Southern Rural Feminism: U.S. Women Farmers in Production Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.19.2.02Keywords:
Gender, U.S. Women Farmers, Southern United States, Southern Rural Feminism, Intersectionality, Agriculture IndustryAbstract
Although U.S. women’s contributions to farming are vital, scholarship on U.S. female farmers is limited, especially in the U.S. South. Twelve women farmers in the Southern United States were interviewed about their experiences and opportunities in production agriculture. This study offers further nuance of the sociological and theoretical complexity and interpretive power of difference feminism and intersectionality, focusing on region and place, to a concept we call Southern Rural Feminism. Participants promote women’s equality yet acknowledge gender differences between the binary gender categories of men and women, where the uniqueness of a woman’s touch offers value to the agriculture industry. Nearly all participants’ everyday life in southern agriculture was grounded in the participants’ Christian faith, and some women used Christianity to explain gender dynamics. Within the context of the traditional rural southern culture, all women experienced differential gendered treatment in the industry, from welcomed gentlemanly behavior and gendered slights to more severe discrimination and harassment. Despite widespread gender problems, findings suggest most women do not view systematic gender oppression in the industry, do not adhere to feminist labels, and are cautiously optimistic about the future of female farmers. Incorporating theoretical discussions of Southern Rural Feminism is vital given U.S. Southern Farm Women’s restricted material access to land, and full participation in production agriculture, a field with tremendous gender inequities.
Downloads
References
Alan, Patricia and Carolyn Sachs. 2007. “Women and Food Chains: The Gendered Politics of Food.” International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 15(1):1-23.
Google Scholar
American Farm. 2022. “Commodities by Region.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.americanfarmmortgage.com/about/commodities-by-region.html
Google Scholar
Anderson, Joseph L. 2020. “‘You’re a Bigger Man’: Technology and Agrarian Masculinity in Postwar America.” Agricultural History 94(1):1-23.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3098/ah.2020.094.1.004
An-Vo, Duc-Anh, Mushtaq Shahbaz, and Geoff Cockfield. 2022. “Nuanced Assessment of Livelihood Resilience through the Intersectional Lens of Gender and Ethnicity: Evidence from Small-Scale Farming Communities in the Upland Regions of Vietnam.” Journal of Rural Studies 92:68-78.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.011
Avanza, Martina. 2019. “Using a Feminist Paradigm (Intersectionality) to Study Conservative Women: The Case of Pro-Life Activists in Italy.” Politics & Gender 16(2):552-580.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18001034
Ball, Jennifer A. 2014. “She Works Hard for the Money: Women in Kansas Agriculture.” Agriculture and Human Values 31(4):593-605.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9504-8
Barroso, Amanda. 2020. “61% of U.S. Women Say ‘Feminist’ Describes Them Well; Many See Feminism as Empowering, Polarizing.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
Google Scholar
Beach, Sarah S. 2013. “Tractorettes or Partners? Farmers’ Views on Women in Kansas Farming Households.” Rural Sociology 78(2):210-228.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12008
Brandth, Berit. 2002. “On the Relationship between Feminism and Farm Women.” Agriculture and Human Values 19(2):107-117.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016011527245
Brandth, Berit and Marit S. Haugen. 1997. “Rural Women, Feminism and the Politics of Identity.” Sociologia Ruralis 37(3):325-344.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00053
Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77-101.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” Pp. 57-71 in APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, vol. 2, edited by H. Cooper et al. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Charles, Kerwin Kofi, Jonathan Guryan, and Jessica Pan. 2022. “The Effects of Sexism on American Women: The Role of Norms vs. Discrimination.” Journal of Human Resources. doi: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0920-11209R3
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0920-11209R3
Cheded, Mohammed and Alexandros Skandalis. 2021. “Touch and Contact during COVID‐19: Insights from Queer Digital Spaces.” Gender, Work & Organization 28:340-347.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12697
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. “Gender, Black Feminism, and Black Political Economy.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568(1):41-53.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716200568001005
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2017. “Intersectionality and Epistemic Injustice.” Pp. 115-124 in Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by J. Medina. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043-11
Contzen, Sandra and Jeremie Forney. 2017. “Family Farming and Gendered Division of Labor on the Move: A Typology of Farming-Family Configurations.” Agriculture and Human Values 34:27-40.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9687-2
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex.” Feminist Legal Theory 1:57-80.
