The Social Organization of Merchants’ Activities. An Interactionist Study of Urban Marketplaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.4.07Keywords:
Symbolic Interactionism, Bazaar, Street Vendors, Grounded Theory, Qualitative Economic SociologyAbstract
The article briefly presents the empirical results of a large research project focused on Polish urban marketplaces, commonly known as bazaars, and their interactional order. Due to the spatial separation and legal regulations concerning bazaar trade, a relatively constant community of market vendors is created in the area of the particular marketplace. The primary activity of each merchant is to offer and sell goods; however, the specificity of marketplace trade results in the necessity to maintain relationships with other vendors to keep this primary activity going. Thus, the activities of merchants are carried out in the same direction for both economic results and performance (sales and profit) and social action, that is, building and managing relations with vendors operating in the same marketplace. A wide range of activities and interaction strategies is developed that create an order of interactions between vendors, both in terms of perceiving and assigning meanings, interpreting, and taking actions. The consequences of such an interactional foundation affect the economic layer of the market, embedding, on the one hand, economic phenomena in social phenomena, and, on the other hand, generating paradoxes of prices and competition—the two economic concepts that cannot be analyzed without their social contexts.
Downloads
References
Anderson, Leon. 2006. “Analytic Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(4):460-471.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
Azarian, Reza. 2015. “Joint Actions, Stories and Symbolic Structures: A Contribution to Herbert Blumer’s Conceptual Framework.” Sociology 51(3):685-700.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515609029
Baker, Wayne and Robert Faulkner. 2004. “Social Networks and Loss of Capital.” Social Networks 26:91-111.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.01.004
Bischof-Kohler, Doris. 1990. “Frau und Karriere in psychobiologischer Sicht [Woman and Career from a Psychobiological Point of View].” Zeitschrift für Arbeits- u. Organisationspsychologie 34:17-28.
Google Scholar
Bischof-Kohler, Doris. 1992. “Geschlechtstypische Besonderheiten im Konkurrenzverhalten: Evolutionäre Grundlagen und entwicklungspsychologische Fakten [Gender-Specific Characteristics in Competitive Behavior: Evolutionary Basics and Developmental Psychological Facts].” Pp. 251-281 in Personalpolitik aus der Sicht von Frauen. Was kann die Personalforschung von der Frauenforschung lernen? [Personnel Policy from the Perspective of Women. What Can Human Resources Research Learn from Women’s Research?], edited by G. Krell and M. Osterloh. Munich: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1990. Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change: A Critical. Analysis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce and Sarah Babb. 2000. Economy/Society: Markets, Meanings and Social Structure. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225739
Charmaz, Kathy. 2009. Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej [Constructing Grounded Theory. Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Chiffoleau, Yuna and Catherine Laporte. 2006. “Price Formation: The Case of the Burgundy Wine Market.” Reveu française de sociologie 5:157-182.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.475.0157
Chiu, Chihsin. 2013. “Informal Management, Interactive Performance: Street Vendors and Police in a Taipei Night Market.” International Development Planning Review 35(4):335-352.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2013.24
DiMaggio, Paul. 1990. “Cultural Aspects of Economic Organization and Behavior.” Pp. 113-136 in Beyond the Market Place: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by R. Friedland and A. F. Robertson. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn and Arthur Bochner. 2016. Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Telling Stories. Walnut Creek, CA: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1978. “The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant Marketing.” The American Economic Review 68(2):28-32.
Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alex. 2011. “Exchanging Social Positions: Enhancing Intersubjective Coordination within a Joint Task.” European Journal of Social Psychology 41:608-616.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.788
Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine do Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Gorzko, Marek. 2008. Procedury i emergencja. O metodologii klasycznych odmian teorii ugruntowanej [Procedures and Emergence. On the Methodology of Classical Varieties of Grounded Theory]. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6):1360-1380.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job. A Study of Contacts and Career. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1:201-233.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3):481-510.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Granovetter, Mark. 1992. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” Pp. 22-45 in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg. New York, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338-3
Ho, Karen. 2009. Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street. Durham, NC: Duke Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391371
Hughes, Everett C. 1958. Men and Their Work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Michael, ed. 2009. Encountering the Everyday. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01976-9
Kacperczyk, Anna. 2017. “Rozum czy emocje? O odmianach autoetnografii, epistemologicznych pomostach i przepaściach między nimi [ Reason or Emotions? On the Varieties of Autoethnography Epistemological Bridges and Gaps between Them].” Kultura i Społeczeństwo LXI(3):127-148.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2017.61.3.8
Karp, David, William Yoels, and Barbara Vann. 2003. Sociology in Everyday Life. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2000. Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana [Studies in the Methodology of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2005. “Teoria ugruntowana a kontekst odkrycia. Naturalna historia pewnego badania [Grounded Theory and Serendipity. Natural History of a Study].” In W kręgu socjologii interpretatywnej – zastosowanie metod jakościowych [In the Area of Interpretative Sociology—The Use of Qualitative Methods], edited by J. Leoński and A. Kołodziej-Durnaś. Szczecin: USz, Economicus.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2007. “Działanie przedsiębiorcze. Auto-praca nad tożsamością a społeczny proces konstruowania motywacji do działania przedsiębiorczego [Entrepreneurial Actions. Auto-Work on Identity and the Social Process of Constructing Motivation for Entrepreneurial Activity].” Pp. 72-115 in W kręgu socjologii interpretatywnej. Badania jakościowe nad tożsamością [In the Circle of Interpretative Sociology. Qualitative Research on Identity], edited by J. Leoński and U. Kozłowska. Szczecin: Economicus.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2008. “Economic Sociology as a Sociology of Economic Action.” In Management: Qualitative And Quantitative Research, edited by A. Nowak and B. Glinka. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2012. “Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury [Visual Grounded Theory. The Basic Rules and Procedures].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 8(1):12-45.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.8.1.02
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2019. “Visual Images and Grounded Theory Methodology.” Pp. 352-374 in The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory, edited by A. Bryant and K. Charmaz. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526436061.n19
Kurczewski, Janusz. 2010. “Fenomenologia bazaru [The Phenomenology of the Bazaar].” Pp. 31-50 in Wielkie bazary warszawskie [Great Warsaw Bazaars], edited by J. Kurczewski, M. Cichomski, and K. Wiliński. Warsaw: Trio.
Google Scholar
Lofland, John. 1970. “Interactionist Imagery and Analytic Interruptus.” Pp. 35-45 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by T. Shibutani. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Lofland, John. 1995. “Analytic Ethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24:4-24.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024001002
Marciniak, Lukasz. 2016. Bazary: kooperacja czy konkurencja? [Bazaars: Cooperation or Competition?]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ.
Google Scholar
McKenzie, Roderick. 1921. “The Neighborhood: A Study of Local Life in the City of Columbus, Ohio.” American Journal of Sociology 27(2):145-168.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/213301
Misztal, Bronisław. 1971. “Zróżnicowanie społeczne zbiorowości przekupniów na Bazarze Różyckiego [Social Diversity of the Community of Vendors at the Różycki Bazaar].” Studia Socjologiczne 3.
Google Scholar
Moeran, Brian. 2006. Ethnography at Work. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Google Scholar
Papadantonakis, Max. 2020. “Black Athenians: Making and Resisting Racialized Symbolic Boundaries in the Greek Street Market.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 49(3):291-317.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241619891229
Park, Robert and Ernest Burgess, eds. 1925. The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Prus, Robert. 1989a. Pursuing Customers. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Prus, Robert. 1989b. Making Sales. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Rosales, Rocio. 2013. “Survival, Economic Mobility and Community among Los Angeles Fruit Vendors.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39:697-717.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.756659
Smith, Charles W. 1990. The Social Construction of Value. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Snow, David, Charles Morrill, and Leon Anderson. 2003. “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking. Ethnography and Theoretical Development.” Ethnography 4:181-200.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042002
Strauss, Anselm L. 1962. “Transformations of Identity.” Pp. 63-85 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by A. M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L. 1969. Mirrors and Masks. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.
Google Scholar
Velthuis, Olav. 2003. “Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries.” Theory and Society 32(2):181-215.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023995520369
Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.