The Social Marginalization of People Living with a Mentally Ill Label–Family, Friends, and Work

Kateřina  Maloušková; Martin Fafejta

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.17.3.04

Authors

Kateřina Maloušková Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9451-8721
Martin Fafejta Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3430-7556

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.17.3.04

Keywords:

mental illness, labeling, impairment, disability, organized deviant group, deviant career, family, friends, employment, marginalization, psychiatry

Abstract

This paper is based on qualitative research among people diagnosed with a mental illness who voluntarily attend a mental health center. Such individuals are given a degrading “mentally ill” label, which transforms them into a “new” person. This study showed that—due to their label—research participants are often socially marginalized—not only in the public but also in the private sphere. As members of an “organized deviant group” (the mental health center), they follow a “deviant career” and find a job outside the regular job market. Their marginalization is not only caused by their health problems (by their impairment), but they are also disabled through social reactions to these problems. Psychiatry based on the biological model of the disease cannot, therefore, help them without the cooperation of social science approaches dealing with social marginalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kateřina Maloušková, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

Kateřina Maloušková (née Karmazínová) is a graduate of Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic, with a Master’s degree in Sociology and Czech Philology. In her Master’s thesis, she focused on the labeling of mental illness.

Martin Fafejta, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

Martin Fafejta is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Sociology, Andragogy, and Cultural Anthropology, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic. His research focuses on minorities, deviation, and the discursive construction of identity.

References

Adams, Rachel, Benjamin Reiss, and David Serlinet. 2015. “Disability.” Pp. 5-11 in Keywords for Disability Studies, edited by R. Adams, B. Reiss, and D. Serlinet. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard. 1966. Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Bracken, Pat et al. 2012. “Psychiatry Beyond the Current Paradigm.” British Journal of Psychiatry 201(6):430-434.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.109447

Foucault, Michel. 1985. “Power, Sovereignty, and Discipline.” Pp. 306-313 in States and Societies, edited by D. Held et al. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Ghaemi, S. Nassir. 2009. “The Rise and Fall of the Biopsychosocial Model.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 195(1):3-4.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Goodley, Dan. 2017. “Dis/Entangling Critical Disability Studies.” Pp. 81-97 in Culture—Theory—Disability: Encounters between Disability Studies and Cultural Studies, edited by A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, and M. Ingwersenet. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839425336-008

Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 1996. L’entretien compréhensif [Comprehansive Interview]. Paris: Nathan.
Google Scholar

Kolářová, Kateřina, ed. 2012. Jinakost, postižení, kritika. Společenské konstrukty nezpůsobilosti a hendikepu [Otherness, Disability, Criticism. Social Constructs of Impairment and Disability]. Prague: Slon.
Google Scholar

Kutchins, Herb and Stuart A. Kirk. 1999. Making Us Crazy. London: Constable.
Google Scholar

Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

Menzies, Robert, Brenda A. LeFrançois, and Geoffrey Reaume. 2013. “Introducing Mad Studies.” Pp. 1-22 in Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. A. LeFrançois, R. Menzies, and G. Reaume. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Google Scholar

Praško, Ján et al. 2012. “Stigmatizace a panická porucha [Stigmatization and Panic Disorder].” Psychiatrie pro praxi 13(3):100-103.
Google Scholar

Scheff, Thomas J. 1999. Being Mentally Ill. A Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. New Brunswick, London: Aldine Transaction.
Google Scholar

Schlegel, Rouven. 2017. “Beyond Judgment: Towards Critical Disability Studies.” Pp. 103-110 in Culture—Theory—Disability: Encounters between Disability Studies and Cultural Studies, edited by A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, and M. Ingwersenet. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Google Scholar

Thornicroft, Graham. 2006. Shunned: Discrimination against People with Mental Illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Tremain, Shelley. 2001. “On the Government of Disability.” Social Theory and Practice 27(4):617-636.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200127432

Tremain, Shelley. 2006. “Foucault and the Government of Disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(1):75-77.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410600570972

Uchtenhagen, Ambros A. 2008. “Which Future for Social Psychiatry?” International Review of Psychiatry 20(6):535-539.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260802565471

UPIAS. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
Google Scholar

Waldschmidt, Anne. 2017. “Disability Goes Cultural: The Cultural Model of Disability as an Analytical Tool.” Pp. 19-27 in Culture—Theory—Disability: Encounters between Disability Studies and Cultural Studies, edited by A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, and M. Ingwersenet. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839425336-003

Wilson, Ann and Peter Beresford. 2002. “Madness, Distress, and Postmodernity: Putting the Record Straight.” Pp. 143-158 in Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare. London: Continuum.
Google Scholar