Google Scholar
Fremstad, Anders and Mark Paul. 2020. “Opening the Farm Gate to Women? The Gender Gap in U.S. Agriculture.” Journal of Economic Issues 54(1):124-141.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1720569
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Hall, Allen and Veronika Mogyorody. 2007. “Organic Farming, Gender, and the Labor Process.” Rural Sociology 72(2):289-316.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170035
Hoppe, Robert A. and Penni Korb. 2013. “Characteristics of Women Farm Operators and Their Farms.” USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin no. 111.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2266538
Horst, Megan and Amy Marion. 2019. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Inequities in Farmland Ownership and Farming in the U.S.” Agriculture and Human Values 36(1):1-16.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9883-3
Katz, Lauren T. 2020. “Tearing Down the Maternal Wall in the Legal Profession: A Perspective Inspired by Difference Feminism.” The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 22:213-250.
Google Scholar
Keller, Julie C. 2014. “I Wanna Have My Own Damn Dairy Farm!’ Women Farmers, Legibility, and Femininities in Rural Wisconsin, U.S.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences 29(1):76-102.
Google Scholar
Kennedy-Duckett, Maryellen. 2022. “The Barriers Women Face in Agriculture.” National Geographic. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/partner-content-empowering-female-farmers
Google Scholar
Lockhart, Kassaundra S. 2021. “Black Women Are Aiming to Change the Landscape of Agriculture.” Women Advance. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.womenadvancenc.org/2021/02/25/black-women-are-aiming-to-change-the-landscape-of-agriculture/
Google Scholar
Meares, Alison. 1997. “Making the Transition from Conventional to Sustainable Agriculture: Gender, Social Movement Participation, and Quality of Life on the Family Farm.” Rural Sociology 62(1):21-47
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1997.tb00643.x
Minnesota Department of Revenue. 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/guide/defining-agricultural-production
Google Scholar
Neustaeter, Robin. 2015. “Situated Feminism, Rurality and Women’s Learning in Rural Manitoba, Canada.” Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education 27(2 SE):100-119.
Google Scholar
Norman, Jim. 2018. “The Religious Regions of the U.S.” Gallup News. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://news.gallup.com/poll/232223/religious-regions.aspx
Google Scholar
Nusbaumer, Michael R. 2011. “Rural Masculinity and Antique Tractors: Reliving the Men in the Machines.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences 26(2):101-125.
Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2022. “Modeling the Future of Religion in America.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/
Google Scholar
Pilgeram, Ryanne, Katherine Dentzman, and Paul Lewin. 2022. “Women, Race and Place in US Agriculture.” Agriculture and Human Values 39(4):1341-1355.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10324-3
Rushing, Wanda. 2017. “No Place for a Feminist: Intersectionality and the Problem South: SWS Presidential Address.” Gender & Society 31(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217701083
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217701083
Sachs, Carolyn. 1983. The Invisible Farmers: Women in Agriculture Production. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.
Google Scholar
Sachs, Carolyn E. et al., eds. 2021. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Agriculture. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199752
Saugeres, Lise. 2002. “Of Tractors and Men: Masculinity, Technology, and Power in a French Farming Community.” Sociologia Ruralis 42(2):142-159.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00207
Schmidt, Claudia, Stephan J. Goetz, and Zheng Tian. 2021. “Female Farmers in the United States: Research Needs and Policy Questions.” Food Policy 101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102039
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102039
Tavenner, Katie and Todd A. Crane. 2019. “Beyond ‘Women and Youth’: Applying Intersectionality in Agricultural Research for Development.” Outlook on Agriculture 48(4):316-325.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019884334
United States Department of Agriculture. 2012. “Study: Undergraduate Women Outnumber Men in Land-Grant Ag Programs.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2012/07/24/study-undergraduate-women-outnumber-men-land-grant-ag-programs
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2021. “Women in Agriculture.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/initiatives/women-agriculture
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2022. “Former Secretaries.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/history/former-secretaries#
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2017. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Outreach and Advocacy Division. 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs141p2_015583.pdf
Google Scholar
Wheeler, Rebecca et al. 2021. Loneliness and Social Isolation in Farming Communities: Summary of Research Findings. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://fcn.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Loneliness-social-isolation-in-farming_FINAL-01.11.21.pdf
Google Scholar
Whitehead, Andrew L. and Samuel L. Perry. 2019. “Is a ‘Christian America’ a More Patriarchal America? Religion, Politics, and Traditionalist Gender Ideology.” Canadian Review of Sociology 56(2):151-177.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12241
Whitt, Christine and Todd, Jessica E. 2021. “Women Identified as Operators on 51 Percent of U.S. Farms in 2019.” USDA Economic Research Service. Retrieved April 17, 2023 https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2021/june/women-identified-as-operators-on-51-percent-of-us-farms-in-2019/
Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3):193-209.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.