A Commentary on Kant’s Introduction of the Concept of Transcendental Deduction

Jan Woleński

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.100.02

Authors

Jan Woleński University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Department of Social Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-7839

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.100.02

Keywords:

'quid facti', 'quid juris', logic, deduction, obligation, validity, knowledge

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the place of legal analogy in Kant’s introduction of the concept of transcendental deduction. After remarks on Kant’s use of the term “deduction,” transcendental deduction is characterised as the method justifying necessary statements about objects. It is argued that this method has normative elements. This leads to asserting similarities between epistemic obligation and legal obligation in the framework of transcendental philosophy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1937. “Problemat transcendentalnego idealizmu w sformułowaniu semantycznym.” [A Semantical Version of the Problem of Transcendental Idealizm]. Przegląd Filozoficzny 41: 271–287.
Google Scholar

Allison, Henry J. 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduktion. An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724858.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724858.001.0001

Baum, Manfred. 1986. Deduktion und Beweis in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie. Untersuchungen zur “Kritik der reinen Vernuft.” Königstein: Hain Verlag bei Athenäum.
Google Scholar

Caygill, Howard. 1995. A Kant Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631175353.1995.00021.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631175353.1995.x

Cohen, Hermann. 1907. Kommentar zu Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernuft. Leipzig: Meiner.
Google Scholar

Eisler, Rudolf. 1901. Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffen. Berlin: Mittler und Sohn.
Google Scholar

Eisler, Rudolf. 1925. Erkenntnistheorie. Leipzig: Barth.
Google Scholar

Eisler, Rudolf. 1930. Kant-Lexikon. Nachschlagewerk zu Kants sämtlichen Schriften/Briefen und handschriflichem Nachlass. Hamburg: Mittler und Sohn.
Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. 1999. Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Heinrich, Dieter. 1989. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique.” In Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum. Edited by Eckarht Förster. 29–46. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621619-006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621619-006

Howell, Robert. 1992. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. An Analysis of Main Themes in His Critical Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman. 2021. Lwowskie wykłady o Krytycyzmie Kanta z roku akademickiego 1935/1936. [Lwow Lectures on Kant’s Criticism from the Academic Year 1935/1936]. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.
Google Scholar

Kant. Immanuel. 1926. Kritik der reinen Vernuft. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1933. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N.K. Smith. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Kemp Smith, Norman. 1918. A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason.” London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Krug, Wilhelm Traugott. 1832. Allgemeines Handwörterbuch der philosophischen Wissenschaften nebst ihrer Literatur und Geschichte. Erster Band. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
Google Scholar

Lewis, Charlton T. 1879. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Messer, August. 1922. Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernuft. Stuffgart: Strecker und Schöder. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-1923-0144
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-1923-0144

Paton, Herbert J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysics of Experience. A Commentary on the First Half of the Kritik der reinen Vernuft. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Google Scholar

Rickert, Heinrich. 1892. Gegenstand der Erkenntnis: Einführung in Die Transzendentalphilosophie. Freiburg: J.C.B. Mohr.
Google Scholar

Ritter, Joachim. Herausgeber. 1972. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenchafliche Buchgesselschaft.
Google Scholar

Sondel, Janusz. 1997. Słownik łacińsko-polski dla prawników i historyków. [Latin-Polish Dictionary for Lawyers and Historians]. Kraków: Universitas.
Google Scholar

Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Rainer. 1991. “Transcendental”. In Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Edited by Hans Burkhardt and Barry Smith. 906–909. Münich: Philosophia Verlag.
Google Scholar

Swing, Thomas. 1969. Kant’s Transcendental Logic. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar