War-torn King Lear: Adaptation as Catharsis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.31.20Słowa kluczowe:
adaptation, bibliotherapy, catharsis, King Lear, UkraineAbstrakt
Ukrainian director Vyacheslav Yehorov staged King Lear around war-torn Ukraine, and then in 2024 toured this Ukrainian King Lear to Stratford-upon-Avon (Royal Shakespeare Company; see Christie Carson’s article in this volume). Yehorov and Dmytro Hreshko collaborated in producing a film documenting the challenges and experiences of staging King Lear in such a context: ‘King Lear’: How We Looked for Love during the War. This paper examines the significance of King Lear as a refuge for Ukrainian communities grappling with the ravages of war, and explores how Yehorov and Hreshko’s adaptation serves as a source of catharsis. At the heart of King Lear lies the theme of seeking shelter, a resonant motif for communities impacted by war. The characters’ struggles for refuge mirror the plight of Ukrainian refugees displaced from their homes. The parallels extend further as Lear’s fragmented Britain symbolically reflects the fractured state of Ukraine, pervaded by loss and destitution. The paper traces Lear’s evolution from an isolated victim to a figure who discovers solace in human connections, mirroring the journey of many Ukrainians enduring hardship, as it is depicted in the film. By examining testimonies from the ad-hoc Ukrainian actors involved in Hreshko and Yehorov’s film alongside Lear’s development, the study seeks to shed light on how King Lear acquires healing powers for communities in distress, offering a portrayal of collective destitution and emphasizing the importance of solidarity, empathy, and love in adversity. Ultimately, Yehorov and Hreshko’s initiative is interpreted as a form of bibliotherapy on stage, harnessing the therapeutic potential of theatre to provide solace during tumultuous times. Through their adaptation of King Lear, the two Ukrainian artists offer Ukrainian audiences a narrative that reflects their experiences and fosters a sense of communal resilience, showcasing the enduring power of Shakespeare’s plays to heal and unite even in the darkest of times.
Bibliografia
Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. M. Heath. London: Penguin Books, 1996.
Blatner, Adam. “Foreword.” Renée Emunah. Acting For Real: Drama Therapy Process, Technique, and Performance. New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers, 1994. ix–x.
Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative and History. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.20656
Chemers, Michael M. and Mike Sell. “From Systemic Dramaturgy to Systemic Pedagogy: Rethinking Theatre History and Technology.” Teaching Critical Performance Theory. Ed. Jeanmarie Higgins. London and New York: Routledge, 2020. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809966-6
Collier, Arlen. “King Lear and the Patterns of Romance.” Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 30.1 (1976): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1976.a458736
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism. Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.
Hreshko, Dmytro, dir. King Lear: How We Looked for Love During the War. Chicken Kyiv Films, 2023. Takflix, https://takflix.com/en/films/kinglear. Accessed 29 August 2025.
Jennings, Sue. “Introduction 1. ‘Reason in madness’: Therapeutic Journeys Through King Lear.” Dramatherapy: Theory and Practice 2. Ed. Sue Jennings. New York: Routledge, 1992. 5–18.
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies. A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880782
Kingsley-Smith, Jane Elizabeth. Banishment in Shakespeare’s Plays. Doctoral thesis. University of Birmingham, 1999.
Kirsch, Arthur. “The Emotional Landscape of King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39.2 (1988): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870627
Landy, Robert. “One-on-one: The Role of the Dramatherapist Working with Individuals.” Dramatherapy: Theory and practice 2. Ed. Sue Jennings. London and New York: Tavistock / Routledge, 1992. 97–111.
Mack, Maynard. King Lear in Our Time. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
Miller, Jesse. “Medicines of the Soul: Reparative Reading and the History of Bibliotherapy.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 51.2 (2018): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2018.0015
Pederson, Joshua. “Speak, Trauma: Toward a Revised Understanding of Literary Trauma Theory.” Narrative 22.3 (2014): 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2014.0018
Ribner, Irving. “The Gods Are Just: A Reading of King Lear.” The Tulane Drama Review 2.3 (1958): 34–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1124951
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. R. A. Foakes. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 1997.
Storozynsky, L. M. “King Lear and Chaos.” Critical Survey 3.2 (1991): 163–169.
Sturm, Brian W. “Reader’s Advisory and Bibliotherapy: Helping or Healing?” Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 41.2 (2003): 171–180.
Taylor, Gary. “The War in King Lear.” Ed. K. Muir. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123249X.003
“Ukrainian King Lear offers hope in face of conflict.” Royal Shakespeare Company. n.d. https://www.rsc.org.uk/king-lear/past-productions/ukrainian-king-lear-offers-hope-in-face-of-conflict. Accessed 29 August 2025.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.


