Berichus and the Evidence for Aspar’s Political Power and Aims in the Last Years of Theodosius II’s Reign

Łukasz Pigoński

doi:10.18778/2084-140X.08.13

Authors

Łukasz Pigoński Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Instytut Historii, Katedra Historii Bizancjum, ul. Kamińskiego 27a, 90-219 Łódź, Polska/Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.08.13

Keywords:

Byzantium, Huns, Aspar, Theodosius II, Byzantine foreign policy, Byzantine military elite

Abstract

The article examines Priscus’s account of the conflict that emerged between the leader of the Roman embassy, Maximinus, and the Hunnic envoy, Berichus. The barbarian got offended by the remarks concerning the lack of competence and influence of Aspar and Areobindus. A detailed analysis of this short passage – entailing the persona of Berichus himself, the reasons for his anger, and the possible explanations for Maximinus’s behaviour – can provide us with evidence regarding the political position of Aspar in the last years of the reign of Theodosius II. Most scholars use this example to illustrate Aspar’s falling out of favour and power; it is more likely, however, that the situation was actually more complex. The political struggle between Chrysaphius, a proponent of the policy of reconciliation with the Huns, and Zeno, the opponent of such policies, makes it far more probable that the government feared that their diplomatic effort might be hijacked by the opposing faction. Therefore, it was political differences – and not the failures in the war of 447 – that were the reason for Aspar’s falling out with the emperor. This would also mean that Zeno and Aspar shared similar views on how to solve the Hunnic problem, which would be the basis for their cooperation, resulting in the overthrowing of Chrysaphius and the crowning of Marcian in 450.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chronica Gallica a. CCCCLII, [in:] Chronica Gallica, ed. T. Mommsen, Berolini 1892, p. 646–662 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Auctores antiquissimi].
Google Scholar

The Chronicle of Marcellinus, ed. et trans. B. Croke, Sydney 1995 [= Byzantina Australiensia, 7].
Google Scholar

Chronicon Paschale, vol. I–II, ed. L. Dindorfius, Bonnae 1832 [= Corpus scriptorum historiae byzantinae, 14–15].
Google Scholar

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus, ed. et. trans. M. Whitby, Liverpool 2000 [= Translated Texts for Historians, 33].
Google Scholar

Ioannis Malalae Chronographia, rec. I. Thurn, Beriolini–Novi Eboraci 2000 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae. Series Berolinensis, 35].
Google Scholar

Iordanes, Romana, [in:] Iordanis Romana et Getica, rec. T. Mommsen, Berolini 1882, p. 1–52 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Auctores antiquissimi].
Google Scholar

Priscus, Fragmenta, [in:] The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire. Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, ed. et trans. R.C. Blockley, vol. II, Liverpool 1983, p. 221–401.
Google Scholar

Procopius, History of the Wars, vol. II, Books 3–4. (Vandalic War), trans. H.B. Dewing, Cambridge Massachusetts 1916 [= Loeb Classical Library, 81].
Google Scholar

Theophanis Chronographia, vol. I–II, rec. C. de Boor, Lipsiae 1883–1885.
Google Scholar

Altheim F., Geschichte der Hunnen, vol. IV, 2Berlin 1975.
Google Scholar

Bachrach B., A History of the Alans in the West. From Their First Appearance in the Sources of Classical Antiquity through the Early Middle Ages, Minneapolis 1973.
Google Scholar

Bleeker R.A., Aspar and Attila: The Role of Flavius Ardaburius Aspar in the Hun Wars of the 440s, “Ancient World” 3, 1980, p. 23–28.
Google Scholar

Blockley R.C., East Roman Foreign Policy. Formation and Conduct from Diocletian to Anastasius, Leeds 1992.
Google Scholar

Bóna I., Das Hunnenreich, Stuttgart 1991.
Google Scholar

Burgess R.W., The Accession of Marcian in the Light of Chalcedonian Apologetic and Monophysite Polemic, “Byzantinische Zeitschrift” 86/87, 1994, p. 27–68.
Google Scholar

Burns T.S., A History of the Ostrogoths, Bloomington 1984.
Google Scholar

Bury J.B., History of the Later Roman Empire from the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian, AD 395 to AD 565, London 1923.
Google Scholar

Croke B., Anatolius and Nomus: Envoys to Attila, “Byzantinoslavica” 42, 1981, p. 159–170.
Google Scholar

Croke B., Dynasty and Ethnicity. Emperor Leo I and the Eclipse of Aspar, “Chiron” 35, 2005, p. 147–203.
Google Scholar

Demandt A., Geschichte der Spätantike, 2München 2008 [= Alte Geschichte in Beck’s historischer Bibliothek].
Google Scholar

Feld K., Barbarische Bürger. Die Isaurier und das Römische Reich, Berlin 2005.
Google Scholar

Gautier E., Genséric. Roi de Carthage, Paris 1951.
Google Scholar

Glušanin E.P., Voennaja znat’ rannej Vizantii, Varnaul 1991.
Google Scholar

Gordon C.D., The Age of Attila. Fifth-Century Byzantium and the Barbarians, Michigan 1961.
Google Scholar

