Fiodor Dostojewski: o ułomności ludzkiego poznania

Autor

  • Iwona Magdalena Perkowska Uniwersytet Łódzki, Instytut Filozofii image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.23.07

Abstrakt

Fiodor Dostoyevsky in his oeuvre indicates certain attitudes, which are often recognized in the process of man's thinking and behavior. They are conditioned by the manner he perceives reality and they in themselves appoint simultaneously this way of world perception. Some of those occurrences resemble in a great manner the defense mechanisms, which are described in the later literature. A first mechanism that was analyzed is pursue simplification, which causes a man to believe that thanks to the achieved knowledge he will be able to set in order and fix imperfect reality. Such attitude enforces simplified vision of the world, which in turn helps in self-deception. Dostoyevsky's heroes have problems to recognize true motives of their own behaviors or they intentionally attribute nobler incentives to themselves. Therefore the next described attitude is reluctance to acknowledge the truth. The Russian writer rejects generally accepted disjunctivity of the 'truth and false' category and he attributes the final might to acknowledge something as true or false to the man's will. On account of innate laziness and refractoriness, man chooses the simplest solutions, which in point of fact dismiss possibility to see real reasons for all failures. It makes impossible to undertake activities, which could indeed change something. Man is characterized by irresponsibility for his actions and words. A word looses its causative meaning and becomes purely a decoration, an ornament. All these make that learning the truth, as one of the elements propelling development of the philosophy, was not impossible but it was unwanted.

Bibliografia

Berdyaev, N. 1957, Dostoevsky. New York: Meridian Books.
Google Scholar

Bierdiajew, N. 2001, Obraz człowieka w twórczości Dostojewskiego, (tł. S. Chabiera).
Google Scholar

W: J. Dobieszewski (red.), Wokół Leontjewa i Bierdiajewa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, seria Almanach Myśli Rosyjskiej.
Google Scholar

Brzoza, H. 1995, Dostojewski. Między mitem, tragedią i apokalipsą. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Google Scholar

Dostojewski, F. M. 1992a, Idiota, (tł. J. Jędrzejewicz). Londyn: Puls.
Google Scholar

Dostojewski, F. M. 1992b, Młodzik, (tł. M. Bogdaniowa i K. Błeszyński). Toruń: Wydawnictwo „Algo”.
Google Scholar

Dostojewski, F. M. 1992c, Notatki z podziemia, (tł. G. Karski). Londyn: Puls.
Google Scholar

Dostojewski, F. M. 1992d. Zbrodnia i kara, (tł. Cz. Jastrzębiec-Kozłowski), Londyn: Puls.
Google Scholar

Horney, K. 2001, Nerwica a rozwój człowieka, (tł. Z. Doroszowa). Poznań: Rebis.
Google Scholar

Miłosz, Cz. 1998, Rodzinna Europa. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1996, Antychrześcijanin. Przekleństwo chrześcijaństwa, (tł. G. Sowiński). Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy „Nomos”.
Google Scholar

Ossowska, M. 2000, Normy moralne. Próba systematyzacji. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Szacki, J. 2003, Historia myśli socjologicznej. Wydanie nowe. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Szestow, L. 1995, Sola fide. Tylko przez wiarę. (tł. C. Wodziński). Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Wilson, C. 1992, Outsider, (tł. M. Traczewska). Poznań: Rebis.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2010-01-01

Jak cytować

Perkowska, I. M. (2010). Fiodor Dostojewski: o ułomności ludzkiego poznania. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, (23), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.23.07

Numer

Dział

Articles