Zastosowanie analizy kladystycznej do rekonstrukcji filogenezy hominidów

Katarzyna A. Kaszycka

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.56.1-2.10

Authors

Katarzyna A. Kaszycka Instytut Antropologii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.56.1-2.10

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among eight hominid taxa (the Australopithecines and Homo) are examined using cladistic techniques. Data on morphological and morphometric characters of fossil hominid crania, mandibles and dentition were collected from the literature. Cladograms were constructed using the PAUP phylogeny program to find the best fitting (maximum parsimony) hypotheses. Two equally the most parsimonious cladograms were found. The genus Homo is confirmed to be monophyletic, while Australopithecus is not. Results of this analysis support a close phylogenetic relationship of A.africanus to both Homo and the "robust” Australopithecine clades. Even though the relationships of A.aethiopicus (WT17000) are ambiguous, the most parsimonious cladograms do not place this species as a sister taxon of both A.boisei and A.robustus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOAZ N.T., 1983, Morphological Trends and Phylogenetic Relationships from Middle Miocene Hominoids to Late Pliocene Hominoids, [w:] New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, R.L. Ciochon, R.S. Corruccini (Eds), Plenum Publ. Corpor., New York, 705-720
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8854-8_28

BOROWIEC L., 1989, Teoria i praktyka taksonomii kladystycznej, Przegl. Zool., 33, 531-536
View in Google Scholar

Chamberlain A.T., BA. Wood, 1987, Early hominid phytogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 16, 119-133
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(87)90063-7

DELSON E., 1986, Human phytogeny revised again, Nature, 322, 496-497
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322496b0

FARRIS J.S., 1989, Entropy and fruit flies, Cladistics, 5, 103-108
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00573.x

FARRIS J.S., A.G. KLUGE, 1985, Parsimony, synapomorphy, and explanatory power: a reply to Duncan, Taxon, 34, 130-135
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1221577

HENNIG W., 1965, Phylogenetic systematics, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 10, 97-116
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525

HENNIG W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana
View in Google Scholar

JOHANSON D.C., 1989, The current status of Australopithecus, [w:] Hominoidea. Proceeding of the 2nd International Congress of Human Paleontology, Milan, 77-96
View in Google Scholar

KIMBEL W.H., T.D. WHITE, D.C. JOHANSON, 1988, Implications of KNM-WT 17 000 for the Evolution of „robust" Australopithecus, [w:] Evolutionary History of the „Robust" Australopithecines, F. E. Grine (Ed.), Aldine, Chicago, 259-268
View in Google Scholar

MADDISON W.P., M.J. DONOGHUE, D.R. MADDISON, 1984, Outgroup analysis and parsimony, Syst. Zool., 33, 83-103
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/33.1.83

MATILE L., P. TASSY, D. GOUJET, 1993, Wstęp do systematyki zoologicznej, Warszawa
View in Google Scholar

Skelton R.R., H. McHenry, G.M. Drawhorn, 1986, Phylogenetic analysis of early hominids, Curr. Anthrop., 27, 21-43
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/203377

SWOFFORD D.L., 1990, PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 3.0, May 1990, Illinois. Nat. Hist. Surv., Champaign
View in Google Scholar

TOBIAS P.V., 1980, „Australopithecus afarensis" and A. africanus: critique and an alternative hypothesis, Palaeont. Afr. 23, 1-17
View in Google Scholar

TOBIAS P.V., 1988, Numerous apparently synapomorphic features in Australopithecus robustus, Austaralopithecus boisei and Homo habilis: support for the Skeleton- McHenry-Drawhom hypothesis, [w:] Evolutionary History of the „Robust" Australopithecines, F.E. Grine ed., Aldine, Chicago, 293-308
View in Google Scholar

WALKER A., R.E. LEAKEY, J. M. HARRIS, F.H. BROWN, 1986, 2.5-Myr Australopithecus boisei from west of Lake Turkana, Kenya, Nature, 322, 517-522
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322517a0

WHITE T.D., D.C. JOHANSON, W.H. KIMBEL, 1981, Australopithecus africanus: its phyletic position reconsidered, South Afr. J. Sci., 77, 445-470
View in Google Scholar

WILEY E.O., 1981, Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York
View in Google Scholar

WILEY E.O., D. SIEGEL-CAUSEY, D.R. BROOKS, V.A. FUNK, 1991, The Compleat Cladist: A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4069

WOOD B.A., A.T. CHAMBERLAIN, 1986, Australopithecus: grade or clade?, [w:] Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, B. Wood, L. Martin, P. Andrews (Eds), Cambridge, Univ. Press, 220-248
View in Google Scholar

WOOD B.A., A.T. CHAMBERLAIN, 1987, The nature and affinities of the "robust" Australopithecines: a review, J. Hum. Evol., 16, 625-641
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(87)90017-0