Narrow Banking from the Perspective of Risk

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.343.04

Keywords:

narrow banking, risk, transaction security, moral hazard, deposit insurance

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify risks arising from the attempt to stabilise the banking system with the use of narrow banking, which in practice means imposing restrictions on various types of assets held by banks and on handling current deposits. To this end, the following will be discussed: the nature and concepts of narrow banking and the risks of narrow banking. The research hypothesis is as follows: narrow banking is an effective concept to use to secure the stability of the financial system. The principal risk connected with the implementation of the concept of narrow banking results from: the cost of deposit insurance, partial loss of banks’ efficiency, mismatching of structures of assets and liabilities of the bank (resulting in GAP), as well as the size and structure of loans for the non‑financial sector. As a result of the conducted analysis, 6 indirect risks were identified, each for the assumed risk level: low, medium and high.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albinowski M. (2015), Koncepcje wąskiej bankowości (narrow banking) i ich krytyka, “Bank i Kredyt”, no. 46(5), pp. 463–486.
Google Scholar

Anginer D., Demirgüc‑Kunt A., Zhu M. (2013), How does deposit insurance affect bank risk? Evidence from the recent crisis, “Journal of Banking and Finance”, no. 48, pp. 312–321.
Google Scholar

Benes J., Kumhof M. (2012), The Chicago Plan Revisited, IMF Working Paper no. 12/202, pp. 1–71.
Google Scholar

Berger A., Herring R., Szegö G. (1995), The role of capital in financial institutions, “Journal of Banking and Finance”, no. 19, pp. 393–430.
Google Scholar

Bryan L. (1991), Core Banking, “McKinsey Quarterly”, no. 1, pp. 105–118.
Google Scholar

Carlson M. (2013), Lessons from the historical use of reserve requirements in the United States to promote bank liquidity, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, no. 11, The Federal Reserve Board, Washington.
Google Scholar

Cipiur J. (2014), Banki na jednej nodze, https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/tematyka/rynki-finansowe/banki-na-jednej-nodze/ [accessed: 12.11.2016].
Google Scholar

Cochrane J. H. (2014), Toward a run‑free financial system, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), University of Chicago – Booth School of Business, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Demirgüc‑Kunt A., Kane E., Laeven L. (2014), Deposit insurance database, Policy Research Working Paper no. 6934, World Bank, Washington.
Google Scholar

EBC Report for 2016 (2017), https://www.braincouncil.eu [accessed: 18.06.2017].
Google Scholar

Eurostat 2016 (2017), https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/eurostat-european-statistics_pl [accessed: 11.06.2017].
Google Scholar

Gorton G., Pennacchi G. (1990), Financial intermediaries and liquidity creation, “Journal of Finance”, no. 45(1), pp. 49–71.
Google Scholar

Gorton G., Pennacchi G. (1993), Money market funds and finance companies: Are they the banks of the future?, [in:] M. Klausner, L. White (eds.), Structural Change in Banking, Business One Irwin, Homewood.
Google Scholar

Kacperczyk M., Schnabl P. (2011), Implicit guarantees and risk taking inside financial institutions, Working Paper, New York University.
Google Scholar

Kay J. (2009), Narrow Banking: The Reform of Banking Regulation, CSFI, London.
Google Scholar

King R. (1983), On the economics of private money, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, no. 12, pp. 127–158.
Google Scholar

KNF Report 2016 (2017), https://www.knf.gov.pl [accessed: 5.06.2017].
Google Scholar

Kobayakawa S., Nakamura H. (2000), A Theoretical Analysis of Narrow Banking Proposals, “Monetary and Economic Studies”, pp. 105–118.
Google Scholar

Lambert C., Noth F., Schuwer U. (2013), How do insured deposits affect bank risk? Evidence from the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, Discussion Papers, DIW, no. 1347, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Lé M. (2013), Deposit insurance adoption and bank risk‑taking: the role of leverage, Working Paper, no. 2013, Paris School of Economics, Paris.
Google Scholar

Litan R. (1987), What should banks do?, The Brookings Institution, Washington.
Google Scholar

NBP Report for 2016 (2017), https://www.nbp.pl [accessed: 3.06.2017].
Google Scholar

OECD 2016 (2017), https://www.oecd.org [accessed: 15.06.2017].
Google Scholar

Pennacchi G. (2010), Deposit insurance reform. In Public Insurance and Private Markets, JR Brown, Washington.
Google Scholar

Pennacchi G. (2012), Narrow Banking, “ARFE: Annual Review of Financial Economics”, no. 4 pp. 1–14, https://business.illinois.edu [accessed: 16.11.2016].
Google Scholar

Percie J. (1991), The Future of Banking, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Google Scholar

Phillips R., Roselli A. (2011), How to avoid the next taxpayer bailout of the financial system: the narrow banking proposal, [in:] J. Tatom (ed.), Financial market regulation: legislation and implications, Springer Publishing, New York.
Google Scholar

Roberds W., Velde F. (2014), Early public banks, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, no. 03.
Google Scholar

Wagner W. (2010), Diversification at financial institutions and systemic crises, “Journal of Financial Intermediation”, no. 19(3), pp. 373–386.
Google Scholar

The World Bank Annual Report 2016 (2017), https://openknowledge.bankworld.org [accessed: 11.06.2017].
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2019-09-13

How to Cite

Pera, J. (2019). Narrow Banking from the Perspective of Risk. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 4(343), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.343.04

Issue

Section

Articles