Pain "Is" the Club: Identity and Membership in the Natural Childbirth Community

Adam Rafalovich

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.05

Authors

Adam Rafalovich Pacific University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.05

Keywords:

United States, Natural Childbirth, Medicalization, Epidurals, Pitocin, Gender, Club Membership

Abstract

Based upon interview data collected from 50 respondents, this study examines how expectant mothers navigate the divide between natural and non-natural childbirth when faced with the dilemma of using chemical pain management. The vast majority of participants in this study had strong intentions of delivering without any type of chemical pain management, but when faced with intense physical pain and/or coaxing from medical authorities, made the decision to use an epidural. Respondent accounts illustrate that the decision to use an epidural effectively removed them from membership in the “natural childbirth club.” In order to better understand this process of group inclusion/exclusion, I draw upon the symbolic interaction frameworks of George Herbert Mead (1934) and Norbert Wiley (1995), paying special attention to their theories of the self. This study concludes that the decision to use chemical pain management in the childbirth process is often done so at the expense of changes in identity with respect to the Generalized Other of the “natural childbirth” community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adam Rafalovich, Pacific University, U.S.A.

Adam Rafalovich received his Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of British Columbia in 2002. His doctoral dissertation was a social analysis of the response of adult authorities to children suspected of having Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder. This research became the backbone of his book Framing ADHD Children (Rowman and Littlefield-Lexington Books, 2004). Dr. Rafalovich has published widely in the area of medical sociology, with articles appearing in Sociological Quarterly, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, and Deviant Behavior, and in issues of Sociology of Health and Illness and Symbolic Interaction. Dr. Rafalovich is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Pacific University in Forest Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.

References

Akrich, Madeleine and Bernike Pasveer. 2004. “Embodiment and Disembodiment in Childbirth Narratives.” Body & Society 10(2-3):63-84.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042935

Allen, Davina. 2001. “Social Perspectives on Pregnancy and Childbirth for Midwives, Nurses, and the Caring Professions.” Sociology of Health and Illness 23(3):386-396.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00257

Arney, William R. and Jane Neill. 1982. “The Location of Pain in Childbirth: Natural Childbirth and the Transformation of Obstetrics.” Sociology of Health and Illness 4(1):1-24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11345575

Barnes, Hayden H. 2011. The Ring of Fire: The Psychological Purpose of Pain in Childbirth. MA Thesis. Pacific Graduate Institute.
Google Scholar

Biernacki, Patrick and Dan Waldorf. 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods and Research 10:141-163.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205

Brubaker, Sarah J. and Heather E. Dillaway. 2009. “Medicalization, Natural Childbirth, and Birthing Experiences.” Sociology Compass 3(1):31-48.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00183.x

Christiaens, Wendy, Sarah Van de Velde, and Piet Bracke. 2011. “Pregnant Women’s Fear of Childbirth in Midwife- and Obstetrician-Led Care in Belgium and the Netherlands: Test of the Medicalization Hypothesis.” Women & Health 51(3):220-239.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2011.560999

Davis-Floyd, Robbie. 1994. “The Technocratic Body: American Childbirth as Cultural Expression.” Social Science and Medicine 38(8):1125-1140.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90228-3

Dillaway, Heather and Sarah J. Brubaker. 2006. “Intersectionality and Childbirth: How Women From Different Social Locations Discuss Epidural Use.” Race, Gender & Class 13(3-4):16-41.
Google Scholar

England, Pam and Rob Horowitz. 1998. Birthing From Within: An Extra-Ordinary Guide to Childbirth Preparation. Santa Barbara, CA: Partera Press.
Google Scholar

Epstein, Abby, director. 2008. The Business of Being Born. U.S.A.: Barranca Productions.
Google Scholar

Fisher, Colleen, Yvonne Hauck, and Jenny Fenwick. 2006. “How Social Context Impacts on Women’s Fears of Child- birth: A Western Australian Example.” Social Science & Medicine 63(1):64-75.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.065

Fontana, Andrea and James H. Frey. 2000. “The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text.” Pp. 645-72 in The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Fowler, Alexandra. 2009. Moms, Midwives, and MDs: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Medicalization and Demedicalization of Childbirth. Doctoral Dissertation. Duke University.
Google Scholar