Heather P., Goths and Romans 332–489, Oxford 1991 [= Oxford Historical Monographs].
Google Scholar

Hohlfelder R.L., Marcian’s Gamble. A Reassessment of Eastern Imperial Policy toward Attila AD 450–453, “American Journal of Ancient History” 9, 1984, p. 54–69.
Google Scholar

Holum K.G., Theodosian Empresses. Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity, Berkeley–London 1981.
Google Scholar

Jones A.H.M., The Later Roman Empire 284–602. A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey, Oxford 1964.
Google Scholar

Karayannopulos J., Byzantinische Miszellen, [in:] Studia in honorem Veselini Beševliev, ed. V. Georgiev, Sofia 1978.
Google Scholar

Kelly C., Neither Conquest nor Settlement: Attila’s Empire and Its Impact, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, ed. M. Maas, Cambridge 2015 [= Cambridge Companions to the Ancient World], p. 193–208.
Google Scholar

Kim H.J., The Huns, Romans and the Birth of Europe, Cambridge 2013.
Google Scholar

Kosiński R., The Emperor Zeno. Religion and Politics, trans. M. Fijak, Cracow 2010 [= Byzantina et Slavica Cracoviensia, 6].
Google Scholar

Laniado A., Aspar and His Phoideratoi: John Malalas on a Special Relationship, [in:] Governare e riformare l’impero al momento della sua divisione. Oriente, Occidente, Illirico, ed. U. Roberto, L. Mecella, Rome 2016, p. 325–344 [= Collection de l’École française de Rome, 507].
Google Scholar

Lee A.D., The Eastern Empire: Theodosius to Anastasius, [in:] Cambridge Ancient History, vol. XIV, ed. A. Cameron, B. Ward-Perkins, M. Whitby, Cambridge 2008, p. 33–62.
Google Scholar

Lee A.D., Theodosius and His Generals [in:] Theodosius II. Rethinking the Roman Empire in Late Antiquity, ed. C. Kelly, Cambridge–New York 2013 [= Cambridge Classical Studies], p. 90–108.
Google Scholar

Lensky N., Captivity among the Barbarians and Its Impact on the Fate of the Roman Empire, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, ed. M. Maas, Cambridge 2015, p. 230–246.
Google Scholar

Maenchen-Helfen O., The World of Huns. Studies in Their History and Culture, ed. M. Knight, Berkeley–London 1973.
Google Scholar

McEvoy M., Becoming Roman? The Not-So-Curious Case of Aspar and the Ardaburii, “Journal of Late Antiquity” 9, 2016, p. 483–511.
Google Scholar

Prostko-Prostyński J., Attila and Novae, [in:] Novae. Legionary Fortress and Late Antique Town, vol. I, A Companion to the Study of Novae, ed. T. Derda, P. Dyczek, J. Kolendo, Warsaw 2008, p. 133–140.
Google Scholar

Rouche M., Attila. La violence nomade, Paris 2009.
Google Scholar

Scott L., Aspar and the Burden of Barbarian Heritage, “Byzantine Studies / Études byzantines” 3, 1976, p. 59–69.
Google Scholar

Stein E., Histoire du Bas-Empire, Paris 1959.
Google Scholar

Stickler T., Aëtius. Gestaltungsspielräume eines Heermeisters im ausgehenden Weströmischen Reich, München 2002.
Google Scholar

Stickler T., Die Hunnen, München 2007.
Google Scholar

Thompson E.A., The Foreign Policies of Theodosius II and Marcian, “Hermathena” 76, 1950, p. 58–75.
Google Scholar

Thompson E.A., A History of Attila and the Huns, Oxford 1948.
Google Scholar

Thompson E.A., The Isaurians under Theodosius II, “Hermathena” 48, 1946, p. 18–31.
Google Scholar

Tyszkiewicz L., Hunowie w Europie. Ich wpływ na Cesarstwo Wschodnie i Zachodnie oraz na ludy barbarzyńskie, Wrocław 2004 [= Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, 2695].
Google Scholar

Urbaniec A., Wpływ patrycjusza Aspara na cesarską elekcję Leona, “U Schyłku Starożytności. Studia Źródłoznawcze” 11, 2011, p. 173–201.
Google Scholar

Vernadsky G., Flavius Ardabur Aspar, “Sudost-Forschungen” 6, 1941, p. 38–72.
Google Scholar

Vössing K., Das Königreich der Vandalen. Geiserichs Herrschaft und das Imperium Romanum, Darmstadt 2014.
Google Scholar

Wilczyński M., Gejzeryk i “czwarta wojna punicka”, Oświęcim 2016.
Google Scholar

Wirth G., Attila. Das Hunnenreich und Europa, Stuttgart 1999.
Google Scholar

Zuckermann C., L’Empire d’Orient et les Huns. Notes sur Priscus, “Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines” 12, 1994, p. 159–182.
Google Scholar