The Church Slavonic Biblical ‘Thematic Clues’ in the Context of European Rhetoric and Literary Traditions (Remarks for a Chapter in Historical Poetics)

Authors

  • Cristiano Diddi Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici Università di Salerno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.01

Abstract

The article deals with the case of the so-called “biblical thematic clue” (a definition introduced by R. Picchio), that is a rhetorical device allegedly widely spread in the medieval Church Slavonic literary code. Despite a large number of studies, appeared in the last decades and mostly inspired by Picchio’s theory, scholars have failed so far to produce a wide theoretical outline of this issue, moreover checking it on the basis of a narrow circle of texts (mostly in the field of hagiography and homiletics). Consequently, several methodological questions remain to a large extent unexplored. For instance: What actually is a ‘thematic clue’ and at which point of the expositio a biblical reference is expected to be found in order to be considered as a ‘thematic clue’? What degree of adherence to a previous model a ‘thematic clue’ must have in order to be recognized as such? To what extent was a medieval man of letters aware in using this rhetorical device? And apart from this, shall the ‘thematic clue’ always be interpreted as a case of ‘intertextuality’, i.e. as result of an intentional quotation of a well-defined literary model, or may it sometimes be explained also as a phenomenon of ‘interdiscoursiveness’, i.e. a unintentional quotation drawn not from a definite biblical or patristic model (‘parole’), yet from a biblical-liturgical ‘langue’?) Besides these and other issues, still open remains the question whether it is acceptable to consider the ‘thematic clue’ as an exclusive feature of the Old Church Slavonic literature, or rather a rhetorical device known even to other traditions? In this regard, the author offers a brief survey illustrating how different literary systems, over more than two thousand years, have made use of quotations from authoritative models in the introductory lines of a text or even in incipit. Examples of such a rhetorical strategy are pointed out in ancient Greek and Latin poetry, where is to be found the typical use of the so-called ‘motto’, i.e. an allusive quotation from a well-known model (primarily Homer) in the first verse of a poem, functioning as ‘self-inscription’ by the poet in a literary canon (see e.g. Callimacus, Horace, Catullus quoting Homer or Alcaeus, etc.). In more recent times, the ancient use of ‘motto’ gains strenght inside all Christian traditions, where the main source for quotations becomes the Holy Bible: for example, in Middle Latin liturgical poetry (see e.g. Paulinus of Nola, Notker Balbulus), in the Goliardic poetry (see the Archpoet of Cologne, etc.), as well as in Slavic and Byzantine hymnography. An interesting typological parallel to the Slavonic ‘thematic clues’ is to be found in Western paraliturgical practice of the so-called ‘thematic verse’, customarily in use in medieval Franciscan and Dominican homiletics. Typologically and functionally related to the ancient ‘motto’ and to medieval Greek/Latin/Slavonic ‘thematic clues’ are also several quotations from (biblical) authoritative texts in vernacular literary traditions: besides the Divine Comedy, that begins with the first verse of the Hezekiah’s Song of Thanksgiving (a text well-known to every reader in the Middle Ages, thanks to its inclusion in the Liturgy of the Hours), significant parallels can be cited from Old German and Provencal vernacular poetry (e.g. Marcabru, Jaufre Rudel, Raimbaut d’Aurenga, etc.). Quotations of authoritative models in incipit are also common, for instance, in the late medieval and renaissaince music, especially in the sacred vocal polyphony, where in the overture and, subsequently, in each section composing the mass (Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei) it is customary to quote a passage from a previous model in order to draw the attention of churchgoers, stressing a specific liturgical and/or theological meaning. The few examples discussed in the article clearly show that the so-called ‘thematic clues’ in Church Slavonic literary tradition must be considered as a local variant of a widespread rhetorical strategy, going back to Antiquity and then independently developed in several forms. The further task of the studies should be to distinguish functions, application modes and ways of reception of this rhetorical device over more than two thousand years, and to deal with this topic within a perspective of historical poetics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Stanojević St., D. Glumac, Sveto pismo u našim starim spomenicima, Beograd 1932.
Google Scholar

Dunkov D., Die Bibelzitate in der altbulgarischen Literatur, „Die Slawischen Sprachen” 43, 1995, p. 1–390.
Google Scholar

Thomson F.J., Quotations of Patristic and Byzantine Works by Early Russian Authors as an Indication of the Cultural Level of Kievan Russia, „Slavica Gandensia” 10, 1983, p. 65–102.
Google Scholar

Thomson F.J., Towards a Typology of Quotations in Early Slavonic Literature, with an Assessment of their Value for Textology Illustrated by Quotations from Ephraem Syrus’ Paraeneses in the Patericon Kievocryptense, „Anzeiger für slavische Philologie” 20, 1990, p. 15–61.
Google Scholar

