Biographical Work as a Mechanism of Dealing with Precarity and Precariousness

Jacek Burski; Adam Mrozowicki; Aleksandra Drabina-Różewicz; Agata Krasowska

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.18.2.05

Authors

Jacek Burski University of Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9987-2420
Adam Mrozowicki University of Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-5036
Aleksandra Drabina-Różewicz University of Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-6470
Agata Krasowska University of Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-445X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.2.05

Keywords:

Precarious Work, Biographical Work, Precariousness, Precarity, Young Workers

Abstract

The article aims to explore the relationship between biographical work and the strategies of managing precarity (low-paid and unstable employment) and precariousness (insecurity and instability of life conditions in general) in Poland’s new capitalism. Poland witnessed the rise of precarity during the entire capitalist transformation after 1989, while the expansion of precarious, temporary, and non-standard employment accelerated in the first two decades of the 21st century. The main theoretical framework of the article is based on concepts deriving from biographical sociology and was elaborated during a joint workshop with German biographical researcher, Fritz Schütze, within the PREWORK project. The case of a young female shop assistant, Helena, with a difficult family and work background was selected from a larger sample of 63 biographical narrative interviews with precarious young workers in Poland. Based on the case study and the broader context of the research project, it is argued that biographical work may have the potential for questioning and challenging precarity; yet, without necessary biographical and social resources, such a process is hard to be completed. As a result, the paper questions the macrosocial vision of “precariat” as the “class in-the-making” and instead offers a detailed account of the microsocial ways of dealing with precarity by a representative of the most disadvantaged group of precarious young workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jacek Burski, University of Wrocław, Poland

Jacek Burski is a sociologist and an assistant professor at the Institute of Sociology of the University of Wrocław. He has a post-doc in the NCN COV-WORK project on the consequences of the socio-economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. His academic interests cover the sociology of work, the sociology of biography, precarity, and social change.

Adam Mrozowicki, University of Wrocław, Poland

Adam Mrozowicki is a sociologist and an associate professor at the Institute of Sociology, University of Wrocław, Poland. The leader of the UWr team in the NCN-DFG PREWORK project on precarious young workers in Poland and Germany and the leader of the NCN COV-WORK project on the consequences of the socio-economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. His academic interests lie in the sociology of work, economic sociology, comparative employment relations, precarity, critical social realism, and biographical methods.

Aleksandra Drabina-Różewicz, University of Wrocław, Poland

Aleksandra Drabina-Różewicz has a Ph.D. in social sciences in the field of sociology. The author of publications and the editor of monographs on masculinity, femininity, work, and pop culture. A researcher in national and international projects: NCN PREWORK “Young Precarious Workers in Poland and Germany: A Comparative Sociological Study on Working and Living Conditions, Social Consciousness, and Civic Engagement” (2016-2020); NCN “Social Structure, Networks, and Consumption Tastes and Practices” (2018-2021); NCN COV-WORK “Socio-Economic Consciousness, Work Experiences, and Coping Strategies of Poles in the Context of the Post-Pandemic Crisis” (2021-2025). Her research interests focus on qualitative research (biographical method, visual analysis of pop culture).

Agata Krasowska, University of Wrocław, Poland

Agata Krasowska has a Ph.D. in sociology and is an assistant professor at the Department of Sociology of Work and Economy at the Institute of Sociology of the University of Wrocław. Her main research interests lie in the sociology of change, the sociology of knowledge and culture, and the sociology of work. She examines the issues of precariousness, work experience, and coping strategies of employees in a (post)pandemic crisis. She also deals with the methodology of qualitative research, with particular emphasis on the biographical method and autoethnography. She is currently working on a grant and a monograph on experiencing mental crises by precarious workers.

