INVESTOR EXPERTISE AND THE RATIONALITY OF DECISION MAKING

Authors

  • Marcin Rzeszutek Collegium of Management and Finance, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • Monika Czerwonka Collegium of Management and Finance, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • Magdalena Walczak Collegium of Management and Finance, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.10

Keywords:

investor expertise, behavioral bias, rationality, behavioral finance

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to is to explore the determinants of the rationality in decision making among polish stock market investors with different level of expertise with investing. Rationality in decision making was defined from the behavioral finance point of view and was operationalized as the frequency of some behavioral biases (see: the certainty effect) within decision making process. In particular, this study aims to investigate the degree of susceptibility the certainty effect among people of various levels of expertise with investing. As  there is still a lack of data studies in behavioral finance literature investigating the issues mentioned in this article (or existing results are ambiguous) we treated our study as an exploratory research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcin Rzeszutek, Collegium of Management and Finance, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

1)      To whom correspondence should be addressed:

Marcin Rzeszutek, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Management and Finance, 02-554, Warsaw, Niepodleglosci 162, Poland. e-mail: mrzeszutek@o2.pl

 

 

References

Akerlof, G.A, & Schiller, R.J. (2009). How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Ewing, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Braun, P., & Janiw, I. (1992). A case study of expert judgment: economists' probabilities versus base-rate model forecasts. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5, 217-235.
Google Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1997). The process performance paradox in expert judgment: how can experts know so much and predict so badly. In: W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.). Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies (pp. 342-364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Camerer C., Loewenstein G. (2003). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. Mimeo: Carnegie Mellon University.
Google Scholar

De Bondt, W., & Thaler, R. (1987). Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. Journal of Finance, 3, 557-580.
Google Scholar

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 34-49.
Google Scholar

Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets II. Journal of Finance, 46, 1576-1612.
Google Scholar

Frąckowiak, W. (2010). Czy ukształtuje się nowy paradygmat finansów? [in:] Frąckowiak W., Szambelańczyk J. (eds.), Ku nowemu paradygmatowi nauk o finansach, Poznań, „ZeszytyNaukowe Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu”, no. 144.
Google Scholar

Gajdka, J. (2013). Behawioralne finanse przedsiębiorstw. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory, an analysis of decisions under risk. Economoterica, 47, 263-292.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341 – 350.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.
Google Scholar

Krems, J., & Zierer, C. (1994). Are experts immune to cognitive bias? Dependence of "confirmation bias" on specialist knowledge. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 41, 98-115.
Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago
Google Scholar

Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91.
Google Scholar

SPSS Inc. (2012). PASW Statistics 21 Core System User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Google Scholar

Stephan, E. (1998). Heuristics and biases in decision making: the role of incentives, ability, and expertise. Research Seminar held at the Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Google Scholar

Stephan, E., & Kiell, G. (2006). Decision processes in professional investors: does expertise moderate judgment biases? In: E. Hoezl (Ed.). Fairness and competition. Proceedings of the IAREP/SABE Conference (pp. 1-6). Vienna: WUV Universitaetsverlag.
Google Scholar

Szyszka, A. (2007). Wycena papierów wartościowych na rynku kapitałowym w świetle finansów behawioralnych [A behavioral finanse perspective on valuation of securities on the capital market]. Poznań, Poland: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu.
Google Scholar

Szyszka, A. (2010). Preferences and belief based models. In: H. K. Baker & J. Nofsinger (Eds.). Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets, (pp. 351 – 372). Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Tyszka, T., & Zielonka, P. (2002). Expert judgments: financial analysts vs. weather forecasters. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 3(3), 152-160.
Google Scholar

Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Ewing, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2015-11-27

How to Cite

Rzeszutek, M., Czerwonka, M., & Walczak, M. (2015). INVESTOR EXPERTISE AND THE RATIONALITY OF DECISION MAKING. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(310). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.10

Issue

Section

Neoclasical and behavioral finannce

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.