Phylogenetic systematics perspective and problems with ancestral species – theoretical considerations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.62.08Abstract
The paper summarizes the main assumptions and procedures of phylogenetic systematics (cladistics), and presents problems with identifying common ancestral species from this perspective.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA M. T., F. A. BISBY, 1984, A simple method for establishing taxonomic characters from measurement data, Taxon, 33, 405-409
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1996-8175.1984.tb03894.x
ARCHIE J. W., 1985, Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis, Syst. Zool., 34, 326-345
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/34.3.326
BAUM B. R., 1988, A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data applicable to cladistics, Taxon, 37, 63-70
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1220934
BELL M. A., 1979, Persistence of ancestral sister-species, Syst. Zool., 28, 85-88
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/28.1.85
BOCK W. J., 1973, Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification, Syst. Zool., 22, 375-392
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412945
BRETSKY S.S., 1975, Allopatry and ancestors: A response to Cracraft, Syst. Zool., 24, 113-119
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/24.1.113
CHAMBERLAIN A. T., B. A. WOOD, 1987, Early hominid phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 16, 119-133
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(87)90063-7
CHAPPILL J. A., 1989, Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis, Cladistics, 5, 217-234
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00487.x
CRACRAFT J., 1974, Phylogenetic models and classification, Syst. Zool., 23, 71-90
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/23.1.71
DELSON E., 1977, Catarrhine phylogeny and classification: Principles, methods and comments, J. Hum. Evol., 6, 433-459
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80057-2
ELDREDGE N., S. J. GOULD, 1972, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, [in:] T. J. M. Schopf ed., “Models in Paleontology”, Freeman, Cooper & Co., San Francisco, 82-115
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5531/sd.paleo.7
ENGELMANN G. F., E. O. WILEY, 1977, The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction, Syst. Zool., 26, 1-11
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/26.1.1
FARRIS J. S., 1976, Phylogenetic classification of fossils with recent species, Syst. Zool., 25, 271-282
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412495
FARRIS J. S., 1983, The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis, [in:] N. I. Platnik & V. A. Funk eds., „Advances in Cladistics”, Vol. 2, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 7-36
View in Google Scholar
FARRIS J. S., A. G. KLUGE, 1985, Parsimony, synapomorphy, and explanatory power: A reply to Duncan, Taxon, 34, 130-135
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1221577
FINK W. L., 1986, Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis, Science, 234, 1135-1139
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.234.4780.1135
GINGERICH P. D., M. J. SCHOENINGER, 1977, The fossil record and primate phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 6, 483-505
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80059-6
HARRISON T., 1993, Cladistic concepts and the species problem in hominoid evolution, [in:] W.H. Kimbel & L.B. Martin eds., „Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution”, Plenum Press, New York, 345-371
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_14
HENNIG W., 1965, Phylogenetic systematics, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 10, 97-116
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525
HENNIG W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana
View in Google Scholar
HULL D. L., 1978, A matter of individuality, Philosophy of Science, 45, 335-360
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/288811
HULL D. L., 1979, The limits of cladism, Syst. Zool., 28, 416-440
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/sysbio/28.4.416
KLUGE A. G., 1992, Principles of Systematics. Biology 491 course-pack, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
View in Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN D. E., 1995, Testing hypotheses about recent human evolution from skulls, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 159-197
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204348
MADDISON W. P., M. J. DONOGHUE, D. R. MADDISON, 1984, Outgroup analysis and parsimony, Syst. Zool., 33, 83-103
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/33.1.83
MAYR E., 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865327
MICKEVICH M. F., M. F. JOHNSON, 1976, Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution, Syst. Zool., 25, 260-270
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412494
NELSON G., 1972, Comments on Hennig’s “phylogenetic systematics” and its influence on ichthyology, Syst. Zool., 21, 364-374
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/21.4.364
NELSON G., 1973, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships, Syst. Zool., 22, 344-359
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412943
NELSON G., N. I. PLATNIK, 1981, Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar
PIMENTEL R. A., R. RIGGINS, 1987, The nature of cladistic data, Cladistics, 3, 201-209
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00508.x
PLATNICK N. I., 1977, Cladograms, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing, Syst. Zool., 26, 438-442
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/26.4.438
POPPER K. R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577
SIMPSON G. G., 1953, The Major Features of Evolution, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/simp93764
SNEATH P. H. A., R. R. SOKAL, 1973, Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
View in Google Scholar
SOKAL R. R., P. H. A. SNEATH, 1963, The Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1217562
TATTERSALL I., N. ELDREDGE, 1977, Fact, theory, and fantasy in human paleontology, Am. Sci., 65, 204-211
View in Google Scholar
TRINKAUS E., 1995, Comment, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 185-186
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.185
WATROUS L. E., Q. D. WHEELER, 1981, The outgroup comparison method of character analysis, Syst. Zool., 30, 1-11
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/30.1.1
WILEY E. O., 1978, The evolutionary species reconsidered, Syst. Zool., 27, 17-26
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412809
WILEY E. O., 1981, Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York
View in Google Scholar
WILEY E. O., D. SIEGEL-CAUSEY, D. R. BROOKS, V. A. FUNK, 1991, The Compleat Cladist: A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4069
WOLPOFF M. H., T. L. CRUMMETT, 1995, Comment, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 186-188
View in Google Scholar
WOOD B. A., 1991, Koobi Fora Research Project, Volume 4. Hominid cranial remains, Clarendon Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.