”We can’t just do it any which way” – Objectivity Work among Swedish Prosecutors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.03Keywords:
Objectivity work, Prosecutors, Accounts, Ethnomethodology, Constructionism, SwedenAbstract
Objectivity is a principle widely acknowledged and honoured in contemporary society. Rather than treating objectivity as an a priori defined category to be tested empirically, I refer to the construction of objectivity as it is accomplished in practice as “objectivity work” and consider how Swedish prosecutors in interviews make and communicatively realize (i.e. “make real”) its claims. In analyzing two facets of objectivity work – maintaining objectivity and responses to objectivity violations – seven mechanisms are identified: appeals to (1) regulation, (2) duty, and (3) professionalism; responses to violations by (4) incantations of objectivity, (5) corrections, (6) proclamation by contrast, and (7) appeals to human fallibility. Directions for future research emphasize cross-cultural and crossoccupational comparisons, not only within the judiciary as objectivity is of a general concern in any area where disinterested truths are claimed. The concept of objectivity work allows one to study how various actors bring principle into everyday life.
Downloads
References
Adelswärd, Viveka (1989) ”Defendants’ Interpretations of Encouragements in Court: The Construction of Meaning in an Institutional Context.” Journal of Pragmatics 13:741-749.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90076-3
Adelswärd, Viveka, Karin Aronsson and Per Linell (1988) “Discourse of blame. Courtroom construction of social reality from the perspective of the defendant.” Semiotica 71:261-284.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1988.71.3-4.261
Akerström, Malin, Katarina Jacobsson and David Wästerfors (2003) ”Reanalysis of Previously Collected Material.” Pp. 344-357 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Anleu, Sharyn Roach and Kathy Mack (2005) “Magistrates’ Everyday Work and Emotional Labour.” Journal of Law and Society 32(4): 590-614.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00339.x
Atkinson, Maxwell J. and Paul Drew (1979) Order in Court. The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: The MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell, J. (1992) ”Displaying Neutrality: Formal Aspects of Informal Court Proceedings.” Pp. 199-211 in Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: University Press.
Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul (1992) ”The Ethnography of a Medical Setting: Reading, Writing and Rhetoric.” Qualitative Health Research 2 (4):451-474.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239200200406
Bandes, Susan, A. editor (1999) The passions of law. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. P. (1994) ”The Myth of Discretion.” Pp. 129-162 in The Uses of Discretion, edited by K. Hawkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Beagan, Brenda, L. (2000) “Neutralizing differences: producing neutral doctors for (almost) neutral patients.” Social Science & Medicine 51:1253-1265.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00043-5
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R. (1998) ”Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3-4):279-294.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
Billig, Michael (1996) Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. (1992) ”Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: the Case of News- Interview Discourse.” Pp. 163-198 in Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: University Press.
Google Scholar
Conley, John M. and William M O’Barr (1990) Rules Versus Relationships. The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Diesen, Christian, Claes Lernestedt, Torun Lindholm and Tove Pettersson (2005) Likhet inför lagen. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M. and Blair Paley (1994) ”Organizational Horizons and Complaint Filing.” Pp. 231-248 in The Uses of Discretion, edited by K. Hawkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Eriksson, Katarina (1995) “Motsträvighet som anomali i rättsväsendet – poliser och åklagare om kvinnomisshandel.” SOU 1995:60, del B. Kvinnofrid – huvudbetänkande från Kvinnovåldskommissionen.
Google Scholar
Free, Marvin D. (2002) ”Race and Presentencing Decisions in the United States: A Summary and Critique of the Research.” Criminal Justice Review 27 (2):203-226.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680202700202
Frohmann, Lisa (1997) ”Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decisionmaking.” Law & Society Review 31 (3):531- 555.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3054045
Frohmann, Lisa (1996) ”Hard Cases: Prosecutorial Accounts for Filing Unconvictable Sexual Assault Complaints.” Current Research on Occupations and Professions 9:189-209.
Google Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa (1991) ”Discrediting Victims’ Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections.” Social Problems 38 (2):213-226.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800530
Garfinkel, Harold (1988) ”Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc.” Sociological Theory 6:103-109.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/201918
Harris, Lloyd C. (2002) “The emotional labour of barristers: an exploration of emotional labour by status professionals.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (4): 553-584.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00303
Hobbs, Pamela (2003) ”’Is that what we’re here about?’: a Lawyer’s Use of Impression Management in a Closing Argument at Trial.” Discourse and Society 14 (3):273-290.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030143002
Holsánová, Jana (1998) ”Att byta röst och rädda ansiktet. Citatanvändning i samtal om ’de andra’.” Språk & Stil 8:105-133.