References

Arnold, Dennis and Joseph R. Bongiovi. 2012. “Precarious, Informalizing, and Flexible Work: Transforming Concepts and Understandings.” American Behavioral Scientist 57(3):289-308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212466239
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212466239

Betts, Sandra et al. 2008. “Biographical Counselling: An Introduction.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1-2:5-58.
Google Scholar

Bove, Arianna, Annalisa Murgia, and Emiliana Armano. 2017. “Mapping Precariousness: Subjectivities and Resistance. An Introduction.” Pp. 1-12 in Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity, and Uncertain Livelihoods. Subjectivities and Resistance, edited by E. Armano, A. Bove, and A. Murgia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315593838-1

Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.
Google Scholar

Castel, Robert. 2000. “The Roads to Disaffiliation: Insecure Work and Vulnerable Relationships.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(3):519-535.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00262

Doellgast, Virgina, Nathan Lillie, and Valeria Pulignano. 2018. Reconstructing Solidarity. Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791843.001.0001

Dörre, Klaus. 2019. “Precariousness in the Eurozone. Causes, Effects, and Developments.” Pp. 15-32 in Confronting Crisis and Precariousness. Organised Labour and Social Unrest in the European Union, edited by S. Schmalz and B. Sommer. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Google Scholar

Gardawski, Juliusz. 2020. “Wizje gospodarki dobrze urządzonej młodzieży polskiej i młodzieży niemieckiej [The Visions of Well-Ordered Economy of Polish Youth and German Youth].” Pp. 277-313 in Oswajanie niepewności. Studia społeczno-ekonomiczne nad młodymi pracownikami sprekaryzowanymi [Taming Uncertainty. Socio-Economic Studies on Precarized Young Workers], edited by A. Mrozowicki and J. Czarzasty. Warsaw: Scholar.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1968. Time for Dying. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-196812000-00048

Golczyńska-Grondas, Agnieszka. 2012. “Biografie dorosłych wychowanków domów dziecka – próba analizy socjologicznej [Biographies of Adults Brought Up in Orphanages—An Attempt at Sociological Analysis].” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica 41:5-21.
Google Scholar

Haratyk, Karol, Kamila Biały, and Marcin Gońda. 2017. “Biographical Meanings of Work: The Case of a Polish Freelancer.” Przeglad Socjologii Jakościowej 13(4):136-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.13.4.08
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.13.4.08

Kalleberg, Arne L. 2009. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Review 74(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101

Kaźmierska, Kaja. 2008. Biografia i pamięć. Na przykładzie pokoleniowego doświadczenia ocalonych z zagłady [Biography and Memory. On the Case of Generational Experience of Holocaust Survivors]. Cracow: Nomos.
Google Scholar

Kaźmierska, Kaja and Fritz Schütze. 2013. “Wykorzystanie autobiograficznego wywiadu narracyjnego w badaniach nad konstruowaniem obrazu przeszłości w biografii. Na przykładzie socjologicznego porównania narracji na temat życia w PRL-u i NRD [Application of Biographical Analysis in Research on Constructing the Image of the Past in the Biography. Based on the Example of Sociological Comparison of Narratives in the People’s Republic of Poland and the German Democratic Republic].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 9(4):122-138.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.9.4.08

Kozek, Wiesława, Julia Kubisa, and Marianna Zieleńska. 2017. Utrzymać się na powierzchni. O walce z biedą w pięciu krajach europejskich w perspektywie indywidualnego sprawstwa [ Staying Afloat. On the Fight against Poverty in Five European Countries from the Perspective of Individual Agency]. Warsaw: Scholar.
Google Scholar

Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. London: Verso.
Google Scholar

Maciejewska, Małgorzata, Adam Mrozowicki, and Agnieszka Piasna. 2016. “The Silent and Crawling Crisis: International Competition, Labour Market Reforms, and Precarious Jobs in Poland.” Pp. 229-254 in Unemployment, Internal Devaluation, and Labour Market Deregulation in Europe, edited by M. Myant, S. Theodoropoulou, and A. Piasna. Brussels: ETUI.
Google Scholar

Manolchev, Constantine, Richard Saundry, and Duncan Lewis. 2018. “Breaking Up the ‘Precariat’: Personalisation, Differentiation, and Deindividuation in Precarious Work Groups.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 42(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X18814625
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X18814625

Mažeikienė, Natalija. 2012. “Empowerment by Doing Biographical Work and through Biographical Research.” Social Work Experience and Methods 9(1):129-152.
Google Scholar

Mills, C. Wright. 1967. The Sociological Imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Mrozowicki, Adam and Vera Trappmann. 2020. “Precarity as a Biographical Problem? Young Workers Living with Precarity in Germany and Poland.” Work, Employment and Society 35(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020936898
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020936898

