Skill and Deskilling in Two Automotive Assembly Plants in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.19.1.05Keywords:
Skills, Deskilling, Qualitative Methodology, Sociology of Work, Automotive Assembly, Technology, South AfricaAbstract
This article presents research on skills development and workplace change complexities within two automotive assembly plants in Pretoria, South Africa. Auto assembly companies are also termed Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). Since 1995, South African OEMs have become fully integrated into the global networks of their foreign parent companies. As South Africa’s leading manufacturing sector, the automotive industry’s increasing importance is reflected in its exports, investments, and contribution to the country’s gross domestic product. The two companies are global multinationals situated in one of South Africa’s most globally integrated sectors that have undergone significant mechanization and automation since the 1990s. Therefore, these companies present a relevant site for studying changes in the labor process and the tendencies of deskilling in these workplace environments.
The research is based on a qualitative research design that used semi-structured interviews with workers, supervisors, and managers across two plants that assemble motor vehicles in South Africa. The objective of the research was to understand the nature of changes to workplace production methods that influence the character of skills amongst the workforce. This paper studies workers’ experiences on how changes in work processes have impacted their work skills and contributed to the processes of deskilling. Present studies of skills in South Africa have prioritized large-scale labor market aggregate data analysis or reforms in education and training policies of the state. This paper brings a perspective on the labor process changes that are informed by concrete analysis of the production process and how technological changes shape the character of skills formation within automotive assembly plants. The value of such an approach is that it brings to the discussion of technology and workplace change a more specific set of experiences that transcends the often speculative and mythical discussion about the impact of technology on work. This article highlights the importance of understanding workers’ voices, shift supervisors, and managers on the contested nature of skills development within capitalist enterprises. The findings illustrate the contradictory nature of technological change and skills development. This is shown by discussing the following themes that emerged from the findings: 1) worker responses to the introduction of robots in the workplace environment, 2) the deskilling challenge on the two plants, and 3) grappling with the turnover times of capitalist production. I conclude the paper by revisiting the key findings of the research and showing the implications for future studies of deskilling in contemporary capitalist enterprises. The significance of these findings ultimately points to the importance of locating labor processes and deskilling in the context of the political economy of the capitalist mode of production and how it is reshaping the content of work in modern automotive assembly plants.
Downloads
References
Aneesh, Aneesh. 2001. “Skills Saturation: Rationalization and Post-Industrial Work.” Theory and Society 30(3):363-396.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017567412100
Barchiesie, Franco. 1998. “Restructuring, Flexibility, and the Politics of Workplace Subjectivity: A Worker Inquiry in the South African Car Industry.” Rethinking Marxism 10(4):105-133.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935699808685555
Benanav, Aaron. 2019. “Automation and the Future of Work—I.” New Left Review 119:5-38.
Google Scholar
Bonacich, Edna and Jake Wilson. 2008. Getting the Goods: Ports, Labour, and the Logistics Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the 20th Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1
Brynjolfsson, Erik and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 2009. The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520943384
Chen, Kelly W. and Jung W. Sonn. 2019. “Contingent Proletarianization of Creative Labor: Deskilling in the Xianyou Classical Furniture Cluster.” Geoforum 99:248-256.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.008
Corbin, Juliet and Anselm L. Strauss. 2012. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Cruz, Sofia A. and Bruno Monteiro. 2017. “Rescuing the Error: A Methodological Note on the Use of Reflexivity in the Research Process.” Qualitative Sociology Review 13(4):122-140.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.4.05
Forrest, Kally. 2011. Metal That Will Not Bend: National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa 1980-1995. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18772/12011095348
Hlatshwayo, Mondli. 2013. A Sociological Analysis of Trade Union Responses to Technological Changes at the Arcellor Mittal Vanderbijlpark Plant 1989-2011. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg.
Google Scholar
Kenny, Bridget and Edward Webster. 2021. “The Return of the Labour Process: Race, Skill and Technology in South African Labour Studies.” Work in the Global Economy 1(1-2):1-19.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/273241721X16276384395872
Leslie, Deborah and Norma Rantisi. 2019. “Deskilling in Cultural Industries: Corporatization, Standardization, and the Erosion of Creativity at the Cirque du Soleil.” Geoforum 99:257-266.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.011
Lofland, John et al. 2006. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Australia, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom, United States: Thomson, Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Machacek, Erika and Martin Hess. 2019. “Whither ‘High-Tech’ Labor? Codification and (De-)Skilling in Automotive Components Value Chains.” Geoforum 99:287-295.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.023
Mashilo, Alex M. 2010. Changes in Work and Production Organization in the Automotive Industry Value Chain: An Evaluation of the Responses by Labour in South Africa. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Google Scholar
merSETA. 2013. Sector Skills Plan Update. 2013/14-2017/18. Retrieved December 07, 2022 https://www.merseta.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/merSETA-SSP-2013_2014.pdf
Google Scholar
Mngxitama, Andile. 2009. “The Racist Slant of Sociology Research.” The Weekender, July 18-19. Johannesburg: BDFM Publishers.
Google Scholar
Neuman, Lawrence W. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Ngcwangu, Siphelo. 2016. Sociological Assessment of South Africa’s Skills Development Regime: 1990-2008. Doctoral dissertation. University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg.
Google Scholar
Previtali, Fabiane S. and Cílson C. Fagiani. 2015. “Deskilling and Degradation of Labour in Contemporary Capitalism: The Continuing Relevance of Braverman.” Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 9(1):76-91.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.9.1.0076
Richardson, Lizzie and David Bissell. 2019. “Geographies of Digital Skill.” Geoforum 99:278-286.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.014
Ruggunan, Shaun. 2013. Introduction to Qualitative Analysis and Writing Up Your Analysis: Thematic Analysis. Presentation in Discipline of Human Resources Management.
Google Scholar
Sawchuk, Peter H. 2006. “Use-Value and the Re-Thinking of Skills, Learning and the Labour Process.” Journal of Industrial Relations 48(5):593-617.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185606070107
Silva, Eric O., Christopher J. Gillmann, and KayAnna L. Tate. 2018. “Confronting Institutional Discrimination in a Color-Blind World.” Qualitative Sociology Review 14(1):84-108.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.14.1.05
Spencer, David. 2016. “Work In and Beyond the Second Machine Age: The Politics of Production and Digital Technologies.” Work, Employment & Society 31(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016645716
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016645716
Thompson, Paul and Chris Smith. 2009. “Waving Not Drowning: Explaining and Exploring the Resilience of Labour Process Theory.” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 21(3):253-262.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-009-9116-4
Tshoaedi, Cynthia M. 2008. Roots of Women’s Union Activism: South Africa 1973-2003. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Leiden University, Netherlands.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.