Technology and Making-Meaning in College Relationships: Understanding Hyper-Connection

Authors

  • Alecea Standlee Concord University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.01

Keywords:

Social Interaction, Presence, Absence, Relationships, College Students, Connection, Disconnection, Intimacy, Communication Technology

Abstract

This article explores how the use of communication technology has transformed social interactions and the sense of self that is derived from such interactions by considering the role of presence and absence in relationships among college students. Analyzing interviews with 38 participants, I explore how they construct understandings of presence, absence, connection, and disconnection within peer social groups and intimate relationships, indicating the emergence of a culture of hyper-connection. I suggest that technological developments have enabled forms of interaction that encourage frequent connection and the idealization of constant communication among participants. These findings further indicate that the normalization of hyper-connection may have impacts on relationship practices and constructions of identity among participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alecea Standlee, Concord University, U.S.A.

Alecea Standlee is an Assistant Professor and Sociologist at Concord University. She studies the role of techno-mediated communication in the lives of teens and young adults, with a specific focus on interpersonal relationships. Her work focuses on the persistence of relationships mediated by both technological and traditional communication styles, and utilizes symbolic interactionism and post-structural thinking.

References

Bai, Ya-Mei, Chao-Cheng Lin, and Jen-Yeu Chen. 2001. “Internet Addiction Disorder Among Clients of a Virtual Clinic.” Psychiatric Services 52(10):1397-1397.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1397

Bellotti, Elisa. 2008. “What Are Friends For? Elective Communities of Single People.” Social Networks 30(4): 318-329.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.001

Birkets, Sven. 1994. “The Electronic Hive: Two Views. Refuse It.” Harpers Magazine, May.
Google Scholar

Booth, Frances. 2013. The Distraction Trap: How to Focus in a Digital World. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2005. “The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy.” Pp. 3-22 in The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy, edited by M. Castells and G. Cardoso. Washington: Center for Transatlantic Relations.
Google Scholar

Engelberg, Elisabeth and Lennart Sjöberg. 2004. “Internet Use, Social Skills, and Adjustment.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 7(1):41-47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820101

Gergen, Kenneth. 2000. The Saturated Self: Dilemmas Of Identity In Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber F. and James A. Holstein. 2000. “The Self in a World of Going Concerns.” Symbolic Interaction 23(2):95-115.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2000.23.2.95

Hur, Mann Hyung. 2006. “Demographic, Habitual, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Internet Addiction Disorder: An Empirical Study of Korean Teenagers.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 9(5):514-525.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.514

Kraut, Robert et al. 1998. “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?” American Psychologist 53(9):1017-1031.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017

McKenna, Katelyn, Amie Green, and Marci Gleason. 2002. “Relationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the Big Attraction?” Journal of Social Issues 58(1):9-31.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246

McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. 2001. The Medium Is the Massage. Corte Madera: Gingko Press.
Google Scholar

Palfrey, John G. and Urs Gasser. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Quan-Haase, Anabel and Barry Wellman. 2005. “Hyperconnected Net Work: Computer Mediated Community in a High- Tech Organization.” Pp. 281-334 in The Corporation as a Collaborative Community: The Reconstruction of Trust in the Knowledge Economy, edited by Ch. Heckscher and P. S. Adler. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Reid, Donna and Fraser Reid. 2004. “Insights Into the Social and Psychological Effects of SMS Text Messaging.” Retrieved July 23, 2013 http://courses.educ.ubc.ca/etec540/May08/suz/assests/SocialEffectsOfTextMessaging.pdf
Google Scholar

Sanders, Christopher E. et al. 2000. “The Relationship of Internet Use to Depression and Social Isolation Among Adolescents.” Adolescence 35(138):237-242.
Google Scholar

Siomos, Konstantinos and Nikiforos Angelopoulos. 2008. “Internet Addiction Disorder.” Psychiatrike 19(1):52-58.
Google Scholar

Taylor, Steven J. and Robert Bogdan. 1998. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Wellman, Barry. 2001. “Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2):227-252.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00309

Young, Kimberly S. 1998. “Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 1(3):237-244.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

Zhao, Shanyang. 2003. “Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(5):445-455.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761261

Downloads

Published

2016-04-30

How to Cite

Standlee, A. (2016). Technology and Making-Meaning in College Relationships: Understanding Hyper-Connection. Qualitative Sociology Review, 12(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.01

Issue

Section

Articles