Narojek, Winicjusz. 1982. “Struktura społeczna w doświadczeniu jednostki. Studium z socjologii współczesnego społeczeństwa polskiego [Social Structure in the Experience of an Individual. A Study in Sociology of Contemporary Polish Society].” Warsaw: PIW.
Google Scholar

Palęcka, Alicja and Piotr P. Płucienniczak. 2017. “Niepewne zatrudnienie, lęk i działania zbiorowe. Trzy wymiary prekarności [Precarious Employment, Anxiety, and Collective Action Three Dimensions of Precarity].” Kultura i Społeczeństwo 61(4):65-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2017.61.4.4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2017.61.4.4

Petriglieri, Gianpiero, Susan J. Ashford, and Amy Wrzesniewski. 2019. “Agony and Ecstasy in the Gig Economy: Cultivating Holding Environments for Precarious and Personalized Work Identities.” Administrative Science Quarterly 64(1):124-170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218759646
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218759646

Piotrowski, Andrzej, Kaja Kaźmierska, and Katarzyna Waniek. 2011. “Biographical Consequences of Working Abroad in the Context of European Mental Space.” Przegląd Socjologiczny 60(1):139-158.
Google Scholar

Polkowska, Dominika. 2018. “Od proletariatu do prekariatu. Ciągłość czy zmiana? Próba analizy [From the Proletariat to Precariat. Continuity or Change? An Attempt at Analysis].” Prakseologia 160:41-67.
Google Scholar

Riemann, Gerhard and Fritz Schütze. 1991. “‘Trajectory’ as a Basic Theoretical Concept for Analyzing Suffering and Disorderly Social Processes.” Pp. 333-357 in Social Organization and Social Processses. Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by D. Maines. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 1983. “Biographieforschung und Narratives Interview [Biographical Research and Narrative Interview].” Neue Praxis 3:283-293.
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 1992. “Pressure and Guilt: War Experiences of a Young German Soldier and Their Biographical Implications (Part 1).” International Sociology 7(3):347-367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026858092007002005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026858092007003006

Schütze, Fritz. 2005. “Cognitive Figures of Autobiographical Extempore Narration.” Pp. 289-338 in Biographical Research Methods, edited by R. Miller. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 2006. “Verlaufskurven Des Erleidens Als Forschungsgegenstand Der Interpretativen Soziologie [Trajectories of Suffering as a Research Object in Interpretative Sociology].” Handbuch Erziehungswissenschaftliche Biographieforschung, October, 205-237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90010-0_11
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90010-0_11

Schütze, Fritz. 2008. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews—Part One.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1-2:243-297.
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 2012. “Analiza biograficzna ugruntowana empirycznie w autobiograficznym wywiadzie narracyjnym. Jak analizować autobiograficzne wywiady narracyjne [Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews].” Pp. 141-278 in Metoda biograficzna w socjologii [Biographical Method in Sociology], edited by K. Kaźmierska. Cracow: Nomos.
Google Scholar

Schütze, Fritz. 2015. “Biografische Beratung und Biografische Arbeit [Biographical Advice and Biographical Work].” Pp. 1-6 in Wörterbuch Rekonstruktive Soziale Arbeit [Dictionary of Reconstructive Social Work]. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. doi: https://doi.org/10.25656/01:23264
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/866493832

Standing, Guy. 2011. Precariat: A New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554

Strauss, Anselm. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine.
Google Scholar

Trappmann, Vera et al. 2021. “The Moral Boundary Drawing of Class: Social Inequality and Young Precarious Workers in Poland and Germany.” Sociology 55(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520985791
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520985791

Vosko, Leah. 2010. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Waniek, Katarzyna. 2016. “Potencjały bezładu i cierpienia w biografiach młodych kobiet wchodzących w świat sztuki i medycyny [Potentials of Disorder and Suffering in the Biographies of Two Young Women Entering the World of Medicine and Art].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 12(2):114-144.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.12.2.07

Waniek, Katarzyna. 2019. “The Precarious Life Situation Trap. The Case of ‘Zealous’ Julia—A Proponent and a Victim of Neoliberal Reality.” Qualitative Sociology Review 15(4):164-193. doi: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.4.08
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.4.08

Wright, Erik Olin. 2016. “Is the Precariat a Class?” Global Labour Journal 7(2):123-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v7i2.2583
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v7i2.2583