The epistemic status of the principles of justice in Habermas and Rawls

Autor

  • Gunnar Skirbekk University of Bergen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.38.07

Słowa kluczowe:

The Rawls-Habermas debate, principles of justice, validity claims, truth, justification

Abstrakt

The debate between Habermas and Rawls that took place in 1990s concerned how philosophy can justify the principles of justice under the conditions of pluralism of different and irreconcilable moral, philosophical, and religious doctrines. The context of the debate was mainly Rawls’ Political Liberalism and Habermas’ Between Facts and Norms as well. This paper argues that a wider geo-cultural perspective is pertinent in order to better comprehend the different justification strategies in Habermas and Rawls, concerning the principle of justice. This goes for their different geo-cultural experiences and presuppositions – in short, Rawls living in a self-confident North America in the post-war period versus Habermas’ German experience of civilization breakdown. However, it might also be relevant for the assessment of these two strategies in our time, faced with new kinds of geo-political differences and conflicts.

Biogram autora

Gunnar Skirbekk - University of Bergen

Professor Emeritus

Bibliografia

Apel, K.-O. (1998). Auseinandersetzungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar

Böhler, D., Kettner, M., and Skirbekk, G. (2003). Reflexion und Verantwortung, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 44–64.
Google Scholar

Finlayson, J. G. (2019). The Habermas-Rawls Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/finl16410

Finlayson, J. G. and Freyenhagen, F. (2011) (eds). Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political, eds. James Gordon Finlayson and Fabian Freyenhagen. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723869

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest, 16, pp. 3–18.
Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Habermas, J. (2019). Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Google Scholar

Kędziora, K. (2019). Habermas and Rawls on an Epistemic Status of the Principle of Justice. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, 34, pp. 31–46.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.34.03

Langvatn, S. A. (2013). The Idea and Ideal of Public Reason. John Rawls’ Attempt to Conceptualize a Well-ordered Constitutional Democracy. University of Bergen: Bergen.
Google Scholar

Rohs, P. (2013). Der Platz zum Glauben. Münster: Mentis Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783897858688

Skirbekk, G. (1993). Rationality and Modernity. Oslo–Oxford: Scandinavian University Press–Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Skirbekk, G. (2017). Philosophie der Moderne: Vernunft, Wahrheit, Menschenwürde, Meinungsfreiheit. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845292489

Skirbekk, G. (2019). Epistemic Challenges in a Modern World. Zürich: LIT Verlag.
Google Scholar

Tetens, H. (2015). Gott denken. Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2021-12-21

Jak cytować

Skirbekk, G. (2021). The epistemic status of the principles of justice in Habermas and Rawls. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, (38), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.38.07

Numer

Dział

Articles