Authenticity of the “Interrogatio” Iohannis in the Light of Contemporary Deconstructionist Source Criticism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.13.43

Keywords:

Interrogatio Iohannis, Bogomilism, Catharism, dualist doctrine

Abstract

Scholars of Catharism representing the deconstructionist current in the recent years continue their struggle with the traditional interpretation of this heresy which underlines its dualistic character and strong connections with Eastern dualisms – especially with Bogomilism. Their tactics is focused primarily on questioning the authenticity of the sources confirming Cathar dualism and its Eastern roots. Such sources are presented as forgeries invented by the Catholics trying to discredit the “dissidents”. This tactic is directed primarily against the sources of heretical provenience, which are the strongest arguments against the deconstructionist interpretation. Previously, the deconstructionist scholars questioned the acts of the Cathar council in Saint-Felix-De-Caraman, and the so-called “Manichaean treatise” – a Cathar theological work aimed at proving ontological dualism based on the specific interpretation of numerous biblical passages. Currently the deconstructionists speak about the need for verification of another Cathar dualistic treatise – Liber De Duobus pricipiis. Considering this we may expect that soon also the Interrogatio Iohannis will be questioned, as it is a crucial source confirming both the dualism of the Cathars and their dependence on the Bogomils. Before it happens I decided to take a closer look at this apocryphal text. Through the analysis of its doctrine in the light of the Eastern sources concerning the Bogomils I am going to answer the question of whether this work, known only from the Latin manuscripts, indeed could have been created by the Bogomils and if it is possible to question its authenticity using the patterns used by the deconstructionist scholars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Accipite nobis vulpes parvulas, que demoliuntur vineas Domini, ed. B. Delmaire, “Heresis” 17, 1991, p. 10–13.
Google Scholar

Alberici Monachii Trium Fontium Chronicon, ed. P. Scheffer-Boichorst, Hannoverae 1874 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 23].
Google Scholar

Anatemy z Palei historycznej, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].
Google Scholar

La chanson de la croisade albigeoise, vol. I, ed. E. Martin-Chabot, Paris 1931.
Google Scholar

Charte de Niquinta, antipape des heretiques surnommés d’Albigeois, ed. D. Zbiral, [in:] 1209–2009 Cathares. Une histoire à pacifier?, ed. A. Brenon, Loubatieres 2010.
Google Scholar

Cosmas the Priest, The Discours against Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].
Google Scholar

De heresi catharorum in Lombardia, ed. A. Dondaine, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 19, 1949, p. 306–312.
Google Scholar

Eckbertus Abbas Schonaugensis, Sermones contra catharos, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. CXCV, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1855.
Google Scholar

Étienne de Bourbon, Anecdotes historiques, légendes et apologues, ed. A. Lecoy de La Marche, Paris 1877.
Google Scholar

Euthymius of the Periblepton, A letter, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].
Google Scholar

Euthymius Zigabenus, Panoplia dogmatica, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, vol. CXXX, ed. J.P. Migne, Paris 1886.
Google Scholar

Eutymiusz Tyrnowski, Żywot Świętego Hilariona Megleńskiego, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne
Google Scholar

na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].
Google Scholar

Innocentius IV, Inquisitoribus Lombardiae, ut Roberto haeretico debitam poenam imponant, effodiant e terra haereticorum ossa, eaque, necnon quoddam castrum ac domos exurant, vol. I, ed. T. Rippol, Bullarium Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum, Roma 1729.
Google Scholar

Interrogatio Iohannis, [in:] Le livre secret des cathares. Interrogatio Iohannis. Edition critique, traduction commentaire, ed. et trans. E. Bozoky, Paris 2009.
Google Scholar

Jan Egzarcha, Heksameron, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].
Google Scholar

Księga Henocha słowiańska, [in:] Apokryfy Starego Testamentu, ed. R. Rubinkiewicz, Warszawa 1999.
Google Scholar

Manifestatio haeresis albigensium et lugdunensium, ed. A. Cazenave, [in:] Die Mächte des Guten und Bösen. Vorstellungen im XII. u. XIII. Jahrhundert über ihr Wirken in der Heilsgeschichte, ed. A. Zimmermann, Berlin 1977 [= Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 11].
Google Scholar

Matthaeus Parisiensis, Chronica Maiora, ed. F. Liebermann, Hannoverae 1888 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 28].
Google Scholar

Michael Psellos, De daemonum energia seu operatione, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, vol. CXXII, ed. J.P. Migne, Paris 1889.
Google Scholar

Moneta de Cremona, Adversus Catharos et Valdenses libri quinque, ed. T.A. Ricchini, Roma 1743.
Google Scholar

O Morzu Tyberiadzkim, ed., trans. A. Kawecka, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.
Google Scholar

Petrus Vallium Sarnaii Monachus, Hystoria Albigensis, vol. I, ed. P. Guebin, E. Lyon, Paris 1926.
Google Scholar

