Territorial capital as a determinant of development processes in functional areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.319.04Keywords:
territorialisation, territorial capital, functional areas, integrationAbstract
The sectoral approach to shaping processes of development has recently started to lose ground to a territorial-based approach. The territorial approach has already become the leading paradigm for creating development policies on the EU level as well as on national and/or regional levels. This results from the growing role of territorial capital in the globalizing world – even though globalization is an undisputed fact, the development policies are increasingly emphasizing the need to adapt development plans to the existing, specific conditions characterizing each territory. Endogenic resources which in their entirety create territorial capital are typically located within the administrative borders of several, functionally inter-dependent territorial units. That is why individual communes (or other territorial units, i.e. districts or even regions) should not become the leading subjects of development policies as this role is best performed by entire functional areas. A functional area may cover the territory of anywhere from several to over a dozen communes and/ or districts located in not just one administrative region and as such requires that an integrative approach to steering development processes is applied. The article aims at analyzing the changes in perception of the ‘territorial capital’ concept as well as at highlighting its growing importance with regards to development processes. The authors will also indicate the possible dimensions in which integration of the approach to steering development processes is possible.
Downloads
References
Appadurai A. (2005), Nowoczesność bez granic. Kulturowe wymiary globalizacji, Wydawnictwo Universitas, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Asheim B., Cooke P. (1998), Localised innovation networks in a global economy: a comparative analysis of endogenous and exogenous regional development approaches, „Comparative SocialResearch”, JAI Press, Stamford, vol. 17.
Google Scholar
Berti, G. (2011), Weaving the rural web: The dynamics of rural development in Lunigiana, „Quaderni Sismondi”, no. 12(4).
Google Scholar
Blair J. P. (1995), Local Economic Development: Analysis and Practice, Sage, London.
Google Scholar
Brenner N. (2004), New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York.
Google Scholar
Camagni R. (2009), Territorial capital and regional development, [in:] R. Capello: Nijkamp (Eds) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Google Scholar
Castells M. (2008), Społeczeństwo sieci, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Domański R. (2001), The innovative city, House of Poznań University of Economics, Poznań.
Google Scholar
ESPON (2013), SPAN-3. Spatial Perspectives at Nuts-3 Level.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2005), The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union. Towards a Stronger European Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions. A Background Document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, EC, Luxemburg.
Google Scholar
Klasik A. (1997), Koncepcje rozwoju regionalnego Polski na tle zróżnicowań regionalnych, stenogram z seminarium na temat: Rozwój regionalny Polski jako element integracji europejskiej, Sejm RP, 22 kwietnia 1997
Google Scholar
Kudłacz T. (1999), Programowanie rozwoju regionalnego, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Markowski T. (2013), Flexible and integrative planning in functional urban areas – towards a new approach to spatial planning, [in:] Gaczek W.M. (ed.): Dynamika, cele i polityka zintegrowanego rozwoju regionów – aspekty teoretyczne i zarządzanie w przestrzeni, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Markowski T. (2015), Zintegrowane planowanie rozwoju – dylematy i wyzwania, „Studia KPZK”, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warszawa, no 161.
Google Scholar
McGrew A. (2009), Globalization and Global Politics, [in:] Baylis J., Smith S., Owens P. (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Regional Development (2012), Koncepcja Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2030, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
OECD (2001), Territorial Outlook, OECD, Paris.
Google Scholar
Perman R., Ma Y., McGilvray, J. (1996), Natural and Environmental Resource Economics, Longan, London.
Google Scholar
Porter M. (1998), Clusters and the new economics of competition, „Harvard Business Review”, November-December.
Google Scholar
Przygodzki Z. (2015), Integracja procesu planowania rozwoju. Uwagi metodyczne i sposoby wdrażania planowania zintegrowanego, tekst niepublikowany.
Google Scholar
Scholte J. A. (1997), Global Capitalism and the State, „International Affairs”, no. 73 (3).
Google Scholar
Scott A. J. (2001), Globalization and the Rise of City-regions, „European Planning Studies”, vol. 9, no 7.
Google Scholar
Storper M. (1997), The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, Guilford Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Szlachta J. (1996), Główne problemy polityki rozwoju regionalnego Polski na przełomie XX i XXI wieku, [in:] Strategiczne wyzwania dla polityki rozwoju regionalnego Polski, Wyd. Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
van der Ploeg, J. D., van Broekhuizen, R., Brunori, G., Sonnino, R., Knickel, K., Tisenkopfs, T., Oostindie, H. (2008), Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development, [in:] J. D. van der Ploeg, T.Marsden (eds), Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Google Scholar
Ventura, F., Brunori, G., Milone: & Berti, G. (2008), The rural web: A synthesis, in: J. D. van der Ploeg, T. Marsden (eds), Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Google Scholar