Grounded Theory and Serendipity. Natural history of a Research

Krzysztof Tomasz Konecki

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.09

Authors

Krzysztof Tomasz Konecki Lodz University, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.09

Keywords:

Grounded theory, Serendipity, Qualitative sociology, Field research, Natural history of research, Sociology of interaction, Social world, Human-animals – non-human animals interactions, Anthropomorphization of animals

Abstract

The paper deals with the issue of “serendipity” (which constitutes the context of discovery) in field research and the analysis of data by using the grounded theory methodology. The thesis of the paper is: the methodology of grounded theory is naturally associated with serendipity. We describe two aspects of serendipity in grounded theory: 1. substantive, and 2. theoretical. We present in the paper serendipity phenomenon by using the case of research on the “social world of pet owners”. We show how the research is developed by a sequence of decisions being made by researchers. The process of emergence of the main analytical category, subcategories and the whole theoretical construction during the long time of the field research and theoretical group analysis is presented, as well as the procedure of coming to unanticipated theoretical conclusions. It was all possible because of the interactional character of serendipity happening during the research in grounded theory style of investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Krzysztof Tomasz Konecki, Lodz University, Poland

Krzysztof T. Konecki is a Professor of Sociology, chair of Organizational and Management Sociology Department, Lodz University, Poland, Vice - President of Qualitative Research Network of European Sociological Association. His major research areas are: qualitative sociology, grounded theory, symbolic interactionism, visual sociology, sociology of management and organization, sociology of work, organizational symbolism, Japanese culture and management, human-non-human-animals relationships.

References

Charmaz, Kathy (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Clarke, Adele (2003) “Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction 2(4): 553 – 576.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553

Clarke, Adele (1991) “Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory.” Pp. 119 – 158 in Social Organization and social Process. Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by D. Maines. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Google Scholar

Dlugosz – Kurczabowa, Krystyna (2003) The New Polish Etymological Dictionary. Warsaw: PWN (in Polish)
Google Scholar

Fine, Gary Allan and James Deegan (1996) “Three Principles Of Serendipity: Insight, Chance, And Discovery In Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Studies in Education 9(4): 434 – 447.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090405

Glaser, Barney (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Judith Holton (2004) Remodeling Grounded Theory [80 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5(2). Retrieved January 2005 http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqstexte/2-04/2-04glaser-e.htm
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Hannan, Patrick J. (2006) Serendipity, Luck and Wisdom in Research. Lincoln: iUniverse.
Google Scholar

Kacperczyk, Anna (2005) “Application of the concept of social worlds in empirical research.” Pp. 167 – 189 in The Construction of Self and Society. European Variants of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by K. Konecki and E. Halas. Warszawa: Scholar (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof (2004) A private presentation of interactional contexts. Analysis of photographs of pets. A paper presented at the XII Sociological Convention in Poznań, 15 –18 September, 2004 available at http://www.krzysztofkonecki.prv.pl/ in Polish.
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof (2000) A study of the qualitative research methodology. Grounded theory. Warsaw: PWN (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (2002 [1949]) Man meets Dog (So kam der Mensch auf dem Hund), London-New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166086

Lowe, Brian M. (2002) “Hearts and Minds and Morality: Analyzing Moral Vocabularies in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology 25(1): 105 – 123.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014312425831

McCallin, Antoinette (2004) “Pluralistic dialoguing: A theory of interdisciplinary teamworking.” The Grounded Theory Review 4(1): 25 – 42.
Google Scholar

Merton, Robert (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, London: The Free Press, Collier – Macmillan Ltd.
Google Scholar

Merton, Robert (1968a) “The Mathew Effect in Science.” Science 159(3810): 56 – 63.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Merton, Robert K. and Elinor Barber (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princenton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Nathaniel, Alvita K. (2004) “A Grounded Theory of Moral Reckoning in Nursing.” The Grounded Theory Review 4(1): 43 – 58.
Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans (1938) Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Roberts, Royston M. (1989) Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. Toronto: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven (2004) “The Accidental Scientist.” American Scientist Online 93 (July– August). Retrieved 03.2008 http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookReviewTypeDetail/assetid/34011
Google Scholar

Shibutani, Tamotsu (1994) “Reference Group as Perspectives.” Pp. 128 – 145, in Symbolic Interaction. An Introduction to Social Psychology, edited by N. Herman, L. Reynolds. Dix Hills, New York: General Hall Inc.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm (1993) Continual Permutations of Action, New York: Aldine.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842

Strauss, Anselm (1982) “Social World and Legitimization Processes.” Pp. 171 - 190 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by Norman Denzin. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, volume 4.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm (1978) “A social world perspective.” Pp. 119 - 128 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by N. Denzin. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, volume 1: 119 – 128.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin editors (1997) Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin editors, (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Sykes, G., Matza David (1979) “Techniques of Neutralization: A theory of Delinquency.” Pp. 497 – 504 in Social Interaction. Introductory Readings in Sociology, edited by H. Robboy, S. Greenblatt and C. Clark. New York: St. Martin Press.
Google Scholar

Van Andel, Pek (1994) "Anatomy of the unsought finding: serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability." British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45(2): 631-648.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.2.631