Жолобов O.Ф., Поучения Ефрема Сирина в интертекстуальных и композиционных отзвуках оригинальной древнерусской письменности, „Вестник Православного Свято-Tихоновского гуманитарного университета, III, Филология”, 2007, fasc. 3 (9), p. 7–13.
Google Scholar

Picchio R., The Function of Biblical Thematic Clues in the Literary Code of “Slavia Orthodoxa”, „Slavica Hierosolymitana” 1, 1977, p. 1–31.
Google Scholar

Велковска E., Бележки върху библейските цитати в похвалното слово от Климент Охридски, „Старобългарска литература” 12, 1982, p. 64–69.
Google Scholar

Кабакчиев К., Библейската алюзия – важен фактор при интерпретиране на старобългарската литература (върху материал от “Житие на Стерфан Дечански) от Григорий Цамблак), [in:] „Търновска книжовна школа”, vol. IV, Велико Търново 1985, p. 198–203.
Google Scholar

Библейские цитаты в церковнославянской литературе – Biblical Quotations in Slavonic Literature, „Славяноведение” 2, 2003, p. 23–78.
Google Scholar

Marti R., Handschrift Text – Textgruppe – Literatur. Untersuchungen zur inneren Gliederung der frühen Literatur aus dem ostslavischen Sprachbereich in den Handschriften des 11. bis 14. Jahrhunderts, Berlin 1989.
Google Scholar

Пиккио Р., “Слово о полку Игореве” как памятник религиозной литературы Древней Руси, „Труды Отдела древнерусской литературы Института русской литературы Академии наук СССР” 50, 1997, p. 430–443.
Google Scholar

Compagnon A., La seconde main ou le travail de la citation, Paris 1979, p. 218–221.
Google Scholar

Segre C., Intertestualita e interdiscorsivita nel romanzo e nella poesia, [in:] C. Segre, Teatro e romanzo. Due tipi di comunicazione letteraria, Torino 1984, p. 103–118.
Google Scholar

Pigman G.W., Neo-Latin Imitation of the Latin Classics, [in:] Latin Poetry and Classical Tradition. Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature, ed. P. Godman, O. Murray, Oxford 1990, p. 199–210.
Google Scholar

Романчук Р., Автор или читатель? Библейская цитата и библиографическая ссылка в текстах Древней Руси (XI и XV веков), „Славяноведение” 2, 2003, p. 33–41.
Google Scholar

Norden E., Die römische Literatur, [in:] Einleitung in die Altertumswissenschaften, vol. I, Leipzig–Berlin 1909, p. 504.
Google Scholar

Pasquali G., Arte allusiva [1942], [in:] G. Pasquali, Pagine stravaganti, vol. II, Firenze 1968, p. 275–282.
Google Scholar

Genette G., Seuils, Paris 1987.
Google Scholar

Williams G., Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry, Oxford 1968.
Google Scholar

Garner R., From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry, London–New York 1990.
Google Scholar

Conte G.B., Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario. Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano, Torino 1985.
Google Scholar

Cavarzere A., Sul limitare. Il “motto” e la poesia di Orazio, Padova 1996.
Google Scholar

Ziegler K., Plagiat, [in:] Paulys Real-Encyclopadie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, ed. G. Wissowa, W. Kroll, Stuttgart 1894–1978, vol. XX.2, Stuttgart 1950, col. 1956–1997.
Google Scholar

Norberg D., L’oeuvre poetique de Paulin d’Aquilee, Stockholm 1979, p. 126–130.
Google Scholar

Godman P., Poetry of the Carolingian Renaissance, London 1985.
Google Scholar

Carmina Burana, ed. A. Hilka, O. Schumann, B. Bischoff, vol. I–III, Heidelberg 1930–1970.
Google Scholar

Di Scipio G., The Presence of Pauline Thought in the Works of Dante, Lewinston Queenston–Lampeter 1995.
Google Scholar

Wilson R., Prophecies and Prophecy in Dante’s “Commedia”, Florence 2007.
Google Scholar

Antiqui libri rituales Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae (Romani Ordines I–XV), PL, vol. XXVIII, Parisiis 1895.
Google Scholar

Ledda G., Modelli biblici e profetismo nelle Epistole di Dante, [in:] Sotto il cielo della Scrittura. Bibbia, retorica e letteratura religiosa (secc. XIII–XVI), ed. C. Delcorno, G. Baffetti, Firenze 2009, p. 57–78.
Google Scholar

Quant vient en mai, que l’on dit as lons jors. Altfranzosische Romanzen und Pastorellen, ed. K. Bartsch, Lipsiae 1870.
Google Scholar

