The Macroeconomic Conditions of the Remuneration and Pension Dynamics in Poland (2010–2035)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.356.02Keywords:
employed person, pensioner, remuneration, pension, GDP, productivity, Intergenerational Income Transfer ModelAbstract
The aim of the article is to indicate the macroeconomic conditions which determined the dynamics of remuneration and pension growth in Poland in 2010–2019, along with presenting the study forecast until 2035. The research was based on the data from the national accounts, population statistics, statistics of retirement benefits, demographic forecast of Statistics Poland and forecast of retired population worked out by ZUS.
The demographic ageing of society leads to the growing problem of distribution of the current stream of goods and services produced in the economic process. The possibilities in this respect are determined by the relations between dynamics of the number of employed persons, number of pensioners and the volume of national income. The resulting dependencies can be described using the Intergenerational Income Transfer Model (IITM).
The observation of tendencies in Poland demonstrated that the pace of GDP growth between 2010–2019 ensured the macroeconomic balance essential in the process of shaping remunerations and pensions – GDP was growing faster than remunerations and pensions. The carried out estimates indicate the need to maintain a GDP growth rate and productivity at not less than 2% per annum, which means that the volume of GDP will need to increase by more than 12% in 2025 compared to 2019 (using IITM).
With the help of the IITM it was also possible to identify the main difficulty facing the public intergenerational transfers, which in a state perceived as a common good, should be understood as pensioners’ liabilities and their repayment should ensure a fair standard of living for the elderly.
Downloads
References
Anacka M., Janicka A. (2018), Prognoza ludności Polski na podstawie ekonometrycznej prognozy strumieni migracyjnych, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, nr 8(687), s. 5–27.
Google Scholar
Branson W. H. (1989), Macroeconomic. Theory and Policy, Harper & Row, New York.
Google Scholar
Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2020), Rocznik Statystyczny 2019, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Górny A. (2017), All circular but different. Variation in patterns of Ukraine-to-Poland Migration, „Population, Space and Place”, t. 23, nr 8, s. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2074
Google Scholar
Kurkiewicz J. (red.) (2007), Ludzie starsi w rodzinie i społeczeństwie, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Légaré J. (2006), Economic, Social, and Cultural Consequences of the Aging of the Population, [w:] G. Caselli, J. Vallin, G. Wunsch (red.), Demography: Analysis and synthesis, t. 3, Elsevier, London–New York–Tokyo, s. 327–336.
Google Scholar
Ochocki A. (2008), Intergenerational Income Transfer Model, „Statistics in Transition”, t. 9, nr 3, s. 561–570.
Google Scholar
Piketty T. (2015), Ekonomia nierówności, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Rosset E. (1967), Ludzie starzy. Studium demograficzne, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Sauvy A. (1963), Théorie générale de la population, t. I, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Google Scholar
Schoenmaeckers R. C., Vanderleyden L. (2005), Intergenerational Solidarity, the Elderly and Ageing: Main Results, „Studia Demograficzne”, nr 148, s. 100–113.
Google Scholar
Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (2016), Prognoza wpływów i wydatków funduszu emerytalnego do roku 2060, Warszawa.
Google Scholar