Rituel, ed. Ch. Thouzellier, [in:] Ch. Thouzellier, Rituel cathare, Paris 1977 [= Sources chrétiennes, 236].
Google Scholar

Rituel Provencal, ed. L. Cledat, [in:] L. Cledat, Le nouveau testament. Traduit au XIIIe siècle en langue provençale suivi d’un rituel cathare, Geneve 1968.
Google Scholar

Roberti Autissiodorensis Chronicon, ed. O. Holder-Egger, Hannoverae 1882 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 26].
Google Scholar

Słowo o Adamie i Ewie, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.
Google Scholar

Summa Fratris Raineri de ordine fratrum praedicatorum, de Catharis et Pauperibus de Lugduno, [in:] Un Traité Neo-Manicheen du 13 siècle, Le Liber de duobus principiis suivi d’un fragment de Rituel Cathare, ed. A. Dondaine, Roma 1939.
Google Scholar

Summula contra hereticos. Un traite contre les cathares du XIIIeme siecle, ed. J. Duvernoy, http://jean.duvernoy.free.fr/text/pdf/summula.pdf [3 V 2023].
Google Scholar

The Synodikon of Tsar Boril Against The Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].
Google Scholar

Theophylact Lecapenus, To Peter, King of Bulgaria about The Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].
Google Scholar

Tractatus de Hereticis, ed. A. Dondaine, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 20, 1950, p. 308–324.
Google Scholar

The Vision of Isaiah, [in:] Heresies of the High Middle Ages, trans. W.L. Wakefield, A.P. Evans, New York–London 1969.
Google Scholar

Acerbi A., La Visione di Isaia nelle vicende dottrinali del catarismo lombardo e provenzale, “Cristianesimo nella storia” 1, 1980, p. 75–122.
Google Scholar

Badalanova Geller F., The Sea of Tiberias: Between Apocryphal Literature and Oral Tradition, [in:] The Old Testament Apocrypha in the Slavonic Tradition. Continuity and Diversity, ed. L. di Tommaso, Ch. Böttrich, Tübingen 2011, p. 13–23.
Google Scholar

Besse G., Histoire de ducs, marquis et comtes de Narbonne, Paris 1660.
Google Scholar

Biget J.L., L’histoire du « catharisme » occitan: un noeud de questions, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 13–34, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2422
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2422

Biget J.L., Les bons hommes sont-ils les fils des bogomiles? Examen critique d’une idée reçue, “Slavica Occitania” 16, 2003, p. 133–188.
Google Scholar

Biget J.L., Réflexions sur « l’hérésie » dans le Midi de la France au Moyen Âge, “Heresis” 36–37, 2001, p. 29–74, 294–295.
Google Scholar

Biget J.L., Retour sur le « concile de Sant-Félix », [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 81–110, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2426
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2426

Biget J.L., Un faux du XIIIe siècle? Examen d’une hypothèse, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 105–133, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00008
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00008

Borst A., Die Katharer, Stuttgart 1953.
Google Scholar

Bozoky E., Circulation et portée de l’apocryphe Interrogatio Iohannis, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 65–80, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2425
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2425

Bozoky E., Le livre secret des cathares. Un lien entre l’orient et l’Occident, “Slavica Occitania” 16, 2003, p. 199–205.
Google Scholar

Brunn U., Cathari, catharistae et cataphrygae. Ancetres des cathares du XII siècle, “Heresis” 36–37, 2002, p. 183–200.
Google Scholar

Brunn U., Des contestataires aux “Cathares”: discours de réforme et propagande antihérétique dans les pays du Rhin et de la Meuse avant l’Inquisition, Paris 2006.
Google Scholar

Compte rendu des interventions de M. Zerner, J.-L. Biget et J. Chiffoleau, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 37–56, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00006

Dalarun J., Dufour A., Grondeux A., Muzerelle D., Zinelli F., La ‘charte de Niquinta’, analyse formelle, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 135–201, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00009

Dondaine A., La hiérarchie cathare en Italie I, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 19, 1949, p. 280–312.
Google Scholar

Dondaine A., La hiérarchie cathare en Italie II, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 20, 1950, p. 234–324.
Google Scholar

Dossat Y., A propos du concile de Saint-Félix: Les Milingues, “Cahiers de Fanjeaux” 3, 1968, p. 201–214, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.1968.945
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.1968.945

Drakopoulos T., L’unité de Bogomilo-Catharisme d’après quatre textes latins analysés à la lumière des sources byzantines, Geneve 2010.
Google Scholar

Duvernoy J., Catharisme. La religion des cathares, Toulouse 1979.
Google Scholar

Duvernoy J., Le catharisme. L’histoire des cathares, Toulouse 1979.
Google Scholar

Hamilton B., The Cathar Council of Saint-Felix Reconsidered, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 48, 1978, p. 23–53.
Google Scholar

Hamilton B., The Origins of the Dualist Church of Drugunthia, “Eastern Churches Review” 6, 1974, p. 115–124.
Google Scholar

