On the Possibilities of Researching the Marriage Policies of the Rurikids: The Case of Mstislav Fyodor Vladimirovich Monomakhovich

Autor

  • Dariusz Dąbrowski Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy, Wydział Humanistyczny, Instytut Historii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych, ul. Księcia Józefa Poniatowskiego 12, 85-671 Bydgoszcz, Polska/Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.08.05

Słowa kluczowe:

genealogy, matrimonial policy, Rurikids, medieval Rus’, Mstislav Fedor Vladimirovich and his family

Abstrakt

The main goal of the article is to present the possibilities and methods of research on the Rurikid’s matrimonial policy in the Middle Ages on the example of a selected group of princes. As the subject of studies were chosen Mstislav Vladimirovich and his children. In total, 12 matrimonial relationships were included. The analysis of the source material revealed very unfavorable phenomena from the perspective of the topic under study. The Rus’ primary sources gave information on the conclusion of just four marriages out of twelve. The next four matrimonial arrangement inform foreign sources (Scandinavian and Norman). It should be emphasized particularly strongly that – save for two exceptions of Scandinavian provenance – the sources convey no information whatsoever as regards the political aims behind this or that marriage agreement. It appears, then, that the chroniclers of the period and cultural sphere in question did not regard details concerning marriages (such as their circumstances or the reasons behind them) as “information notable enough to be worth preserving”. Truth be told, even the very fact of the marriage did not always belong to this category. Due to the state of preservation of primary sources the basic question arises as to whether it is possible to study the Rurikids’ matrimonial policy? In spite of the mercilessly sparse source material, it is by all means possible to conduct feasible research on the Rurikids’ marriage policy. One must know how to do it right, however. Thus, such studies must on the one hand be rooted in a deep knowledge of the relevant sources (not only of Rus’ provenance) as well as the ability to subject them to astute analysis; on the other hand, they must adhere to the specially developed methodology, presented in the first part of the article.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Ágrip af sögu Danakonunga, [in:] Danakonunga sögur. Skjöldunga saga; Knýtlinga saga; Ágrip af sögu Danakonunga, ed. B. Gudnason, Reykjavík 1982 [=Íslenzk fornrit, 35].
Google Scholar

Džakson T.N., Islandskie korolevskie sagi o Vostočnoj Evrope (seredina XI – seredina XIII v.). Teksty, perevod, kommentarij, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Fagrskinna, [in:] Ágrip af Nóregskonunga so̜gum; Fagrskinna – Nóregs konunga tal, ed. B. Einarsson, Reykjavík 1985 [=Íslenzk fornrit, 29].
Google Scholar

Fagrskinna, a Catalogue of the Kings of Norway, trans. et ed. A. Finlay, Leiden–Boston 2004.
Google Scholar

Gustynskayja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. XL, Sankt-Peterburg 2003.
Google Scholar

Historia Sancti Canuti Ducis et Martyris, auctore Anonymo, [in:] Scriptores Rerum Danicarum Medii Aevii, vol. IV, ed. J. Langebek, Hafniae 1776, p. 230–256.
Google Scholar

The Hustynja Chronicle, coll. O. Tolochko, Cambridge Massachusett 2013 [= Harvard Library of Early Ukrainian Literature. Texts, 11].
Google Scholar

The Hypatian Codex, pars 2, The Galician-Volynian Chronicle, trans. G.A. Perfecky, München 1973 [= Harvard Series in Ukrainian Studies, 16.2].
Google Scholar

Ipat’evskaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. II, Moskva 1998.
Google Scholar

The Kievan Chronicle, trans. L. Heinrich (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1977).
Google Scholar

Kievskaja letopis’, ed. I.S. Jur’eva, Moskva 2017.
Google Scholar

Knýtlinga saga, [in:] Danakonunga sögur. Skjöldunga saga; Knýtlinga saga; Ágrip af sögu Danakonunga, ed. B. Guðnason, Reykjavík 1982 [= Íslenzk fornrit, 35].
Google Scholar

Kronika halicko-wołyńska. (Kronika Romanowiczow), rec. D. Dąbrowski, A. Jusupović et al., [in:] Monumenta Poloniae Historica. Series Nova, vol. XVI, Kraków–Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar

Latopis hustyński, trans. et ed. H. Suszko, Wrocław 2003 [= Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Slavica Wratislaviensia, 124].
Google Scholar

Latopis kijowski 1118–1158, trans. et ed. E. Goranin, Wrocław 1995 [= Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Slavica Wratislaviensia, 86].
Google Scholar

Latopis kijowski 1159–1198, trans. et ed. E. Goranin, Wrocław 1988 [= Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Slavica Wratislaviensia, 40].
Google Scholar

Latopis Nestora, trans. et ed. A. Bielowski, J. Wagilewicz, [in:] Monumenta Poloniae Historica, vol. I, Lwów 1864 [repr. Warszawa 1960], p. 521–862.
Google Scholar

Lavrent’evskaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. I, Moskva 2001.
Google Scholar

