SHADOW BANKING AS SEEN FROM A BEHAVIOURAL AND NEOCLASSICAL FINANCE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.12Keywords:
shadow banking, behavioral finance, private moneyAbstract
Money is not merely a highly exchangeable commodity or the symbol of value established in exchange by utility-seeking individuals. Private money is a value sui generis that is established by reactions between issuers-shadow banking and users of money. These relations can be explained by the behavioral theory of finance and neoclassic theory of finance.
Shadow banking and classical banking relations are characterized by the relations of both cooperation/trust and conflict/struggle, which give private money its value and produce the alternating phases of order and disorder.
If the link between the public and the private sector is to be bypassed or severed, should this be seen as an exceptional emergency measure or the first step in radical structural change in the social relations for the production of money? The Neo-institutional answer on this question is that the shadow banking is now in the first phase of its institutionalization. Shadow banking is a fundamental and systemic financial innovation. It encompasses all financial activity, except traditional banking, which requires a private or public guarantee and backing to operate.Downloads
References
Claessens S., Ratnovski L., 2014, What Is Shadow Banking?, IMF Working Paper 25.
Google Scholar
Duca J. V., 2014, What Drives the Shadow Banking System in the Short and Long Run?, DALLASFED Working Paper 1401.
Google Scholar
Duhigg C., 2013, Siła nawyku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Financial Stability Board, 2013, Global Shadow Banking Monitoring Report 2012, Basel.
Google Scholar
Gorton G., Metrick A., 2012, Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo, Journal of Financial Economics 104(3), 425–451.
Google Scholar
Górka J., 2013, Efektywność instrumentów płatniczych w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Gruszecki T., 2013, Współczesne problemy pieniądza papierowego, In: J. J. Bednarczyk, M. Sobol (eds.), System finansowy wobec wyzwań rozwojowych, Spatum, Radom.
Google Scholar
Hartwell C. A., 2014, The Impact of Institutional Volatility on Financial Volatility in Transition Economics: A GARCH Family Approach, Moscow.
Google Scholar
Harutynyan A., Loukaionova E., Walton R., Korniyenko Y., Amidzic G., Sanab H. Abu, Shin H. S., 2014, Shedding Light on Shadow Banking, IMF Working Paper 10.
Google Scholar
Jansen D. J., Mosch R. H. J., Cruijsen C. A. B., 2013, When Does the General Public Lose Trust in Banks?, DNB Working Paper 402.
Google Scholar
McCulley P. A., 2007, Teton Reflections, Global Central Bank Focus Series, PIMCO, September.
Google Scholar
Niedziółka P., 2009, Kredytowe instrumenty pochodne a stabilność finansowa, SGH Monografie i Opracowania 563.
Google Scholar
Opolski K., Potocki T., 2013, Pojecie racjonalności w naukach ekonomicznych z perspektywy ekonomii behawioralnej, In: I. Bludnik, M. Ratajczak, J. Wallusch (eds.), Ekonomia. Teoria, historia, praktyka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Perotti E., 2012, The Roots of Shadow Banking, Duisenberg School of Finance Policy Paper 24.
Google Scholar
Pozsar Z., Tobias A., Ashcraft A., Boesky H., 2013, Shadow Banking, Economic Policy Review 19(2), 1–16.
Google Scholar
Schwarcz S. L., 2012, Regulating Shadow Banking, Review of Banking & Financial Law 31(2).
Google Scholar
Szpringer W., 2013, Shadow banking jako nowy obszar regulacji prawnej, Monitor Prawa Bankowego 6.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