Inventer l’hérésie? Discours polémiques et pouvoirs avant l’Inquisition, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 1998.
Google Scholar

Ivanov J., Livres et legendes bogomiles. Aux Sources du Catharisme, Paris 1976.
Google Scholar

Jiménez P., Relire la charte de Niquinta I: Etude et portée de la charte, “Heresis” 22, 1994, p. 1–26.
Google Scholar

Jiménez-Sanchez P., Les catharismes. Modèles dissidents du christianisme médiéval (XIIe–XIIIe siècles), Rennes 2008, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.3688
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.3688

de Jonge M., Tromp J., The Life of Adam and Eve and Related Literature, Sheffield 1997.
Google Scholar

de Lacger L., L’albigeois pendant la crise de l’albigéisme, “Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique” 29, 1933, p. 272–315, 586–633, 849–904.
Google Scholar

Le livre secret des cathares. Interrogatio Iohannis. Edition critique, traduction commentaire, ed. Et trans. E. Bozoky, Paris 2009.
Google Scholar

Myszor W., Średniowieczna religijność ludowa. Dualizm w świetle Interrogatio Iohannis, “Studia Religiologica” 41, 2008, p. 11–19.
Google Scholar

New Perspectives on 2 Enoch, ed. A.A. Orlov, G. Boccaccini, Leiden–Boston 2012.
Google Scholar

Obolensky D., The Bogomils, Cambridge 1948.
Google Scholar

Orlov A.A., From Apocalypticism to Merkabah Mysticism. Studies in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha, Leiden 2007 [= Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, 114], https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154391.i-488
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154391.i-488

Pegg M.G., Le catharisme en questions: falsifiabilité, vérité historique et une nouvelle histoire du christianisme medieval, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 331–371, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2439
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2439

Pegg M.G., The Paradigm of Catharism; or, the Historians’ Illusions, [in:] Cathars in Question, ed. A. Sennis, York 2016 [= Heresy and Inquisition in the Middle Ages], p. 21–52.
Google Scholar

Roche J., Enjeux et embûches de la recherche actuelle sur le catharisme: l’exemple de la charte de Nicétas, [in:] Autour de Montaillou, un village occitan. Histoire et religiosité d’une communauté villageoise au Moyen Age. Actes du colloque de Montaillou, 25–26–27 août 2000, ed. A. Brenon, Ch. Dieulafait, E. Le Roy Ladurie, Castelnaud-la-Chapelle 2001, p. 75–117.
Google Scholar

Roche J., Une Église cathare. L’évêché du Carcassès, Carcassonne-Béziers-Narbonne, Cahors 2005.
Google Scholar

Saldzhiev H., On the Prehistory of Bogomilism – The Historical and Religious Continuum of the Dualistic Groups in Early Medieval Bulgaria (8th–10th Century), “Studia Ceranea” 11, 2021, p. 721–761, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.11.38
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.11.38

Słowo o widzeniu Barucha, kiedy to anioł, posłany na świętą górę zwaną Syjonem, płakał nad zniewoleniem Jerozolimy, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.
Google Scholar

Stoyanov Y., Medieval Christian Dualist Perceptions and Conceptions of Biblical Paradise, “Studia Ceranea” 3, 2013, p. 149–166, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.11
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.11

Stoyanov Y., The Debate on Medieval Western Christian Dualism through the Prism of Slavonic Pseudepigrapha, “Scrinium” 14, 2018, p. 334–350, https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00141P23
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00141P23

Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].
Google Scholar

Théry J., L’hérésie des bons hommes. Comment nommer la dissidence religieuse non vaudoise ni béguine en Languedoc (XIIe – début XIVe siècle)?, “Heresis” 36–37, 2002, p. 297–298.
Google Scholar

Trivellone A., Des Églises cathares en Italie? Pour une étude critique des sources italiennes, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 37–63, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2424
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2424

Turdeanu E., Apocryphes slaves et roumains de l’Ancien Testament, Leiden 1981 [= Studia in veteris testamenti pseudepigrapha, 5], https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004675506
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004675506

Wakefield W.L., Evans A.P., Heresies of the High Middle Ages, New York–London 1969.
Google Scholar

Zbiral D., La Charte de Niquinta et le rassemblement de Saint-Félix: État de la question, [in:] 1209–2009 Cathares. Une histoire à pacifier?, ed. A. Brenon, Loubatieres 2010.
Google Scholar

Zbiral D., Největší hereze. Dualismus, učenecká vyprávění o katarství a budování křesťanské Evropy, Brno 2007.
Google Scholar

Zerner M., La charte de Niquinta, l’hérésie et l’érudition des années 1650–1660, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 203–248, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00010
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00010

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Czarnecki, P. (2023). Authenticity of the “Interrogatio” Iohannis in the Light of Contemporary Deconstructionist Source Criticism. Studia Ceranea, 13, 99–123. https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.13.43

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.