Phylogenetic systematics perspective and problems with ancestral species – theoretical considerations

Authors

  • Katarzyna A. Kaszycka Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Anthropology, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.62.08

Abstract

The paper summarizes the main assumptions and procedures of phylogenetic systematics (cladistics), and presents problems with identifying common ancestral species from this perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMEIDA M. T., F. A. BISBY, 1984, A simple method for establishing taxonomic characters from measurement data, Taxon, 33, 405-409
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1996-8175.1984.tb03894.x

ARCHIE J. W., 1985, Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis, Syst. Zool., 34, 326-345
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/34.3.326

BAUM B. R., 1988, A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data applicable to cladistics, Taxon, 37, 63-70
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1220934

BELL M. A., 1979, Persistence of ancestral sister-species, Syst. Zool., 28, 85-88
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/28.1.85

BOCK W. J., 1973, Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification, Syst. Zool., 22, 375-392
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412945

BRETSKY S.S., 1975, Allopatry and ancestors: A response to Cracraft, Syst. Zool., 24, 113-119
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/24.1.113

CHAMBERLAIN A. T., B. A. WOOD, 1987, Early hominid phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 16, 119-133
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(87)90063-7

CHAPPILL J. A., 1989, Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis, Cladistics, 5, 217-234
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00487.x

CRACRAFT J., 1974, Phylogenetic models and classification, Syst. Zool., 23, 71-90
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/23.1.71

DELSON E., 1977, Catarrhine phylogeny and classification: Principles, methods and comments, J. Hum. Evol., 6, 433-459
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80057-2

ELDREDGE N., S. J. GOULD, 1972, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, [in:] T. J. M. Schopf ed., “Models in Paleontology”, Freeman, Cooper & Co., San Francisco, 82-115
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5531/sd.paleo.7

ENGELMANN G. F., E. O. WILEY, 1977, The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction, Syst. Zool., 26, 1-11
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/26.1.1

FARRIS J. S., 1976, Phylogenetic classification of fossils with recent species, Syst. Zool., 25, 271-282
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412495

FARRIS J. S., 1983, The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis, [in:] N. I. Platnik & V. A. Funk eds., „Advances in Cladistics”, Vol. 2, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 7-36
View in Google Scholar

FARRIS J. S., A. G. KLUGE, 1985, Parsimony, synapomorphy, and explanatory power: A reply to Duncan, Taxon, 34, 130-135
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1221577

FINK W. L., 1986, Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis, Science, 234, 1135-1139
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.234.4780.1135

GINGERICH P. D., M. J. SCHOENINGER, 1977, The fossil record and primate phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 6, 483-505
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80059-6

HARRISON T., 1993, Cladistic concepts and the species problem in hominoid evolution, [in:] W.H. Kimbel & L.B. Martin eds., „Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution”, Plenum Press, New York, 345-371
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_14

HENNIG W., 1965, Phylogenetic systematics, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 10, 97-116
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525

HENNIG W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana
View in Google Scholar

HULL D. L., 1978, A matter of individuality, Philosophy of Science, 45, 335-360
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/288811

HULL D. L., 1979, The limits of cladism, Syst. Zool., 28, 416-440
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/sysbio/28.4.416

KLUGE A. G., 1992, Principles of Systematics. Biology 491 course-pack, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
View in Google Scholar

LIEBERMAN D. E., 1995, Testing hypotheses about recent human evolution from skulls, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 159-197
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204348

MADDISON W. P., M. J. DONOGHUE, D. R. MADDISON, 1984, Outgroup analysis and parsimony, Syst. Zool., 33, 83-103
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/33.1.83

MAYR E., 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865327

MICKEVICH M. F., M. F. JOHNSON, 1976, Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution, Syst. Zool., 25, 260-270
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412494

NELSON G., 1972, Comments on Hennig’s “phylogenetic systematics” and its influence on ichthyology, Syst. Zool., 21, 364-374
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/21.4.364

NELSON G., 1973, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships, Syst. Zool., 22, 344-359
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412943

NELSON G., N. I. PLATNIK, 1981, Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar

PIMENTEL R. A., R. RIGGINS, 1987, The nature of cladistic data, Cladistics, 3, 201-209
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00508.x

PLATNICK N. I., 1977, Cladograms, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing, Syst. Zool., 26, 438-442
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/26.4.438

POPPER K. R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577

SIMPSON G. G., 1953, The Major Features of Evolution, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/simp93764

SNEATH P. H. A., R. R. SOKAL, 1973, Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
View in Google Scholar

SOKAL R. R., P. H. A. SNEATH, 1963, The Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1217562

TATTERSALL I., N. ELDREDGE, 1977, Fact, theory, and fantasy in human paleontology, Am. Sci., 65, 204-211
View in Google Scholar

TRINKAUS E., 1995, Comment, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 185-186
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.185

WATROUS L. E., Q. D. WHEELER, 1981, The outgroup comparison method of character analysis, Syst. Zool., 30, 1-11
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/30.1.1

WILEY E. O., 1978, The evolutionary species reconsidered, Syst. Zool., 27, 17-26
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2412809

WILEY E. O., 1981, Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York
View in Google Scholar

WILEY E. O., D. SIEGEL-CAUSEY, D. R. BROOKS, V. A. FUNK, 1991, The Compleat Cladist: A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4069

WOLPOFF M. H., T. L. CRUMMETT, 1995, Comment, Curr. Anthrop., 36, 186-188
View in Google Scholar

WOOD B. A., 1991, Koobi Fora Research Project, Volume 4. Hominid cranial remains, Clarendon Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

1999-12-30

How to Cite

Kaszycka, K. A. (1999). Phylogenetic systematics perspective and problems with ancestral species – theoretical considerations. Anthropological Review, 62, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.62.08

Issue

Section

Articles