Meetings or Power Weeks? Boundary Work in a Transnational Police Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.05Keywords:
Occupational Culture, Identity, Meetings, Border Police, Project, BureaucracyAbstract
Meetings are common in contemporary working life, but they are often overlooked in academic studies and sometimes defined as empty or boring by employees. Yet, the meeting society is being reproduced again and again. There seem to be hidden ways to incorporate meetings into today’s working life without arousing critique about pointless activities and deviations from what should really be done. One strategy was illustrated in a study of a transnational police project. Police culture celebrates visible crime fighting, which is associated with action, physical toughness, and capturing criminals. The police officers involved in the project emphasized the need to avoid “a lot of meetings,” but de facto constructed their project as meetings. Nonetheless, the project was declared a success. We analyze this paradox in terms of boundary work concerning meetings; the police officers turned some meetings into “real police work” by discursively and practically removing them from the category of bureaucracy and its associations with formalities, rigidity, and documentation. The most important example is how an “operational action group meeting” was renamed “power weeks,” eradicating the very word “meeting” from the term. This was closely associated with increased informality and multi-tasking during these gatherings.
Downloads
References
Åkerström, Malin. 2011. “Slaps, Punches, Pinches—But Not Violence: Boundary Work in Nursing Homes for the Elderly.” Symbolic Interaction 25(4):515-536.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2002.25.4.515
Åkerström, Malin. 2018. “The Merry-Go-Round of Meetings: Embracing Meetings in a Youth Care Project.” Sociological Focus 52(1):50-64.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1484242
Allen, Davina. 2001. “Narrating Nursing Jurisdiction: Atrocity Stories and Boundary-Work.” Symbolic Interaction 24(1):75-103.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.1.75
Allen, Joseph, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven Rogelberg, (eds.). 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735
Andersson, Cederholm E. 2010. “Effective Emotions: The Enactment of a Work Ethic in the Swedish Meeting Industry.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 2:381-400.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10222381
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca and Sandra Harris. 1997. Managing Language: The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.44
Chan, Janet. 1997. Changing Police Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518195
Colombeau, Sara C. 2015. “Policing the Internal Schengen Borders—Managing the Double Bind between Free Movement and Migration Control.” An International Journal of Research and Policy 27(5):480-493.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1072531
Darden, Donna and Alan Marks. 1999. “Boredom: A Socially Disvalued Emotion.” Sociological Spectrum 19:13-37.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/027321799280280
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001
Emerson, Robert M. and Melvin Pollner. 1976. “Dirty Work Designations: Their Features and Consequences in a Psychiatric Setting.” Social Problems 23(3):243-254.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799771
Fangen, Katrine. 2005. Deltagande observation [Participant Observation]. Malmo: Liber.
Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas. 1995. “Boundaries of Science.” Pp. 393-443 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Hage, Ghassan. 2005. “A Not So Multi-Sited Ethnography of a Not So Imagined Community.” Anthropological Theory 5(4):463-475.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499605059232
Hall, Patrik. 2012. Managementbyråkrati [Management Bureaucracy]. Malmo: Liber.
Google Scholar
Hall, Patrik, Vesa Leppänen, and Malin Åkerström. 2019. Mötesboken [The Meeting Book]. Malmo: Egalité.
Google Scholar
Holstein, James and Jaber Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. London: Sage
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986120
Kello, John. 2015. “The Science and Practice of Workplace Meetings.” Pp. 709-734 in The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, edited by J. Allen et al. New York: Cambridge University Press
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.030
Kleinman, Lisa. 2010. Technology Multitasking in Organizational Meetings. PhD Dissertation, Texas University, Department of Information.
Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:167-195.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Loftus, Bethan. 2010. “Police Occupational Culture: Classic Themes, Altered Times.” Policing and Society 20(1):1-20.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460903281547
Loftus, Behtan. 2013. “Border Regimes and the Sociology of Policing.” An International Journal of Research and Policy 25(1):115-125.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.802788
Mahmood, Qaisar. 2017. “En gravallvarlig figur i demokratins tjänst [A Solemn Figure in the Service of Democracy].” Fokus 45:42.
Google Scholar
Manning, Peter. 2007. “A Dialectic of Organizational and Occupational Culture.” Pp. 47-83 in Police Occupational Culture, edited by M. O’Neill, M. Marks, and A.-M. Singh. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Packendorff, Johann and Monika Lindgren. 2014. “Projectification and Its Consequences.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 171:7-21.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807
Reiner, Robert. 1985. The Politics of the Police. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Reuss-Ianni, Elizabeth. 2011. Two Cultures of Policing: Street Cops and Management Cops. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Helen. 1989. The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Springer Science.
Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1978. “K is Mentally Ill. The Anatomy of a Factual Account.” Sociology 12(1):23-53.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200103
Thedvall, Renita. 2006. Eurocrats at Work. Negotiating Transparency in Postnational Employment Policy. PhD Dissertation, Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, 58, Stockholm University.
Google Scholar
Thelander, Joakim and Malin Åkerström. 2019. “Ruled by the Calendar? Public Sector and University Managers on Meetings, Calendars and Time.” Sociologisk Forskning 56(2):149-165.
Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie. 1999. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Google Scholar
Uhnoo, Sara. 2011. Våldets regler [Rules of Violence]. Goteborg: daidalos.
Google Scholar
Van Vree, Wilbert. 1999. Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. London: Leicester University Press.
Google Scholar
Van Vree, Wilbert. 2011. “Meetings: The Frontline of Civilization.” The Sociological Review 59(1):241-262.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01987.x
Vaughn, Diane. 2015. “Theorizing: Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social Organization.” In Theorizing in Social Science, edited by R. Swedberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wasson, Christina. 2006. “Being at Two Spaces at Once: Virtual Meetings and Their Representation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16(1):103-130.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.1.103
Yahklef, Sophia. 2018. United Agents. Community of Practice within Border Policing in the Baltic Sea Area. Dissertation Series 119, Lund University, Department of Sociology.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.