Ethical Aspects of Social Research: Old Concerns in the Face of New Challenges and Paradoxes. A Reflection from the Field of Biographical Method

Kaja Kaźmierska

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.08

Authors

Kaja Kaźmierska University of Lodz, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-7273

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.08

Keywords:

Ethical Concerns, Archiving, Big Qualidata, Biographical Research

Abstract

The paper deals with the ethical aspects of the research process and contemporary changes in this field, which make the discussion on ethical dilemmas and concerns more dynamic and varied. Although in natural science and social sciences one can find a common ground related to the most general ethical principles. In the article I refer primarily to the social sciences. The article discusses three aspects affecting the dynamics of ethical discussions: the development of research in the field of natural sciences leading to many ethical dilemmas and forcing ethical codification of research proceedings also in the area of social sciences; the increase in sensitivity and social consciousness and not only awareness of research as such (processes of democratization, emphasizing human and animal rights, protection of minority rights, the process of individualization); the dynamics of contemporary social changes resulting from the development of technology, especially the Internet, which has become a global resource of data and their exchange. This forces qualitative researchers to consider the issue of data archiving, their reanalysis, and determining the boundary for creating Big Qualidata from them. The article discusses these three dimensions, with particular emphasis on the last of them, which will be commented on in relation to the specific methodological approach, which is biographical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bertaux, Daniel. 1981. Biography and Society. The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70:4-28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102

Czyżewski, Marek. 1992. “Uwagi o badaniach biograficznych [Comments on Biographical Research].” Pp. 93-100 in Bunty i służebność uczonego: profesor Józef Chałasiński [Rebellion and Servitude of the Scholar: Professor Józef Chałasiński], edited by L. Wojtczak. Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ.
Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman and Michael Giardina. 2007. “Introduction: Ethical Futures in Qualitative Research.” Pp. 9-44 Ethical Futures in Qualitative Research: Decolonizing the Politics of Knowledge, edited by N. Denzin and M. Giardina. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Google Scholar

Dopierała, Renata and Katarzyna Waniek. 2016. Biografia i wojna. Metoda biograficzno w badaniu procesów społecznych. Wybór tekstów [Biography and War. The Biographical Method in the Study of Social Processes]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ.
Google Scholar

Galewicz, Włodzimierz. 2009. “O etyce badań naukowych [On the Ethics of Scientific Research].” Diametros 19:48-57.
Google Scholar

Gluza, Zbigniew. 2002. “Archiwa Społeczne [Social Archives].” KARTA 36:140-142.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00201

Goble, Erika et al. 2012. “Habits of Mind and the Split-Mind Effect: When Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software Is Used in Phenomenological Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(2). Retrieved March 10, 2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1709
Google Scholar

Hammersley, Martyn. 2009. “Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues.” Sociological Research Online 15(1)5. Retrieved March 06, 2020 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2076

Hammersley, Martyn and Anna Traianou. 2012. Ethics in Qualitative Research. Controversies and Contexts. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957619

Hammersley, Martyn and Anna Traianou. 2014. “An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research.” Sociological Research Online 19(3)24. Retrieved March 06, 2020 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/24.html
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3466

Kaźmierska, Kaja. 2018. “Doing Biographical Research—Ethical Concerns in Changing Social Contexts.” Polish Sociological Review 3:393-411.
Google Scholar

Kincaid, Harold, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie. 2007. Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.001.0001

Klockars, Carl B. 2000. “Field Ethics for the Life History.” Pp. 377-399 in Street Ethnography, edited by R. S. Wappner. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2019. Advances in Contemplative Social Research. Lodz, Cracow: Wydawnictwo UŁ, Jagiellonian University Press.
Google Scholar

Kohn, Tamara and Cris Shore. 2017. “The Ethics of University Ethics Committees: Risk Management and the Research Imagination.” Pp. 229-249 in Death of the Public University?, edited by S. Wright and C. Shore. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04bj2.17

Mead, Margaret. 1970. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Garden City, NY: Doubleday for the American Museum of Natural History.
Google Scholar

Mauthner, Natasha S. 2014. “Digital Data Sharing: A Genealogical and Performative Perspective.” Studia Socjologiczne 3:177-186.
Google Scholar

Mauthner, Natasha S. 2019. “Toward a Posthumanist Ethics of Qualitative Research in a Big Data Era.” American Behavioral Scientist 63(6):669-698.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218792701

Merrill, Barbara and Linden West. 2009. Using Biographical Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028990

Miller, Tina and Linda Bell. 2002. “Consenting What? Issues of Access, Gate-Keeping and ‘Informed’ Consent.” Pp. 53-69 in Ethics in Qualitative Research, edited by M. Mauthner et al. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Nora, Pierre. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26:7-24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.1989.26.1.99p0274v

Ogburn, William F. 1922. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
Google Scholar

Potter, Van Rensselaer. 1971. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Przanowski, Karol. 2014. Credit Scoring w erze Big Data. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Google Scholar

Rancew-Sikora, Dorota and Borys Cymbrowski. 2016. “W stronę socjologicznego ujęcia etyki badań naukowych [Towards a Sociological Understanding of Research Ethics].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 12(3):22-39.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.12.3.02

Schütze, Fritz. 2003. “Hülya’s Migration to Germany as Self-Sacrifice Undergone and Suffered in Love for her Parents, and her Later Biographical Individualisation. Biographical Problems and Biographical Work of Marginalisation and Individualisation of a Young Turkish Woman in Germany.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4(3). Retrieved July 07, 2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/671
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 2008. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews—Part One and Two.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1/2:153-242, 243-298; 3/4:6-77.
Google Scholar

Shaw, Clifford R. 1966. The Jack-Roller. A Delinquent Boy’s Own Story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226074962.001.0001

Szczepański, Jan. 1982. “Foreword.” Sisyphus Sociological Studies 2:7-8.
Google Scholar

Thomas, William I. and Florian Znaniecki. 1918-1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, Vol. I-V. Boston: Richard G. Badger.
Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward. 1990. Envisioning Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Google Scholar

Ventura-Juncá, Patricio. 2011. “Science and Ethics: Bridge to the Future for Regenerative Medicine.” International Journal of Stem Cells 4:79-84.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc.2011.4.2.79

Waniek, Katarzyna. 2019. “Emigration of Władek Wiśniewski As an Escape—A Reinterpretation of The Polish Peasant in Europe and America Volume 3 in Light of the Autobiographical Narrative Interview Method.” Przegląd Socjologiczny 4:49-73.
Google Scholar

Wawrzyniak, Jan. 2005. “Aksjologiczność i etyczność nauk społecznych [Axiology and Ethicality of Social Sciences].” Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 24:59-76.
Google Scholar

Wierzchoś, Dariusz. 2008. Zwyczajne życie zwykłych ludzi. Losy archiwum Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Pamiętnikarstwa [The Ordinary Life of Ordinary People. The Fate of the Archives of the Friends of Memoirs Society]. Retrieved March 10, 2020 http://histmag.org
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski, Ryszard. 2005. “O trudnościach wpływania etyki na moralność, czyli o różnych wymiarach i granicach absolutyzacji i deabsolutyzacji etyki [On the Difficulties of Influencing Ethics on Morality, That Is, On Various Dimensions and Limits of the Absolutization and Deabsolutization of Ethics].” Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 24:29-42.
Google Scholar

Zimmer, Michael. 2010. “‘But the Data Is Already Public’: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.” Ethics and Information Technology 12:313-325.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Żulicki, Remigiusz. 2017. “Potencjał big data w badaniach społecznych [Big Data Potential in Social Research].” Studia Socjologiczne 3:175-207.
Google Scholar