Ademia: Agamben and the Idea of the People

Gian Giacomo Fusco

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.89.07

Authors

Gian Giacomo Fusco University of Kent; Uczelnia Łazarskiego https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6977-2832

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.89.07

Keywords:

Agamben, Ademia, People, Multitude, Rousseau, Schmitt

Abstract

In the volume Stasis. Civil War as a Political Paradigm, the Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben advances the thesis that ademia – the absence of a people (a-demos) – is a constitutive element of the modern state. When confronted with the fact that modern political and juridical thought elevated the people to the role of the sole chief constituent agent and the ultimate source of the legitimacy of constituted orders, this thesis turns out to be rather problematic. In this work, I will explore Agamben’s notion of ademia, retracing the main lines of its theoretical development and reconsidering it in relation to different interpretations of the idea of the people. Most notably, I will demonstrate how Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Carl Schmitt in challenging the conundrums that the idea of the people inevitably entails ended up in revealing the ultimate absence of the people in the political space of the constituted order of the state. In doing so, I will try to show how Agamben’s notion of ademia is helpful is grasping some of the main paradoxes and conundrums underpinning the meaning and the uses of the idea of the people in legal and political thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Translated by Cesare Casarino, Vincenzo Binetti. Minneapolis–London: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Translated by Patricia Dailey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.
Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. 2015. Stasis. Civil War as a Political Paradigm. Translated by Nicolas Heron. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 2007. “Rousseau: The Social Contract”. In Politics and History. 128–129. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso.
Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain. 2016. “Twenty-Four Notes on the Uses of the Word ‘People’”. In What Is a People? 21–31. Edited by Alain Badiou, Pierre Bourdieu, Judith Butler, Georges Didi-Huberman, Sadri Khiari, Jacques Rancière. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Canivez, Patrice. 2004. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Concept of People”. Philosophy & Social Criticism 30(4): 393–412.
Google Scholar

Cassin, Barbara. 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables. A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Durantaye de la, Leland. 2009. Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Falk, Francesca. 2011. Eine gestische Geschichte der Grenzen: wie der Liberalismus an der Grenze an seine Grenze kommt. Munich: Fink.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France 1997–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael. Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1983. De Cive. Latin Version. Edited by Howard Warrender. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Jellinek, Georg. 1914. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Häring
Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. Ernesto Laclau. 1986. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1999. Insurgencies. Constituent Power and the Modern State. Translated by Maurizia Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Piasentier, Marco. Davide Tarizzo. 2016. “‘The Government of a Multitude’: Hobbes on Political Subjectification”. In The Routledge Handbook to Biopolitics. Prozorov. 36–49. Edited by Simona Rentea, Sergei Prozorov. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Possenti, Vittorio. 1988. “Sul concetto di popolo: momenti della filosofia pubblica antica e moderna”. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 80(3): 395–423.
Google Scholar

Rash, William. 2014. “Carl Schmitt’s Defence of Democracy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt. Edited by Jens Meierhenrich, Oliver Simons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2002. The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses. Edited by Susan Dunn. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology. Four Chapter on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Constitutional Theory. Translation by Jeffery Seitzer. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 2014. Dictatorship. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. 2003. Political Writings: Including the Debate Between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791. Indianapolis: Hackett Classics.
Google Scholar

Virno, Paolo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. New York: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar