The Fourth Crusade and Its Consequences for the Medieval Bulgaria: Kaloyan, the Latins and the Greeks (1204–1207)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.02Abstract
The analysis of the Bulgarian-Latin relations between 1204 and 1207, i.e. in the second half of Tsar Kaloyan’s reign, leads to conclusions as follows: 1. the Bulgarian monarch played a major role in forcing the newly-created Latin empire to adopt a defensive policy in the political struggles in the Balkan Peninsula; 2. thus, the Tsar contributed to retaining and, in consequence, consolidating the remnants of the Byzantine empire (Nicaea, Epirus-Thessalonica); 3. in the Byzantine memory the actions of Kaloyan were evaluated negatively, as times of plundering the Byzantine territories and relocations of its population into Bulgaria; 4. for the later Bulgarian historiography the Tsar’s wars with the Latins were of secondary significance, and despite the official union with the Roman church he was remembered as a defender of the Orthodox faith.
Downloads
References
Gjuzelev V., Четвъртият кръстоносен поход, превземането на Цариград и Българо-Латинските отношения 1204–1207 г., „Palaeobulgarica/Старобългаристика” 28.2, 2004, p. 80–88.
Google Scholar
Nicetas Choniates, Historia, rec. I.A. van Dieten, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 1975, p. 535.
Google Scholar
Nicetas Choniates, Orationes et epistulae, rec. I.A. van Dieten, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 1972.
Google Scholar
Dölger F., Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des ostromischen Reiches von 565–1453, vol. II, Regesten von 1025–1204, N 1661.
Google Scholar
Demetrius Chomatenus, Ponemata diaphora, rec. G. Prinzing, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 2002.
Google Scholar
Преписката на папа Инокентия ІІІ с българите, ed. И. Дуйчев, „Годишник на Софийския Университет. Историко-Филологически факултет” 37, 1942, p. 31.
Google Scholar
Georgius Acropolites, Historia, rec. A. Heisenberg, Lipsiae 1903.
Google Scholar
Каухчишвили С.Г., Грузинские источники по истории Византии, vol. I, Тбилиси 1974.
Google Scholar
Geoffroy de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, 202, ed. et trans. E. Faral, Paris 1938.
Google Scholar
de Clari Robert, La conquete de Constantinople, 64, ed. Ph. Lauer, Paris 1924.
Google Scholar
Libro de los fechos et conquistas del principado de la Morea, publiée et traduite pour la première fois par A. Morel-Fatio, Genève 1885.
Google Scholar
Венециански документи за историята на България и българите от ХІІ–ХV в., ed. В. Гюзелев, София 2001.
Google Scholar
Златарски В.Н., История на българската държава през средните векове, vol. ІІІ, Второ българско царство. България при Асеневци (1187–1280), София 1940.
Google Scholar
Божилов И., Гюзелев В., История на средновековна България VІІ–ХІV век, София 1999.
Google Scholar
Gjuzelev V., Bulgarien und Kaiserreich von Nikaia (1204–1261), „Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik” 26, 1977, p. 145–146.
Google Scholar
Ceruti A., Un codice del monastero cistercense di Lucedio, „Archivio storico Italiano” 8, 1881.
Google Scholar
Ostrogorsky G., Geschichte des byzantinischen Staates, München 1963.
Google Scholar
Theodorus Scutariotes, Σύνοψις χρονική, [in:] C. Sathas, Bibliotheca graeca medii aevi, vol. VII, Parisiis 1894, p. 459–460.
Google Scholar
Werke des Patriarchen von Bulgarien Enthymius (1375–1393), nach den besten Handschriften hrsg. von E. Kalužniacki, Wien 1901.
Google Scholar
Божилов И., Тотоманова А., Билярски И., Борилов Синодик. Издание и превод, София 2010.
Google Scholar
Попов А., Обзор хронографов русской редакции, vol. І, Москва 1866, p. 190–192; vol. ІІІ, Москва 1869, p. 33–34, 36–37, 144–145.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.