Freelance Workers—Experiencing a Career Outside an Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.4.06Keywords:
Freelance, Career Outside an Organization, Boundaryless Career, Professional Work Experience, Grounded TheoryAbstract
This article focuses on the issues of everyday work as a self-employed, professional freelancer in Poland. The appearance of this specific category of workers on the labor market is connected with certain major changes on the economic, technological, and socio-cultural levels. The career of a freelancer is sometimes considered to be an antithesis of a corporate career. The key points are: working on one’s own, functioning outside the traditional organizational structures, HR management and supervision, promotion procedures, corporate career paths, et cetera. For a freelancer, the organization is not “an employer,” but rather “a client” or “a business partner.” The manager of the organization is not “his boss” and the employees are not his “colleagues.” As we can observe, most of the typical boundaries of a career are blurred here and that is one of the reasons why it arouses curiosity as an unusual phenomenon. The article aims to present a sociological perspective regarding the career of a freelancer in Poland. A framework of symbolic interactionism and grounded theory were applied to the author’s research (conducted in 2009-14) on which the article is based. Its first part focuses on the theoretical background and the methods that were used to collect and analyze data. The second part includes some of the author’s findings and conclusions on a freelance career from the interactionist perspective, as well as a discussion about the possible agreement and discrepancies between the author’s understanding of freelance against the widely discussed concept of precarity.
Downloads
References
Barley, Stephen R. and Gideon Kunda. 2006. “Contracting: A New Form of Professional Practice.” Academy of Management Perspectives 19:45-66.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873409
Beck, Urlich. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. Oxford: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1952. “The Career of the Chicago Public Schoolteacher.” American Journal of Sociology 57(5):470-477.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/221015
Becker, Howard S. 1970. Sociological Work: Method and Substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Burgess, Robert G. 1982. Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Clinton, Michael, Peter Totterdell, and Stephen Wood. 2006. “A Grounded Theory of Portfolio Working. Experiencing the Smallest of Small Businesses.” International Small Business Journal 24(2):179-203.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606061843
Defillippi, Robert J. and Michael B. Arthur. 1994. “The Boundaryless Career: A Competency-Based Perspective.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(4):307-324.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403
Denzin, Norman K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Domecka, Markieta. 2005. “Praca jako doświadczenie biograficzne [Work as a Biographical Experience].” Pp. 231-252 in Konstruowanie jaźni i społeczeństwa. Europejskie warianty symbolicznego interakcjonizmu [Constructing Self and Society. European Variants of Symbolic Interactionism], edited by E. Hałas and K. T. Konecki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar
El Kamel, Leila and Benny Rigaux-Bricmont. 2009. “Online Qualitative Research and Meta Verses.” Materials from the 4th Congress of Cyber Society: Analog Crisis, Digital Future.
Google Scholar
Fersch, Barbara. 2009. Work and Life Patterns of Freelancers in the (New) Media. A Comparative Analysis in the Context of Welfare State and Labour Market Regulations in Denmark and Germany. Aalborg: Department of Sociology, Social Work and Organisation Aalborg University.
Google Scholar
Fontana, Andrea and James H. Frey. 2009. “Wywiad. Od neutralności do politycznego zaangażowania [Interview. From Neutrality to Political Commitment].” Pp. 81-127 in Metody badań jakościowych [Qualitative Research Methods], edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Furmanek, Waldemar. 2006. Zarys humanistycznej teorii pracy [Outline of the Humanistic Theory of Work]. Warsaw: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych
Google Scholar
Gądecki, Jacek, Marcin Jewdokimow, and Magdalena Żadkowska. 2017. Tu się pracuje! Socjologiczne studium pracy zawodowej prowadzonej w domu na zasadach telepracy [People Work Here! A Sociological Study of Professional Work Conducted at Home on the Basis of Telework]. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Libron – Filip Lohner.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. 2002. “Constructivist Grounded Theory?”Forum Qualitative Social Research 3(3).
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Judith Holton. 2004. “Remodeling Grounded Theory.” The Grounded Theory Review. An International Journal 4(1):1-112.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1971. Status Passage. A Formal Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Hall, Douglas T. 1976. Career in Organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Google Scholar
Hałas, Elżbieta. 2006. Interakcjonizm symboliczny [Symbolic Interactionism]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Handy, Charles. 1991. The Age of Unreason. London: Arrow Books.
Google Scholar
Herriot, Peter and Carole Pemberton. 1996. “Contracting Careers.” Human Relations 49(6):757-790.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900603
Hughes, Everett C. 1958. Men and Their Work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Hughes, Everett C. 1997. “Careers.” Qualitative Sociology 20(3):389-397.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024731416961
Jones, Robert A. 1994. “The Ethics of Research in Cyberspace.” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 4(3):30-35.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249410798894
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 1988. “Praca w koncepcji socjologii interakcjonistycznej [Work in the Lens of Interactionist Sociology].” Studia Socjologiczne 1:225-245.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 1998. “Czas a badania socjologiczne [Time and Sociological Research].” Folia Sociologica 27. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2000. Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana [Studies in the Methodology of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Markham, Anette and Elizabeth Buchanan. 2012. “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee.” Retrieved January 17, 2019 ( https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf ).
Google Scholar
Miller, Piotr. 2016. Freelance. Kariera zawodowa poza organizacją [Freelance. Professional Career Outside the Organization]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Mills, Charles Wright. 1943. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists.” American Journal of Sociology 49(2):165-180.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219350
Mirvis, Philip H. and Douglas T. Hall. 1994. “Psychological Success and the Boundaryless Career.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(4):365-380.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150406
Newman, David M. 2006. Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Ray. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts and How They Get You Through the Day. New York: Paragon House.
Google Scholar
Peiperl, Maury A. and Yehuda Baruch. 1997. “Back to Square Zero: The Post-Corporate Career.” Organizational Dynamics 25(4):7-22.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90033-4
Piotrowski, Andrzej. 1998. Ład interakcji. Studia z socjologii interpretatywnej [Order of Interaction. Studies in Interpretative Sociology]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Pongratz, Hans J. and Gerd-Günter Voß. 2001. “From Employee to ‘Entreployee’—Towards a ‘Self-Entrepreneurial’ Workforce?” Sozialwissenschaftliche Informationen 2001:42-52.
Google Scholar
Prus, Robert C. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 1990. Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Random House USA Inc.
Google Scholar
Spicer, Andre. 2011. “Guilty Lives: The Authenticity Trap at Work.” Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization 11(1):46-62.
Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Strauss, Anselm L. 1995. “Identity, Biography, History and Symbolic Representations.” Social Psychology Quarterly” 58(1):4-12.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2787139
Strauss, Anselm L. and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Sullivan, Sherry E. 1999. “The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 25:456-484.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500308
Woroniecka, Grażyna. 2007. “Interakcja a świat społeczny. O programie metodologicznym Herberta Blumera [Interaction and the Social World. On the Methodological Program of Herbert Blumer].” Pp. XXI-XXVII in Interakcjonizm symboliczny [Symbolic Interactionism] by H. Blumer. Cracow: Nomos.
Google Scholar
Wyka, Anna. 1993. Badacz społeczny wobec doświadczenia [Social Researcher in the Face of Experience]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.