Letopis’ po Voskresenskomu spisku, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. VII, Moskva 2001.
Google Scholar

Moskovskij letopisnyj svod konca XV veka, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. XXV, Moskva 2004.
Google Scholar

Novgorodskaja četvertaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. IV, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Novgorodskaja pervaja letopis’ staršego i mladšego izvodov, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. III, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Orderici Vitalis Angligenae coenobii uticensis monachi Historia Ecclesiastica, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. CLXXXVIII, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1855, col. 17–984.
Google Scholar

Powieść minionych lat. Charakterystyka historycznoliteracka, trans. F. Sielicki, ed. M. Jakóbiec, W. Jakubowski, Wrocław 1968 (2nd ed.: Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków 1999).
Google Scholar

Radzivilovskaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. XXXVIII, Leningrad 1989.
Google Scholar

The Russian Primary Chronicle. Laurentian Text, trans. et ed. S. Hazzard Cross, O.P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor, Cambridge Massachusett 1953.
Google Scholar

Saxonis Gesta Danorum, vol. I, rec. J. Olrik, H. Ræder, Hauniae 1931.
Google Scholar

Snorri Sturluson, Heimskringla, vol. III, ed. B. Adalbjarnarson, Reykjavík 1979 [= Íslenzk fornrit, 28].
Google Scholar

Sofijskaja pervaja letopis’ staršego izvoda, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. VI.1, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Tipografskaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. XXIV, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Tverskaja letopis’, [in:] Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej, vol. XV, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Aleškovskij M.Ch., Povest’ vremennych let. Iz istorii sozdanija i redakcionnoj pererabotki, ed. F.B. Uspenskij, Moskva 2015.
Google Scholar

Dąbrowski D., Daniel Romanowicz krol Rusi (ok. 1201–1264). Biografia polityczna, Kraków 2012 [= Monografie. Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego. Pracownia Badań nad Dziejami Rusi, 1].
Google Scholar

Dąbrowski D., Genealogia Mścisławowiczów. Pierwsze pokolenia (do początku XIV wieku), Kraków 2008.
Google Scholar

Dąbrowski D., Król Rusi Daniel Romanowicz. O ruskiej rodzinie książęcej, społeczeństwie i kulturze w XIII w., Kraków 2016 [= Monografie. Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego. Pracownia Badań nad Dziejami Rusi, 4].
Google Scholar

Dąbrowski D., Piasten und Rurikiden im 11. bis zur Mitte des 13. Jahrhunderts, [in:] Fernhändler, Dynasten, Kleriker. Die piastische Herrschaft in kontinentalen Beziehungsgeflechten vom 10. bis zum frühen 13. Jahrhundert, ed. D. Adamczyk, N. Kersken, Wiesbaden 2015, p. 155–189.
Google Scholar

Dombrovskij D., Genealogija Mstislavičej. Pervye pokolenija (do načala XIV v.), trans. et ed. K. Erusalimskij, O. Ostalčuk, Sankt-Peterburg 2015 [= Studiorum Slavicorum Orbis, 10].
Google Scholar

Frančuk V.Ju., Kievskaja letopis’. Sostav i istočniki v lingvističeskom osveščenii, Kiev 1986.
Google Scholar

Golubovskij P.V., Istorija Smolenskoj zemli do načala XV st., Kiev 1895.
Google Scholar

Grabowski J., Dynastia Piastów mazowieckiech, 2Warszawa–Kraków 2016.
Google Scholar

Janson H., The Dukedom of Braunschweig-Luneburg and the Dating of Fagrskinna, [in:] Drevnejšie gosudarstva Vostočnoj Evropy. Materialy i issledovanija 2016 god, Moskva 2018, p. 97–110.
Google Scholar

Litvina A.F., Uspenskij F.B., Vybor imeni u russkich knjazej v X–XVI vv. Dinastičeskaja istorija skvoz’ prizmu antroponimiki, Moskva 2006.
Google Scholar

Schmidt U., Ordericus Vitalis, [in:] Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, vol. VI, ed. F.W. Bautz, Hamm 1993, col. 1230–1231.
Google Scholar

Tatiščev V.N., Istorija rossijskaja, pars 2, [in:] idem, Sobranie sočinenij, vol. II–III, Moskva 1995.
Google Scholar

Tatiščev V.N., Istorija rossijskaja, pars 2, [in:] idem, Sobranie sočinenij, vol. IV, Moskva 1995.
Google Scholar

Veldtrup D., Zwischen Eherecht und Familienpolitik. Studien zu den dynastischen Heiratsprojekten Karls IV, Warendorf 1988.
Google Scholar

Weller T., Die Heiratspolitik des deutschen Hochadels im 12. Jahrhundert, Köln 2004.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2018-12-30

Jak cytować

Dąbrowski, D. (2018). On the Possibilities of Researching the Marriage Policies of the Rurikids: The Case of Mstislav Fyodor Vladimirovich Monomakhovich. Studia Ceranea, 8, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.08.05

Numer

Dział

Articles

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.