Zumthor P., Langue et techniques poétiques à l’époque romane (XIe–XIIIe siècles), Paris 1963, p. 209.
Google Scholar

Di Girolamo C., I trovatori, Torino 1989.
Google Scholar

Meneghetti M.L., Il pubblico dei trovatori. La ricezione della poesia cortese fino al XIV secolo, Torino 1992.
Google Scholar

Roncaglia A., Carestia, „Cultura Neolatina” 18, 1958, p. 121–137.
Google Scholar

Kohler E., Observations historiques et sociologiques sur la poesie des troubadours, „Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, Xe–XIIe siècles” 7, 1964, p. 27–51.
Google Scholar

DelCorno C., ‘Antico’ e ‘moderno’ nel sermone medievale, [in:] C. DelCorno, “Quasi quidam cantus”. Studi sulla predicazione medievale, ed. G. Baffetti et al., Firenze 2009, p. 105–121.
Google Scholar

Bukofzer M., Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Music, New York 1950.
Google Scholar

New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, London 2001.
Google Scholar

Reese G., Music in the Renaissance, New York 1959.
Google Scholar

Wright C., Dufay at Cambrai: Discoveries and Revisions, „Journal of the American Musicological Society” 28, 1975, p. 175–229, p. 207.
Google Scholar

Reynolds A., Papal Patronage and the Music of St. Peter 1380–1513, Berkeley 1996.
Google Scholar

Lockwood L., Aspects of the “L’homme arme” Tradition, „Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association” 100, 1973/1974, p. 97–122.
Google Scholar

Caraci M., Fortuna del tenor “L’homme arme” nel primo Rinascimento, „Nuova Rivista Musicale Italiana” 9, 1975, fasc. 2, p. 3–36.
Google Scholar

Haass W., Studien zu den ‘L’homme arme-Messen’ des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts, Regensburg 1984.
Google Scholar

Zumthor P., La masque et la lumiere. La poetique des grandes rhetoriqueurs, Paris 1978.
Google Scholar

Schmidt V.P.G., The Quotation in Goliardic Poetry: The Feast of Fools and the Goliardic Strophe cum auctoritate, [in:] Latin Poetry and Classical Tradition. Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature, ed. P. Godman, O. Murray, Oxford 1990, p. 39–55.
Google Scholar

Szoverffy J., Ein Schmuckmittel der mittellateinischen Strophen: Regelmassige Zeilenentlehnung in der Hymnendichtung, „Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch” 7, 1972, p. 7–40.
Google Scholar

Vickers B., Figures of rhetoric / Figures of music?, „Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric” 2, 1984, p. 1–44.
Google Scholar

Reckow F., Zwischen Ontologie und Rhetorik: die Idee des movere animos und der Übergang vom Spätmittelalter zur frühen Neuzeit in der Musikgeschichte, [in:] Traditionswandel und Traditionsverhalten, ed. W. Haug und B. Wachinger, Tubingen 1991, p. 145–178.
Google Scholar

Palisca C.V., Ut oratoria musica: The rhetorical basis of musical mannerism, [in:] C.V. Palisca, Studies in the History of Italian Music and Music Theory, Oxford 1994, p. 282–311.
Google Scholar

di Pisidia Giorgio, Carmi, ed. L. Tartaglia, Torino 1998, p. 475.
Google Scholar

Theodori Prodromi Tetrasticha in Sacras Scripturas, Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, ed. J.-P. Migne Paris 1857–1866, vol. CXXXIII, col. 1180A.
Google Scholar

Gonnelli F., Le Sacre Scritture e i generi poetici a Bisanzio, [in:] La Scrittura infinita. Bibbia e poesia in eta medievale e umanistica, ed. F. Stella, Firenze 2001, p. 393–429, alle p. 415–417.
Google Scholar

Лавров П.A., Материалы по истории возникновения древнейшей славянской письменности, Ленинград 1930.
Google Scholar

Ангелов Б., Из старата българска, руска и сръбска литература, vol. I, София 1958.
Google Scholar

Ягич В., Служебные минеи на сентябрь, октябрь и ноябрь в цековно-славянском переводе по русским рукописям 1095–1097 г., Санкт-Петербург 1886.
Google Scholar

Кирило-Мeтодиевска енциклопедия, vol. I–IV, София 1985–2003., vol. II, София 1995, p. 125–126, 213–215.
Google Scholar

Published

2013-12-30

How to Cite

Diddi, C. (2013). The Church Slavonic Biblical ‘Thematic Clues’ in the Context of European Rhetoric and Literary Traditions (Remarks for a Chapter in Historical Poetics). Studia Ceranea, 3, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.01

Issue

Section

Articles