trees-plants-animals/trees/willow/willow-mythology-and-folklore/
Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas W. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77h3r
Leland, John and Alan Baragona. Shakespeare’s Prop Room: An Inventory. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2016.
Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie and Emma Smith. 30 Great Myths about Shakespeare. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326770
Morton, Timothy. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
Google Scholar
Nail, Sylvie. Forest Policies and Social Change in England. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.112024
National Trust. “Ankerwycke.” National Trust. Accessed 21 May 2020. https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/runnymede/features/ankerwycke
Google Scholar
Orange, James. History and Antiquities of Nottingham. Vol. 1. London: Hamilton, Adams and Co., 1840.
Google Scholar
Reynolds, George F. “‘Trees’ on the Stage of Shakespeare.” Modern Philology 5.2 (1907): 153-168. JSTOR. Accessed 21 May 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/432486
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/386737
Shakespeare, William. The Comical History of the Merchant of Venice, or Otherwise Called the Jew of Venice. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 454-479.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00012536
Shakespeare, William. The Merry Wives of Windsor. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 512-536.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 402-423.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 1221-1244.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 682-718.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of King Richard the Second. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 340-367.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Macbeth. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells et al. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. 970-993.
Google Scholar
Shapiro, James. 1606: Shakespeare and the Year of Lear. Paperback ed. London: Faber & Faber, 2016.
Google Scholar
Simonson, Martin. “The Arboreal Foundations of Stewardship in J. R. R. Tolkien’s Silmarillion.” English Studies in Africa. 60.2 (2017): 12-22. Accessed 21 May 2020. doi: 10.1080/00138398.2017.1406735.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2017.1406735
Slovic, Scott. “Ecocriticism: Containing Multitudes, Practicing Doctrine.” The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. Ed. Laurence Coupe. London, New York, NY: Routledge, 2000. 160-162.
Google Scholar
Thomas, Vivian. “Plants.” The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Eds. Michael Dobson et al. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 116. Accessed 21 May 2020. doi:10.1093/acref/9780198708735.001.0001.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780198708735.001.0001
Wells, Robin Headlam. Shakespeare’s Politics: A Contextual Introduction. London, New York, NY: Continuum, 2009.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555427
Woodland Trust. “Willow, Crack (Salix Fragilis).” Woodland Trust. Accessed 21 May 2020. https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/trees-woods-and-wildlife/british-trees/a-z-of-british-trees/crack-willow/
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.