Exploring the Visual and Performative Appropriation of Shakespeare in Pakistani Theatres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.29.12Keywords:
Hamlet, Richard III, sign and symbols, Pakistani Theatre, NAPA, AestheticsAbstract
This research paper examines the experimental nature of appropriation focusing on The National Academy of Performing Arts (NAPA) renditions of Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1603) and Richard III (1597). It investigates how these adaptations bring about changes in both dramatic structure and artistic expression, dissecting visual and performative elements to uncover diverse meanings within live performances. The research delves into how NAPA’s creative choices offer new ways to examine Shakespeare’s universal themes—jealousy, incest, ambition, and hatred— through unconventional theatrical presentations, viewed from a post-dramatic perspective. Using Hans Thies Lehmann’s Post-dramatic theory (1960), it analyses alterations dramaturgical and aesthetical presentation such as plot construction, sign and symbol presentations. By bridging the gap between the art world and stagecraft, this study aims to deepen our understanding of how appropriation, aesthetics, and performance intersect. It also explores how these adaptations contribute to the global presentation of Shakespearean plays, offering insights from Pakistan’s theatrical landscape.
Downloads
References
Atay Citron, Sharon Aronson-Lehavi, David Zerbib (eds.). Performance Studies in Motion: International Perspectives and Practices in the Twenty-First Century. New York, London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 25 October 2020. ISBN: 9781408183168.
Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. The Empty Space. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
Google Scholar
Bulman, James C. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance. London: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687169.001.0001.
Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. “Postdramatic Theatre and Postdramatic Performance.” Brazilian Journal of Presence Studies 5.3 (Sept./Dec. 2015): 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-266053731.
Google Scholar
Crossley, Tracy. “Active Experiencing in Postdramatic: Affective Memory and Quarantine Theatre’s Wallflower.” University of Toledo Subject to the Cambridge (2018): 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X18000052.
Google Scholar
Dahn, Luke. Aleatory Quiz. 22 April 2014. https://lukedahn.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/aleatory-quiz/. Accessed 13 June 2022.
Google Scholar
Edwards, Mary D. (ed.). Doppelgangers, Alter Egos and Mirror Images. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2012.
Google Scholar
Fagles, Robert (trans.). Sophocles: Oedipus Rex. New York: Viking Penguin, 1984.
Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. Routledge Introduction to Theatre and Performance Studies. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
Google Scholar
Folger Shakespeare Library. Richard III. n.d. https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/richard-iii/read/5/4/. Accessed 2 July 2021.
Google Scholar
Gemmel, Mallory. “Art Theory: Appropriation.” 2021. Arts Help. https://www.artshelp.net/art-theory-appropriation/. Accessed 11 March 2022.
Google Scholar
Gough, Carl, Lavery, Richard. “Performance Research.” A Journal of the Performing Arts (2015): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2015.1049031.
Google Scholar
Gupta, Kavita. “Performing and Watching in the Same Space: A Study of National Academy of Performing Arts’ Production of Hamlet.” Invention 3.8. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (2014): 61-68.
Google Scholar
Hinda, Carolyn. “Re-Presenting Realities: The Semiotics of Postdramatic Theatre.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71.1 (2013): 45-54.
Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. The Theory of Adaptation. Great Britain: Routledge, 2006. Taylor and Francis Publishers.
Google Scholar
Kumar, Anil. “Hamlet Reversed Roles: A New Experiment in Theatre.” Journal of Literature, Languages, and Linguistics (2014): 43-46.
Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. Postdramatic Theatre. Translated by Karen Jurs-Munby. New York and Canada: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2006. Print.
Google Scholar
Mandiberg, Michael. “Creative Appropriation: The Smallest Move Is Often the Hardest.” 29 October 2014. https://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2014/10/29/creative-appropriation-the-smallest-move-is-often-the-hardest/. Accessed 1 October 2023.
Google Scholar
Martin, Lesley. University of Chicago, Theories of Media. 2003. https://csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/aesthetics.htm. Accessed 12 June 2021.
Google Scholar
NAPA. n.d. https://www.napa.org.pk. Accessed 12 June 2022.
Google Scholar
Opera 101. n.d. https://www.atlantaopera.org/opera101/. Accessed 23 December 2023.
Google Scholar
Power, Cormac. Presence in Play: A Critique of Theories of Presence in the Theatre. Amsterdam, New York, NY: Rodopi, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. Performance Theory. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. London: Penguin, 1998. Print.
Google Scholar
Ventzislavov, Rossen. The Aesthetics of Performance Art. n.d. https://cdn.ymaws.com/aesthetics-online.org/resource/resmgr/files/diversity/Ventzislavov_Performance_Art.pdf/. Accessed 2 July 2022.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