Google Scholar
Holstein, James A. (1993) Court-Ordered Insanity: Interpretive Practice and Involuntary Commitment. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Holstein, James A. and Gale Miller (2003) “Social Constructionism and Social Problems Work.” Pp. 70-91 in Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by J. A. Holstein and G. Miller. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium (2000) Constructing the Life Course. 2nd ed. New York: General Hall.
Google Scholar
Hughes, Geoffrey (1994) ”The Historical Development of the Register Barrier in Professional Language.” Pp. 37-47 in Text and Talk in Professional Contexts, edited by B-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, and B. Nordberg, B. Uppsala: The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics.
Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Katarina (2000) Retoriska strider. Konkurrerande sanningar i dövvärlden. (Diss.) Lund: Palmkrons förlag.
Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Katarina (2005) Mutor och moral – motstridiga versioner i svenska rättsfall. Network for Research in Criminology and Deviant Behavior at Lund University. Lund: Department of Sociology.
Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Katarina and David Wästerfors (2003) ”På tal om mutor.” Pp. 109-122 in Förebyggande metoder mot ekobrott. En antologi. Rapport 2003:10. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet.
Google Scholar
Karstedt, Susanne (2002) “Emotions and Criminal Justice.” Theoretical Criminology 6(3):299- 317.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136248060200600304
Katz, Jack (2001) ”From How to Why. On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography (Part 1).” Ethnography 2 (4):443-473.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146613801002004001
Komter, Martha L. (1994) ”Accusations and Defences in Courtroom Interaction.” Discourse & Society 5 (2):165-187.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002002
Lange, Bettina. 2002. “The Emotional Dimension in Legal Regulation.” Journal of Law and Society 29 (1):197-225.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00216
Latour, Bruno (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Madeleine (1996) Etiken i juridiken. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
Google Scholar
Linell, Per and Linda Jönsson (1991) “Suspect stories: perspective-setting in an asymmetrical situation.” Pp. 75-100 in Asymmetries in Dialogue, edited by I. Marková and K. Foppa. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Lutfey, Karen (2004) “Assessment, Objectivity, and Interaction: The Case of Patient Compliance With Medical Treatment Regimens.” Social Psychology Quarterly 67(4):343- 368.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250406700402
Ma, Yue (2002) ”Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A Comparative Perspective.” International Criminal Justice Review 12:22-52.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105756770201200102
Maynard, Douglas W. and John F. Manzo (1993) ”On the Sociology of Justice: Theoretical Notes From an Actual Jury Deliberation.” Sociological Theory 11 (2):171-193.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202141
Mac Murray, Bruce K. (1988) ”The Nonprosecution of Sexual Abuse and Informal Justice.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 3 (2):197-202.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088626088003002006
Miller, Gale (1991) Enforcing the Work Ethic: The Rhetoric and Everyday Life in a Work Incentive Program. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Nordqvist, Petra (2003) Med åtskillnad som medel – polisers och åklagares berättelser om mutor. Network for Research in Criminology and Deviant Behavior at Lund University. Lund: Department of Sociology.
Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1998) Ideology in the Language of Judges. How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan (1997) “Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analysing Naturally Occurring Talk.” Pp. 145-160 in Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. Edited by D. Silverman. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan (1996) Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119
Rainville, Gerard (2001) ”An Analysis of Factors Related to Prosecutor Sentencing Preferences.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 12 (4):295-310.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403401012004003
Rogers, Linda J. and Edna Erez (1999) “The Contextuality of Objectivity in Sentencing Among Legal Professionals in South Australia.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27:267-286.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijsl.1999.0092
Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman. (1968) ”Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33:46-62.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
Snow, David. A. & Anderson, Leon (1987) “Identity Work Among the Homeless: The Verbal Construction and Avowal of Personal Identities.” The American Journal of Sociology 92 (6): 1336-1371.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228668
Spohn, Cassia, Dawn Beichner, and Erika Davis-Frenzel (2001) ”Prosecutorial Justification for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: ’Guarding the Gateway to Justice’.” Social Problems 48 (2):206-235.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206
Steinberg, Allen (1984) ”From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: Criminal Prosecution, the District Attorney, and American Legal History.” Crime & Delinquency 30 (4):568-592.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128784030004007
TI (2006) “Corruption Perceptions Index.” Transparency International. Available online. Retrieved March 2008 http://www.transparency.org
Google Scholar
Wennstam, Katarina (2004) En riktig våldtäktsman: en bok om samhällets syn på våldtäkt. Stockholm: Bonnier.
Google Scholar
Wilmot, Keith A. and Cassia Spohn (2004) ”Prosecutorial Discretion and Real-Offense Sentencing: An Analysis of Relevant Conduct Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 15 (3):324-343.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403403259434
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.