Trust and Distrust in a Democratic State of Law

Marta Krasoń; Robert Krasoń

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.109.04

Authors

Marta Krasoń University of Lodz, Faculty of Law and Administration https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3919-8371
Robert Krasoń University of Lodz, Faculty of Law and Administration, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-5019

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.109.04

Keywords:

trust, law, state, society, power

Abstract

The issue of trust in law and trust of the governed in those who govern them has accompanied mankind since the early history. Trust is one of the most prominent values for maintaining cohesion of social groups and, more broadly, whole societies. People had to first have trust in themselves in order to trust the law and the state and, eventually, to have the state to trust them. The matter of trust in law remains highly up-to-date and should be considered in connection with the trust in the lawmakers, the legal acts created by them, but also trust in law exhibited by the relevant institutions and bodies. Trust is a temporal state; we can enjoy it either permanently or periodically, therefore, the institutions and principles laid down by the law are an indispensable aspect that guarantees permanence of trust. The key task of public administration, aimed at inspiring and intensifying trust, is to obtain and secure the common good in the state on the basis of, and within the limits of, the applicable legal regulations, which at the same time set out the methods and scope of social protection in the individual spheres of operation of the legislative, executive, and judicial authorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. 1996. Dzieła wszystkie. [Collection of All Works]. 306. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Bugdol, Marek. 2010. “Zaufanie jako element system wartości organizacyjnych.” [Trust as Part of an Organisational System of Values]. Współczesne Zarządzanie 2: 11–25.
Google Scholar

Centre for Public Opinion Research (CBOS). 2012. Zaufanie społeczne. [Social Trust]. BS/33/2012.Warszawa, https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2012/K_033_12.PDF.
Google Scholar

Chojnicka, Krystyna. Henryk Olszewski. 2004. “Liberalizm polityczny: Locke.” [Political Liberalism: Locke]. In Historia doktryn politycznych i prawnych. Podręcznik akademicki. [History of Political and Legal Doctrines. Academic Handbook]. Edited by Danuta Wesołowska, Jacek Wiewiórka. 111. Poznań: Ars boni et aequi.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. “Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.” Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Gil, Damian. 2012. “Wyłączenie sędziego związanego uprzednio wydanym orzeczeniem w procesie karnym.” [Exclusion of a Judge Bound by a Previous Judgment in a Criminal Trial]. In Dyskrecjonalna władza sędziego. Zagadnienia teorii i praktyki. [Discretionary Power of Judges: Matters of Theory and Practice]. Edited by Marcin Dębiński, Robert Pelewicz, Tomasz Rakoczy. 45–54. Tarnobrzeg: Sąd Okręgowy w Tarnobrzegu.
Google Scholar

Graff, Grzegorz. 2001. “Czy istnieje cnota zaufania?” [Is There a Virtue of Trust?]. Przegląd Powszechny 12: 309–316.
Google Scholar

Graff, Grzegorz. 2003. “Etyczne aspekty zaufania.” [Ethical Aspects of Trust]. Prakseologia 143: 99–107.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. “Klasyczna nauka o polityce a filozofia społeczna.” [Classical Political Science and Social Philosophy]. In Teoria i praktyka: Wybór pism [Theory and Practice: A Selection of Works]. Translated by Małgorzata Łukasiewicz. Selected by Zbigniew Krasnodębski. 90. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. 2003. “Street-Level Epistemology and Democratic Participation.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy. Edited by James S. Fishkin, Peter Laslett. 163–181. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.ch8.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.ch8

Hardin, Russell. 2006. Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan, Or, The Matter, Form, and Power of a Common-Wealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil. Printed for Andrew Crooke: England.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.59773.39088001833995

Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Jakubowski, Jerzy. 1965. “Pojęcia obowiązywania, realizacji i skuteczności normy prawnej oraz podstawy ich rozróżnienia.” [The Concepts of Validity, Implementation and Effectiveness of a Legal Norm and the Grounds for their Distinction]. In Studia z teorii prawa. [Studies in Legal Theory]. 318, 320. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Jasiński, Wojciech. 2009. Bezstronność sądu i jej gwarancje w polskim procesie karnym. [Impartiality of the Court and Its Guarantees in the Polish Criminal Process]. 85, 487. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Kramer, Roderick. 2008. “Paranoja zbiorowa: nieufność między grupami społecznymi.” [Collective Paranoia: Distrust Between Social Groups]. In Socjologia codzienności. [Sociology of Everyday Life]. Edited by Piotr Sztompka, Małgorzata Bogunia-Borowska. 250. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Kunysz, Justyna. 2014. “Skuteczność prawa (zagadnienia wybrane).” [Effectiveness of Law (Selected Issues)]. Administracja: Teoria, Dydaktyka, Praktyka 2(35): 67–93.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1978. “Soziologie der Moral.” [Sociology of Morality]. In Theorie, Technik und Moral. Edited by Stephan Pfürtner. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar

Parry, Geraint. 1976. “Trust, Distrust and Consensus.” British Journal of Political Science 6(2): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000594
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000594

Piłat, Robert. 2022.“O zaufaniu.” [On Trust]. Culture, https://culture.pl/pl/artykul/o-zaufaniu.
Google Scholar

Rau, Zdzisław. 1992. “Wstęp.” In Dwa traktaty o rządzie. John Locke. [Introduction to Two Treatises of Government by John Locke]. 59. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 1975. “Socjologia.” [Sociology]. 396. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Szczepański, Jakub. 2021. “Pokój i wojna. O stanie natury według Johna Locke’a i Thomasa Hobbesa” [Peace and War. On the State of Nature According to John Locke and Thomas Hobbes]. Studia Polityczne 49(3): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2021.49.3.03
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2021.49.3.03

Sztompka, Piotr. 2007. Zaufanie: Fundament społeczeństwa. [Trust: The Foundation of a Society]. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Tuleja, Piotr. 2016. “Komentarz do art. 2” [Comments on Article 2]. In Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. [The Constitution of the Republic of Poland]. Komentarz do art. 1–86. [Comments to Articles 1–86]. Edited by Marek Safjan, Leszek Bosek. Warszawa: Legalis/el.
Google Scholar

Wojciechowski, Bartosz. 2004. Dyskrecjonalność sędziowska: Studium teoretycznoprawne. [Judicial Discretion: A Theoretical and Legal Study]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo UMK.
Google Scholar

Ziembiński, Zygmunt. 1980. Problemy podstawowe prawoznawstwa. [Fundamental Problems of Jurisprudence]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Zubik, Marek. Wojciech Sokolewicz. 2016. “Komentarz do art. 2” [Comments on Article 2]. In Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. [The Constitution of the Republic of Poland]. Komentarz do art. 1–86. [Comments to Articles 1–86]. Edited by Leszek Garlicki, Marek Zubik. Warszawa: LEX/el
Google Scholar

The Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (official journal “Dz.U.” of 1997, 78, item 483).
Google Scholar

The Act of 10 September 1999 – The Fiscal Penal Code (official journal “Dz.U.” of 2024, item 628, 850).
Google Scholar