Gamble on the Uncertain. Negotiating Medical Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.4.03Keywords:
Medical Decision-Making Process, Risk and Uncertainty, Negotiation, Qualitative Study, PortugalAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the medical decision-making process in the admission of patients into a Liver Transplant Program in a hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The relationships and main strategies established among the medical specializations involved in this process will be investigated. The theoretical basis was drawn from medical sociology, in particular, from the social constructivist approaches, which highlight the relation between medical power and knowledge in the construction of medical decision-making. I attempt to elucidate the processes of negotiation through which a medical decision is constructed. The research methodology included non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews with participants from the two medical specializations of interest: liver surgeons and hepatologists. The management of risk and uncertainty in relation to patients’ access to liver transplantation is discussed and the strategic alliances that are formed during medical decision-making in search of consensus are investigated. The research findings show that medical practices and knowledge do not converge linearly to produce a coherent network of actions with a view to decision-making. Instead, medical decision-making is constructed through complex processes of negotiation. The different natures and levels of uncertainty and indetermination that are inherent in the social world of medicine have a fundamental influence on medical decision-making.
Downloads
References
Atkinson, Paul. 1995. Medical Talk and Medical Work. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Barber, Bernard. 1990. “Control and Responsibility in the Powerful Professions.” Pp. 311-327 in Neofunctionalist Sociology, edited by P. Colomy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Bloor, Michael. 1976. “Bishop Berkeley and the Adenotonsillectomy Enigma: An Exploration of Variation in the Social Construction of Medical Disposals.” Sociology 10(43):43-61.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857601000103
Bosk, Charles L. 2003. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924687.001.0001
Carapinheiro, Graça. 1993. Saberes e Poderes no Hospital. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
Google Scholar
Cassell, Joan. 2000. The Woman in the Surgeon’s Body. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674262577
Childress, James. 1991. “Fairness in the Allocation and Delivery of Healthcare.” Pp. 180-204 in A Time to Born and a Time to Die: The Ethics of Choice, edited by B. Kogan. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Correia, Tiago. 2012. Medicina: o agir numa saúde em mudança. Lisbon: Mundos Sociais.
Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1963. Naissance de la Clinique. Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar
Fox, Nicholas. 1992. The Social Meaning of Surgery. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Fox, Renée. 1988. Essays in Medical Sociology: Journeys Into the Field. Oxford: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Griffiths, Frances, Eileen Green, and Gillian Bendelow. 2006. “Health Professionals, Their Medical Interventions, and Uncertainty: A Study Focusing on Women at Midlife.” Social Science & Medicine 62(5):1078-1090.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.027
Katz, Jay and Alexander Capron. 1975. Catastrophic Diseases: Who Decides What? A Psychosocial and Legal Analysis of the Problems Posed by Haemodialysis and Organ Transplantation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Katz, Pearl. 1999. The Scalpel’s Edge: The Culture of Surgeons. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. 2000. “The Social Construction of Medicine and the Body.” Pp. 50-63 in The Handbook of Social Studies in Health & Medicine, edited by G. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, and S. Scrimshaw. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608412.n5
Serra, Helena. 2008. Médicos e Poder: Transplantação Hepática e Tecnocracias. Lisbon: Fundação Económicas, Almedina.
Google Scholar
Serra, Helena. 2010. “Medical Technocracies in Liver Transplantation: Drawing Boundaries in Medical Practices.” Health 14(2):162-177.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309353297
Serra, Helena. 2013. “Learning From Surgery: How Medical Knowledge Is Constructed.” Professions & Professionalism 3(1):1-18.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.382
Silverman, David. 1985. Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Aldershot: Gower.
Google Scholar
Zetka, James R., Jr. 2003. Surgeons and the Scope. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711305
Zinn, Jens O. 2009. “The Sociology of Risk and Uncertainty: A Response to Judith Green’s ‘Is it Time for the Sociology of Health to Abandon ‹risk›?’” Health, Risk & Society 11(6):509-526.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903329490
Zussman, Robert. 1992. Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