Fox, Bonnie and Diana Worts. 1999. “Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth: A Contribution to the Sociology of Birth.” Gender & Society 13(3):326-346.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013003004

Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Guillemin, Jeanne H. and Lynda L. Holmstrom. 1986. “The Business of Childbirth.” Society 23(5):48-54.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02695558

Levesque-Lopman, Louise. 1983. “Decision and Experience: A Phenomenological Analysis of Pregnancy and Childbirth.” Human Studies 6(3):247-277.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127765

Mansfield, Becky. 2008. “The Social Nature of Natural Childbirth.” Social Science & Medicine 66(5):1084-1094.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.025

Marshall, Gordon. 1996. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford: Oxford Press.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Miller, Amy C. and Thomas E. Shriver. 2012. “Women’s Childbirth Preferences and Practices in the United States.” Social Science & Medicine 75(4):709-716.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.051

Monto, Martin A. 1997. “The Lingering Presence of Medical Definitions Among Women Committed to Natural Childbirth.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 26(3):293-316.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124197026003002

Moore, Sara B. 2011. “Reclaiming the Body, Birthing at Home: Knowledge, Power, and Control in Childbirth.” Humanity and Society 35(4):376-389.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016059761103500403

Morton, Christine H. 2003. “Doula Care: The (Re)-Emergence of Woman-Supported Childbirth in the United States.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.
Google Scholar

Nash, Anedith and Jeffrey E. Nash. 1979. “Conflicting Interpretations of Childbirth: The Medical and Natural Perspectives.” Urban Life 7(4):493-512.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167900700404

Nelson, Margaret K. 1983. “Working-Class Women, Middle-Class Women, and Models of Childbirth.” Social Problems 30(3):284-297.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1983.30.3.03a00050

Norr, Kathleen L. et al. 1977. “Explaining Pain and Enjoyment in Childbirth.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 18(3):260-275.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136353

Oakley, Ann. 1980. Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. New York: Schocken Books.
Google Scholar

Osterman, Michelle J. K. and Joyce A. Martin. 2011. “Epidural and Spinal Anesthesia Use During Labor: 27-state Reporting Area, 2008.” National Vital Statistics Reports 59(5):1-16. Retrieved April 05, 2016 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_05.pdf
Google Scholar

Rothman, Barbara K. 1978. “Childbirth as Negotiated Reality.” Symbolic Interaction 1(2):124-137.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1978.1.2.124

Sargent, Carolyn and Nancy Stark. 1989. “Childbirth Education and Childbirth Models: Parental Perspectives on Control, Anesthesia, and Technological Intervention in the Birth Process.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly (New Series) 3(1):36-51.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1989.3.1.02a00030

Stockill, Clare. 2007. “Trust the Experts? A Commentary on Choice and Control in Childbirth.” Feminism & Psychology 17(4):571-577.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507083093

Strauss, Anselm M. and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Measures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Walsh, Denis. 2006. “Subverting the Assembly-Line: Childbirth in a Free-Standing Birth Centre.” Social Science & Medicine 62(6):1330-1340.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.013

Walsh, Denis J. and S. Kitzinger. 2007. “A Birth Centre’s Encounters With Discourses of Childbirth: How Resistance Led to Innovation.” Sociology of Health and Illness 29(2):216-232.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00545.x

Webb, Eugene J. et al. 1966. Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar

Weitz, Rose and Deborah A. Sullivan. 1986. “The Politics of Childbirth: The Re-Emergence of Midwifery in Arizona.” Social Problems 33(3):163-175.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.3.03a00010

Westfall, Rachel E. and Cecilia Benoit. 2004. “The Rhetoric of ‘Natural’ in Natural Childbirth: Childbearing Women’s Perspectives on Prolonged Pregnancy and Induction of Labour.” Social Science & Medicine 59(7):1397-1408.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.017

Wheeler, Eunice L. 1980. “The Demedicalization of Childbirth.” North Central Sociological Association. Retrieved April 05, 2016 http://search.proquest.com/docview/61729225?accountid=13047
Google Scholar

Wiley, Norbert. 1995. The Semiotic Self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Zadoroznyj, Maria. 1999. “States of Health: Health and Illness in Australia.” The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 25(1):136-137.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/144078338902500115